Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
.jpg "Research Chemical Sciences")
.png "Research Chemical Sciences")
K
Kano
Guest
France builds Doomsday Machine...
In the eastern regions of France, near Lyon, flanked by virgin pine forests, streams, lakes and fir clad mountain ridges, bordering on Switzerland, lays the CERN (Conseil Européen pour la Recherche Nucléaire) facility which houses over 6,300 scientists working feverishly to bring online the next generation in basic particle super-colliders. This massive Hadron collider is a magnetic ring 27 kilometers in circumference: Ultimately, it will collide beams of protons at an energy of 14 TeV. Additionally, beams of lead nuclei will be also accelerated, colliding together with an energy of 1150 TeV. The LHC will be the most powerful particle accelerator in the world.
The main purpose of this facility is to produce antimatter and black holes. A terrorist would need only half of a gram of antimatter to be equally destructive as the Hiroshima bomb. If CERN’s antimatter factory were to blow up today it would only affect the regions bordering France and Switzerland. But if CERN were to produce just one stable black hole , it could destroy the world. Surprisingly, the United States of America, through the National Science Foundation and the Department of Energy, will be funding over $1 Billion Dollars towards this French experiment into creating potentially devastating black holes.
These black holes, the densest matter in the universe, will plummet to the very core of the earth, then, slowly at first, growing one particle, one quark at a time, but at an ever accelerating rate. Scientists have estimated that a stable black hole at the center of the earth could consume not only France but the whole planet in the very short time span of between 4 minutes and 30 seconds and 7 minutes.
That age-old question: Will our planet disappear in the twinkling of an eye? - Now becomes a probability if and when the CERN facility is allowed to go on-line in 2008.
==================================================================================
IMPORTANT NOTE: On Tuesday, March 27, 2007, there was a devastating explosion deep in the tunnel at the CERN particle accelerator complex that actually blew a 20 ton magnet right off its mountings. The explosion filled the tunnel with helium and forced a mass evacuation of the facility.
While the facility was supposed to go online during the summer of 2007, the new startup is tentatively summer of 2008 after 17 miles of magnets have been repaired or replaced. This explosion, to those of us who count ourselves among the worried masses, appears to be an ominous foreshadowing of what could eventually become the Second-Coming of the Big Bang...
Even Dr. Lyn Evans, who heads the accelerator project at CERN, said the explosion had been potentially very dangerous. "There was a hell of a bang, the tunnel housing the machine filled with helium and dust and we had to call in the fire brigade to evacuate the place," he said. "The people working on the test were frightened to death but they were all in a safe place so no-one was hurt."
An investigation by the researchers found that basic math flaws had caused the explosion -- which gives one pause in contemplating how much faith can bestowed upon 6,000 scientists who can overlook basic math mistakes. Not only was this mistake made in the original design phase, but it was also missed on four engineering reviews carried out over a period of four years. The director of Fermilab, Pier Oddone, blithely wrote about the disaster stating that they had caused "a pratfall on the world stage". A pratfall ? Should these Keystone-scientists be entrusted with the fate of the world in their hands?
==================================================================================
CERN scientists obviously talk of the scientific wonders and benefits these experiments will bring. Aurélien Barrau and Julien Grain speaking on behalf of CERN say that these "tiny black holes could offer a richer view of physics than their better known, more massive relations … It should be stated … that these black holes are not dangerous and do not threaten to swallow up our already much-abused planet." When it was finally disclosed that this facility would actually be producing, during normal high-impact collider experiments, one black hole each and every second, numerous scientists cautioned that a public risk-assessment by non-affiliated scientists must be conducted for the CERN facility but not by the CERN scientists or the French government. To this very day the French have refused to make such an assessment of the potential dangers that lay ahead for all of humanity once the switch is finally pulled.
In 2008, when they fire up the Large Hadron Collider, Global Warming and Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda network will suddenly become the least of our earthly worries.
The French defend their playing at God and this potential black hole catastrophe by saying:
1. Black holes have been created by cosmic rays without incident; therefore black holes are not a danger to the planet earth.
Response A. No instrumentation or observations have ever detected the formation of black holes in the atmosphere; It is a completely unsubstantiated theory that was fabricated solely to defend the building of CERN. 1,600 hot-tub-size cosmic-ray detectors positioned over a vast area of nearly twelve hundred square miles (the ground array system for the Pierre Auger Cosmic Ray Observatory) were installed in the Pampa Amarilla in Argentina, located at the edge of the town of Malargue, in an effort to detect particle showers from disintegrations of microscopic black holes in the atmosphere. To-date this experiment has detected numerous cosmic-ray air showers, (the observatory is presently measuring more than 500 air showers each and every day) but has failed to detect any black holes spawned by cosmic rays. Since this controversial theory is the backbone to the supposed safety of the CERN black hole factory, startup should not be allowed to occur under any circumstances until the Auger Observatory can prove that harmless atmospheric black holes actually exist.
