I was asked to post on this thread, so I will -- even though I didn't read the entire thing. That's because it's a belaboured issue and I'm not in the mood to preach. So I'll take a diferent approach.
When raising my son, I followed these rules:
Never talk down to him.
Always treat him as if he was two tears older than his actual age.
Never lie to him.
Never restrict him.
Never make him feel guilty.
Always try to educate him in every way.
Never threaten him.
Never break a promise.
Always let him know when he screwed up -- why he screwed up -- and what happens if he continues to screw up , but NEVER punish him.
I gave him a lot of slack, so when I told him something was a bad idea, he had no reason to doubt me.
Long story short: He grew up to be a street wise kid who graduated summa cum laude and today is a happy, healthy. well adjusted and succesfull adult.
The moral of the story? It isn't about instilling fear. It's all about making wise decisions.
Meanwhile, some of the analogy's presented on this thread just don't fly.
In the case of steroids, it isn't like abstenence. The sexual urge is a driving force of life. Steroids are just an easy answer.
It isn't like drinking. Most every kid will get shit faced now and then, pay the price and move on.
Some of these kids who are saying it was a great decision sound as stupid as some kid saying it was a great decision to start smoking.
Steroids are unique, yet share a similarity to drugs in that their dangers have been overstated. Hey, I grew up in the 60's when there was REALLY a disparity about the propaganda and the truth about drugs. And because the dangers were overstated, a lot of young people assumed they weren't dangerous at all. I had a lot of friends that insisted they were "just fine" -- right up until the time they were junkies, or arrested, or dead.
The real crime is when some idiot who should know better, doesn't discourage a young man from using steroids. It has nothing to do with the kids "rights." It's just a bad idea. Being knowlegable on the subject doesn't make it more acceptable. It's still a bad idea.
I'll say just one more thing, then off of my soap box. If a man who doesn't need glasses and begins to wear glasses, his eyes will adjust, become weaker, and becoming depentant on the glasses. If a man walks with a cane long enough, he will walk with a limp without it. Keep an baby bull in a cage, and it will never grow to its full size.
I'll let you draw your own conclusions.