EliteFitnessGuy
New member
Recently I posted a thread about the doubtful effect of Turinabol that I experienced during the beginning of my solo Turinabol cycle. I got no reply. However, now I would like to present my opinion on this stuff.
During the last year I read a lot of very positive comments concerning Turinabol and I started to be a big fan of it. In summer 2008 I ran 20-30 mg/day of Turinabol and stanozolol for 7 weeks (my second steroid cycle) and I achieved very nice strength gains and mild, but still appreciable increases of my bodily circumferences. I attributed most of these gains to Turinabol and one month ago, I decided to run it solo, 50 mg/day for 6 weeks and then 25 mg/day for 2 weeks. Although I was warned by several guys that it is a crap that must be run in huge doses for at least 2 months, I didn't believe it, because I have read a lot of stories about awesome strength gains during a cycle of Turinabol at medium doses of 60 mg/day.
After 2 weeks, I started to have a strong suspicion that something's wrong. While during the previous cycle I already added 8 kg (17 lbs) on my bench press, this time I noticed no strength increase worthy of note. During the 3rd week, I had to upper the dose to 75 mg/day (at least on a training day, which means every other day), otherwise I wouldn't feel virtually anything during training. After 3 1/2 weeks, I gained 4 kg (9 lbs), but it was obviously only fat and water, because my bench press performance improved by mere 3 kg (6,5 lbs). It was clear that this cycle will be an utter fiasco, because I didn't have more capsules than for 2-3 weeks. I immediately bought some stanozolol and started to run it at 40 mg/day. After 8 days on 40 mg stanozolol/day and 25 mg Turinabol/day, I eventually see some solid strength increase, as well as a very pleasant feeling of energy. I will run it for the next 3-4 weeks.
My conclusion: The guys were right. Turinabol is a very weak steroid that may be useful for steroid novices weighing 160-170 lbs, but not for me (5'10/215 lbs). If you are an experienced trainee, don't waste your money and time with this crap. Considering that I would have to take at least 100 mg/day for 2 months to feel some effect, it would be better to buy oxandrolone and run it at 50 mg/day. It would cost the same price and it would be certainly much more effective.
As a former fan of Turinabol, I am utterly disgusted from this stuff, because I uselessly wasted my money. It worked worse than creatine that is 10-times cheaper. Really not the wisest choice. Now I understand, why the former sport system of GDR was not successful with their male athletes. They couldn't really gain much from it - in contrast with women, who react very strongly even to very small doses of androgens.
During the last year I read a lot of very positive comments concerning Turinabol and I started to be a big fan of it. In summer 2008 I ran 20-30 mg/day of Turinabol and stanozolol for 7 weeks (my second steroid cycle) and I achieved very nice strength gains and mild, but still appreciable increases of my bodily circumferences. I attributed most of these gains to Turinabol and one month ago, I decided to run it solo, 50 mg/day for 6 weeks and then 25 mg/day for 2 weeks. Although I was warned by several guys that it is a crap that must be run in huge doses for at least 2 months, I didn't believe it, because I have read a lot of stories about awesome strength gains during a cycle of Turinabol at medium doses of 60 mg/day.
After 2 weeks, I started to have a strong suspicion that something's wrong. While during the previous cycle I already added 8 kg (17 lbs) on my bench press, this time I noticed no strength increase worthy of note. During the 3rd week, I had to upper the dose to 75 mg/day (at least on a training day, which means every other day), otherwise I wouldn't feel virtually anything during training. After 3 1/2 weeks, I gained 4 kg (9 lbs), but it was obviously only fat and water, because my bench press performance improved by mere 3 kg (6,5 lbs). It was clear that this cycle will be an utter fiasco, because I didn't have more capsules than for 2-3 weeks. I immediately bought some stanozolol and started to run it at 40 mg/day. After 8 days on 40 mg stanozolol/day and 25 mg Turinabol/day, I eventually see some solid strength increase, as well as a very pleasant feeling of energy. I will run it for the next 3-4 weeks.
My conclusion: The guys were right. Turinabol is a very weak steroid that may be useful for steroid novices weighing 160-170 lbs, but not for me (5'10/215 lbs). If you are an experienced trainee, don't waste your money and time with this crap. Considering that I would have to take at least 100 mg/day for 2 months to feel some effect, it would be better to buy oxandrolone and run it at 50 mg/day. It would cost the same price and it would be certainly much more effective.
As a former fan of Turinabol, I am utterly disgusted from this stuff, because I uselessly wasted my money. It worked worse than creatine that is 10-times cheaper. Really not the wisest choice. Now I understand, why the former sport system of GDR was not successful with their male athletes. They couldn't really gain much from it - in contrast with women, who react very strongly even to very small doses of androgens.

Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 













), he refused another offers from this lab. It simply wouldn't pay off for the possible risks.
(that i like to share over and over again lmao)