Response B. Even if a black hole could be formed by cosmic rays striking atmospheric particles, it would be a glancing blow at near the speed of light, causing the resultant mass to careen off into space at a velocity much greater than the escape velocity of the earth (11.2 km/s).
While, in contrast, the CERN particles would be striking each other as in a head-on collision, causing the resultant black holes to lose their momentum; making them unable to reach escape velocity; causing them to immediately free-fall, undetected, to the center of the earth.
2. The black holes CERN creates will not be stable. “Black hole production does not present a conceivable risk at the LHC due to the rapid decay of the black hole through thermal process”. They will be unstable and will evaporate in a flash as predicted by Stephen Hawking in 1975. The CERN facility was built under the assumption that Hawking radiation was a fact and that the black holes they would automatically create would be unstable and therefore not be a threat to the human race and the planet upon which we reside.
Response A. No instrumentation or observations have ever detected the Hawking radiation being emitted from any black hole. Kip S. Thorne, a professor of theoretical physics at Caltech, who has been working on evaporation with Hawking, says: “It’s possible, we understand quantum fields far less that what we believe and it’s a mistake when we think black holes evaporate. It is however true that we should feel more in ease if astronomers could effectively observe clues of black holes evaporation”.
Response B. Black holes by their very definition are stable: Nothing escapes their gravitational pull. And that includes radiation.
Response C. In Dublin Ireland on July 21 2004, Stephen Hawking, at the age of 62, retracted his original 1975 concept whereby matter disappearing into black holes traveled through the black hole to a new parallel universe – just like on Star Trek! After 30 years of thinking about the paradox he created, that violated the 1st Law of Thermodynamics, Stephen Hawking now admits that he was wrong about the dynamics of black holes. Stephen Hawking went on to say; “I’m sorry to disappoint science fiction fans, but if information is preserved, there is no possibility of using black holes to travel to other universes.” Hawking’s original theory was more of a personal view, a hunch, which was not necessarily shared by the scientific community or even demonstrated by any cosmic observations. But CERN still looks upon it as the Holy Grail to this very day, even after Hawking admitted that his theory was wrong. Hawking radiation has always been a purely theoretical manifestation. There are many published papers by prominent scientists who have always asserted that such radiation does not exist. CERN, by doggedly relying on false science, could easily end up being the mega-industrial accident that wipes out the entire world.
How can such cosmic arrogance be stopped? Obviously reasoning will never work.
Where Stephen Hawking went so terribly wrong…
Hawking, at the age of 33, published his most famous scientific paper in 1975 – that all black holes were unstable and would emit radiation. In effect, the black hole's energy was slowly radiated away until after a certain amount of time, depending on its mass, it ceases to exist – the black hole ‘evaporates’. He based his theory on the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics – that entropy affected all matter in the universe while at the same time it violated the 1st Law of Thermodynamics. The paradox lie in his argument that objects really “disappeared” inside a black hole and left no trace, while the 1st Law of Thermodynamics says matter can be transformed but never fully destroyed.
Hawking argued by inference that the 1st Law was wrong while the 2nd law was correct – an obvious untenable paradox.
A colleague of Stephen Hawking at Cambridge University, Gary Gibbons, stated that "His style of doing science is quite dramatic. Hawking will propose a thesis and defend it to the last, until it is overthrown by better reasoning." For thirty years Hawking defended a poorly reasoned idea.
Stephen Hawking thought that since the 2nd Law proved that entropy existed in all previously observed matter/energy exchanges then black holes also must follow the 2nd Law. What he did not consider was that black holes are the singular exception that proves the rule. Black holes are natures only Perpetual Motion Machines. They chew up matter and energy transforming them into nature’s most fundamental particles swirling about in a quark-gluon plasma. They absorb energy/matter but never release energy/matter. When they have absorbed everything within their gravitational reach, they quietly wait in their black shroud of invisibility for the next passing star. And when there are no more stars they still just wait patiently as the eons pass.
