TV Ads Say S.U.V. Owners Support Terrorists

[FLASHMAN1]

I saw those two ridiculous commercials, and those people are assholes... Guess what? I don't give a flying fuck how the rest of the world views us... They don't like us??? Fine!! they can go shit in thier hats and pull them over thier greasy heads... By thier rationale, if you use ANY gasoline whatsoever, you're at least supporting terrorism "a little". What a crock of shit!!! Do we Americans have more than we need?? sure we do, but that's the beauty of living in a free country and being industrious enough and making our own choices, including deciding how much we want to pay for our vehicles/gasmileage... FUCK HER!!! I'm sure all her cars are electric right??? And I'm sure she travels in an electric plane right??? That woman is just another tree-hugging piece of shit with nothing better to do than rag on people for any reason they can find... I drive a truck, but to commute back and forth to work, I have an economical car. Does everyone that has an SUV NEED one??? Of course not, but it's THIER CHOICE, and no one should accuse them of supporting terrorism because of the car they drive getting better or worse gas mileage. That's just stupid. I know a lot of vehicles (cars) that get WAY worse gas mileage than our SUV's... Yet they're not being singled out, are they??? fucking idiots....

 

[FLASHMAN1]

I bet a whole dollar that she travels much more modestly or her opponents would rip her apart.

Whether she travels modestly or whether she travels lavishly, what's the fuckin difference??? Either way, by HER deluded rationale, if her vehicle(s) use ANY gas whatsoever, she's helping to support terrorism... Either way, she's full of shit...

 

[gymtime]

Whether she travels modestly or whether she travels lavishly, what's the fuckin difference??? Either way, by HER deluded rationale, if her vehicle(s) use ANY gas whatsoever, she's helping to support terrorism... Either way, she's full of shit...

I'd have to agree. By that logic, you could probably argue that every dollar we spend goes to support terrorism.

 

[FLASHMAN1]

I'd have to agree. By that logic, you could probably argue that every dollar we spend goes to support terrorism.

Exactly bro, these fucking idiots do these things all the time to do nothing other than promote thier own name to sell more books, movies, columns, etc... This type of woman couldn't give a shit less about terrorism or what supports it, just as long as she can maintain her standard of living. By selling more of her verbal diarreah...

 

[Norman Bates]

At first i thought it was a parody on the "drugs support terrorism" ads.

 

[2Thick]

I saw those two ridiculous commercials, and those people are assholes... Guess what? I don't give a flying fuck how the rest of the world views us... They don't like us??? Fine!! they can go shit in thier hats and pull them over thier greasy heads...

That is a wondeful outlook.

 

[atlantabiolab]

I don't think it's about Americans buying gas per se. I think it's about Americans having infinitely more than they need. Don't know that I'd go as far as saying that it directly supports terrorism. However it does contribute to how the world views us.

Honesly, how many of us really need an SUV? Gimme a break. I'd like to see a study done that answers questions like:

When was the last time you put that thing in 4wd?
How many days out of the year do you drive that thing to work alone?

We are Americans. We are glutons. Right or wrong, we should at least admit it.

Please tell us who and by what standard do we determine "What we NEED"??? Do you really need the computer that you are sitting in front of to survive??? I doubt it, primitive cultures right now SURVIVE without one.

Also, at what point in time did we require the approval of socialist/Marxists in Western Europe and dictatorships in Second and Third World countries? The list of government imposed restrictions on freedom in these countries would be long and eye-opening to most. Freedom is the ability to control the aspects of one's personal life and property, by what right to you have to impose your opinion on what is not yours? If you do not want a large vehicle don't buy one. How would you conduct your theoretical study?? It is purely subjective.

Understand this people, we are a tremendous economy for the very reason of our spending and buying. We are able to GIVE foreign aid to other countries, who turn around and shit on us, for the very reason that we are wealthy from buying and spending. Where would money come from if we did not have businesses that catered to our every wish? Would the government simply open the printing press and mail us checks to buy only what we need?

 

[2Thick]

Also, at what point in time did we require the approval of socialist/Marxists in Western Europe and dictatorships in Second and Third World countries? The list of government imposed restrictions on freedom in these countries would be long and eye-opening to most.

Where do you get this false information? No country in the world is Marxist. At best, they are Leninist (not that you would know what that means).

The US is slowly losing its "so called" freedoms. At this point in time, Canada is far more free than the United Staes. You can thank the current administration for that.

 

[HumorMe]

Here you go gymtime....this is definitely the pot calling the kettle black!

Arianna Huffington


What a bunch of hypocrits!

 

[atlantabiolab]

Where do you get this false information? No country in the world is Marxist. At best, they are Leninist (not that you would know what that means).

Your right, I guess Lenin was following the principles of Thomas Jefferson. Wait!, maybe it isn't Marxism, maybe it is Communism?, No, it's really Scientific Socialism!?!?! Why don't you go save the Aborigine.

The US is slowly losing its "so called" freedoms.

It must be very obvious if a Canadian can see it.

At this point in time, Canada is far more free than the United Staes. You can thank the current administration for that.

Sorry, Canada may have some rights that the US doesn't, but your system has its fair share of regulations that control the population.

Here is a nice little tidbit I dug up on your nice government:
Countering Hate Crime in Canada

Responding to Hate Crimes requires a multifaceted approach, including protection (by the law), prevention (through education) and partnerships (community coalition building).

Protection – Remedies in Law
Hate propaganda, the promotion of hatred against identifiable groups, became a criminal offense in Canada in 1970, when the hate laws were adopted as amendments to the Criminal Code. That same year, Canada ratified the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. The Canadian Human Rights Act and the various provincial human rights codes also address the issue of hate. Countering hate crime is not only consistent with our international obligation under the Convention, but is based on a vision of our multicultural society that is entrenched in the Canadian Bill of Rights (1960) and articulated clearly in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1982). The anti-hate laws have been upheld as constitutional by the Supreme Court of Canada, and in 1996 an amendment to the Criminal Code made hate motivation an aggravating factor upon sentencing, enshrining in law the precedent that hate motivation rendered a crime more heinous.

Nice example of thought crimes. It is illegal to make a STATEMENT against others if it can be argued, by any stretch of the imagination, that is might be discriminatory.

Why only this administration?? You think Clinton freed us from bondage? Try every adminstration since FDR. Actually all presidencies have probably imposed some restrictions on freedom, it is the way governments work. The founders argued that this would happen in time.