- Although this is old news I for one am definitely against this playing of god and anyone sharing my beliefs should visit: http://www.lhcdefense.org and if it's in their power donate some money for funding the legal action against CERN's LHC, lead by physicists Walter L. Wagner. Or at least send a letter to your local politicians about the danger involved, all info for the USA e-mail's of local representatives can be found at the LHCdefense.org. Let's try to do something until it's too late. Thanks, McOnyx
In the eastern regions of France, near Lyon, flanked by virgin pine forests, streams, lakes and fir clad mountain ridges, bordering on Switzerland, lays the CERN (Conseil Européen pour la Recherche Nucléaire) facility which houses over 6,300 scientists working feverishly to bring online the next generation in basic particle super-colliders. This massive Hadron collider is a magnetic ring 27 kilometers in circumference: Ultimately, it will collide beams of protons at an energy of 14 TeV. Additionally, beams of lead nuclei will be also accelerated, colliding together with an energy of 1150 TeV. The LHC will be the most powerful particle accelerator in the world.
The main purpose of this facility is to produce antimatter and black holes. A terrorist would need only half of a gram of antimatter to be equally destructive as the Hiroshima bomb. If CERN’s antimatter factory were to blow up today it would only affect the regions bordering France and Switzerland. But if CERN were to produce just one stable black hole , it could destroy the world. Surprisingly, the United States of America, through the National Science Foundation and the Department of Energy, will be funding over $1 Billion Dollars towards this French experiment into creating potentially devastating black holes.
These black holes, the densest matter in the universe, will plummet to the very core of the earth, then, slowly at first, growing one particle, one quark at a time, but at an ever accelerating rate. Scientists have estimated that a stable black hole at the center of the earth could consume not only France but the whole planet in the very short time span of between 4 minutes and 30 seconds and 7 minutes.
That age-old question: Will our planet disappear in the twinkling of an eye? - Now becomes a probability if and when the CERN facility is allowed to go on-line in 2008.
==================================================================================
IMPORTANT NOTE: On Tuesday, March 27, 2007, there was a devastating explosion deep in the tunnel at the CERN particle accelerator complex that actually blew a 20 ton magnet right off its mountings. The explosion filled the tunnel with helium and forced a mass evacuation of the facility.
While the facility was supposed to go online during the summer of 2007, the new startup is tentatively summer of 2008 after 17 miles of magnets have been repaired or replaced. This explosion, to those of us who count ourselves among the worried masses, appears to be an ominous foreshadowing of what could eventually become the Second-Coming of the Big Bang...
Even Dr. Lyn Evans, who heads the accelerator project at CERN, said the explosion had been potentially very dangerous. "There was a hell of a bang, the tunnel housing the machine filled with helium and dust and we had to call in the fire brigade to evacuate the place," he said. "The people working on the test were frightened to death but they were all in a safe place so no-one was hurt."
An investigation by the researchers found that basic math flaws had caused the explosion -- which gives one pause in contemplating how much faith can bestowed upon 6,000 scientists who can overlook basic math mistakes. Not only was this mistake made in the original design phase, but it was also missed on four engineering reviews carried out over a period of four years. The director of Fermilab, Pier Oddone, blithely wrote about the disaster stating that they had caused "a pratfall on the world stage". A pratfall ? Should these Keystone-scientists be entrusted with the fate of the world in their hands?
==================================================================================
CERN scientists obviously talk of the scientific wonders and benefits these experiments will bring. Aurélien Barrau and Julien Grain speaking on behalf of CERN say that these "tiny black holes could offer a richer view of physics than their better known, more massive relations … It should be stated … that these black holes are not dangerous and do not threaten to swallow up our already much-abused planet." When it was finally disclosed that this facility would actually be producing, during normal high-impact collider experiments, one black hole each and every second, numerous scientists cautioned that a public risk-assessment by non-affiliated scientists must be conducted for the CERN facility but not by the CERN scientists or the French government. To this very day the French have refused to make such an assessment of the potential dangers that lay ahead for all of humanity once the switch is finally pulled.
In 2008, when they fire up the Large Hadron Collider, Global Warming and Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda network will suddenly become the least of our earthly worries.
The French defend their playing at God and this potential black hole catastrophe by saying:
1. Black holes have been created by cosmic rays without incident; therefore black holes are not a danger to the planet earth.
Response A. No instrumentation or observations have ever detected the formation of black holes in the atmosphere; It is a completely unsubstantiated theory that was fabricated solely to defend the building of CERN. 1,600 hot-tub-size cosmic-ray detectors positioned over a vast area of nearly twelve hundred square miles (the ground array system for the Pierre Auger Cosmic Ray Observatory) were installed in the Pampa Amarilla in Argentina, located at the edge of the town of Malargue, in an effort to detect particle showers from disintegrations of microscopic black holes in the atmosphere. To-date this experiment has detected numerous cosmic-ray air showers, (the observatory is presently measuring more than 500 air showers each and every day) but has failed to detect any black holes spawned by cosmic rays. Since this controversial theory is the backbone to the supposed safety of the CERN black hole factory, startup should not be allowed to occur under any circumstances until the Auger Observatory can prove that harmless atmospheric black holes actually exist.
Response B. Even if a black hole could be formed by cosmic rays striking atmospheric particles, it would be a glancing blow at near the speed of light, causing the resultant mass to careen off into space at a velocity much greater than the escape velocity of the earth (11.2 km/s).
While, in contrast, the CERN particles would be striking each other as in a head-on collision, causing the resultant black holes to lose their momentum; making them unable to reach escape velocity; causing them to immediately free-fall, undetected, to the center of the earth.
2. The black holes CERN creates will not be stable. “Black hole production does not present a conceivable risk at the LHC due to the rapid decay of the black hole through thermal process”. They will be unstable and will evaporate in a flash as predicted by Stephen Hawking in 1975. The CERN facility was built under the assumption that Hawking radiation was a fact and that the black holes they would automatically create would be unstable and therefore not be a threat to the human race and the planet upon which we reside.
Response A. No instrumentation or observations have ever detected the Hawking radiation being emitted from any black hole. Kip S. Thorne, a professor of theoretical physics at Caltech, who has been working on evaporation with Hawking, says: “It’s possible, we understand quantum fields far less that what we believe and it’s a mistake when we think black holes evaporate. It is however true that we should feel more in ease if astronomers could effectively observe clues of black holes evaporation”.
Response B. Black holes by their very definition are stable: Nothing escapes their gravitational pull. And that includes radiation.
Response C. In Dublin Ireland on July 21 2004, Stephen Hawking, at the age of 62, retracted his original 1975 concept whereby matter disappearing into black holes traveled through the black hole to a new parallel universe – just like on Star Trek! After 30 years of thinking about the paradox he created, that violated the 1st Law of Thermodynamics, Stephen Hawking now admits that he was wrong about the dynamics of black holes. Stephen Hawking went on to say; “I’m sorry to disappoint science fiction fans, but if information is preserved, there is no possibility of using black holes to travel to other universes.” Hawking’s original theory was more of a personal view, a hunch, which was not necessarily shared by the scientific community or even demonstrated by any cosmic observations. But CERN still looks upon it as the Holy Grail to this very day, even after Hawking admitted that his theory was wrong. Hawking radiation has always been a purely theoretical manifestation. There are many published papers by prominent scientists who have always asserted that such radiation does not exist. CERN, by doggedly relying on false science, could easily end up being the mega-industrial accident that wipes out the entire world.
How can such cosmic arrogance be stopped? Obviously reasoning will never work.
Where Stephen Hawking went so terribly wrong…
Hawking, at the age of 33, published his most famous scientific paper in 1975 – that all black holes were unstable and would emit radiation. In effect, the black hole's energy was slowly radiated away until after a certain amount of time, depending on its mass, it ceases to exist – the black hole ‘evaporates’. He based his theory on the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics – that entropy affected all matter in the universe while at the same time it violated the 1st Law of Thermodynamics. The paradox lie in his argument that objects really “disappeared” inside a black hole and left no trace, while the 1st Law of Thermodynamics says matter can be transformed but never fully destroyed.
Hawking argued by inference that the 1st Law was wrong while the 2nd law was correct – an obvious untenable paradox.
A colleague of Stephen Hawking at Cambridge University, Gary Gibbons, stated that "His style of doing science is quite dramatic. Hawking will propose a thesis and defend it to the last, until it is overthrown by better reasoning." For thirty years Hawking defended a poorly reasoned idea.
Stephen Hawking thought that since the 2nd Law proved that entropy existed in all previously observed matter/energy exchanges then black holes also must follow the 2nd Law. What he did not consider was that black holes are the singular exception that proves the rule. Black holes are natures only Perpetual Motion Machines. They chew up matter and energy transforming them into nature’s most fundamental particles swirling about in a quark-gluon plasma. They absorb energy/matter but never release energy/matter. When they have absorbed everything within their gravitational reach, they quietly wait in their black shroud of invisibility for the next passing star. And when there are no more stars they still just wait patiently as the eons pass.
- Although this is old news I for one am definitely against this playing of god and anyone sharing my beliefs should visit: http://www.lhcdefense.org and if it's in their power donate some money for funding the legal action against CERN's LHC, lead by physicists Walter L. Wagner. Or at least send a letter to your local politicians about the danger involved, all info for the USA e-mail's of local representatives can be found at the LHCdefense.org. Let's try to do something until it's too late. Thanks, McOnyx
