Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply US-PHARMACIES UGL OZ
Raptor Labs UGFREAK OxygenPharm
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplyUS-PHARMACIES UGL OZUGFREAKRaptor LabsOxygenPharm

Taylor Swift getting a movie role

PICK3

New member
FOX411 Country: Taylor Swift Heading To The Big Screen? | Fox News

great!

she can demonstrate her lack of talent in yet another medium

010512_411_country_640.jpg
 
I talked to Nef about this a few days ago. Taylor Swift playing Eponine is the worst idea I've ever heard. Way to fucking ruin a classic.
 
pop stars never migrate well to the big screen. When your fan base are all tweens -- it's hard to make a legit long career. Even JT's film career isn't so hot.
 
pop stars never migrate well to the big screen. When your fan base are all tweens -- it's hard to make a legit long career. Even JT's film career isn't so hot.
You do live in Hollywood. So you would know :rolleyes:

Oh, Jennifer Lopez, Mark Walberg, Janet Jackson, Beyonce Knowles, Cher, Jessica Simpson, and Acadamy award winning Jennifer Hudson all had/have successful acting careers. and JT has made tens of millions in movie salaries. His movies have Grossed voer 150 million dollars.

So never is a broad term. :verygood:
 
You do live in Hollywood. So you would know :rolleyes:

Oh, Jennifer Lopez, Mark Walberg, Janet Jackson, Beyonce Knowles, Cher, Jessica Simpson, and Acadamy award winning Jennifer Hudson all had/have successful acting careers. and JT has made tens of millions in movie salaries. His movies have Grossed voer 150 million dollars.

So never is a broad term. :verygood:

What? That's the worst example ever.

He said its hard to make a legit long career, not that it's hard to make one at all.

Jennifer Hudson hasn't made a successful move since Dream Girls and never will. She's a terrible actress. She won for Effie because the role wasn't much of a stretch for her: being a struggling singer and all. She was so bad in the sex and the city movie I literally cringed watching. And most, if not all, of those other people suck as well - putting out terrible movie after terrible movie, and maybe one or two of them tops have put out a decent movie or 2, but have outweighed those by playing in many more terrible ones.
 
What? That's the worst example ever.

He said its hard to make a legit long career, not that it's hard to make one at all.

Jennifer Hudson hasn't made a successful move since Dream Girls and never will. She's a terrible actress. She won for Effie because the role wasn't much of a stretch for her: being a struggling singer and all. She was so bad in the sex and the city movie I literally cringed watching. And most, if not all, of those other people suck as well - putting out terrible movie after terrible movie, and maybe one or two of them tops have put out a decent movie or 2, but have outweighed those by playing in many more terrible ones.

Whats legit?
Whats long?
She won because of your opinion?
The Sex and the citt movie sucked overall.
Movie success is gauged in $ , and roles are paid in previous movie successes
your opinion. And $ = hundreds of thousands or millions
paying to see them Amy.
 
Whats legit?
Whats long?
She won because of your opinion?
The Sex and the citt movie sucked overall.
Movie success is gauged in $ , and roles are paid in previous movie successes
your opinion. And $ = hundreds of thousands or millions
paying to see them Amy.

Legit = consistently putting out good movies.
Good = critically good movies
What's long? Seriously?

Jennifer Hudson winning for the reason I said isn't only my opinion. You can find many many people to back me up. She's been in more than the SATC movie since then and they've all been so atrocious, it's clear she won bc that role happened to suit her, not because she acted herself in to suiting the role.

And I guess that's where we disagree. I'm basing success on how many good movies they've been in, how many roles they've had that have actually been heralded as good work, not how many movies they've been in that have made money.

Shitty movies with shitty actors make money all the time, I don't think that means the actors in it are legit. If Jennifer Lopez in shit like Gigli and Beyonce in crap like The Fighting Temptations adds to them having long, legitimate careers to you then ok. :rolleyes:
 
Legit = consistently putting out good movies.
Good = critically good movies
What's long? Seriously?

Jennifer Hudson winning for the reason I said isn't only my opinion. You can find many many people to back me up. She's been in more than the SATC movie since then and they've all been so atrocious, it's clear she won bc that role happened to suit her, not because she acted herself in to suiting the role.

And I guess that's where we disagree. I'm basing success on how many good movies they've been in, how many roles they've had that have actually been heralded as good work, not how many movies they've been in that have made money.

Shitty movies with shitty actors make money all the time, I don't think that means the actors in it are legit. If Jennifer Lopez in shit like Gigli and Beyonce in crap like The Fighting Temptations adds to them having long, legitimate careers to you then ok. :rolleyes:
No not established/non established actor/ress has put out "Consistantly good movies
Good = Critically good (IE the Critics hate it but you go watch it and enjoy it?)
Long= Like John Travolta long, Tom Cruise long, Collen Ferrel long, Brab Pitt long, Johnny Depp long?
YES Seriously whats "LONG"

LOL, your Right about Gigli and the Fighting temptations (And I reallllllllllyyyy shouldn't have had Beyonce in the list) .
But All the current stars have been in plenty of bombs.
 
No not established/non established actor/ress has put out "Consistantly good movies
Good = Critically good (IE the Critics hate it but you go watch it and enjoy it?)
Long= Like John Travolta long, Tom Cruise long, Collen Ferrel long, Brab Pitt long, Johnny Depp long?
YES Seriously whats "LONG"

LOL, your Right about Gigli and the Fighting temptations (And I reallllllllllyyyy shouldn't have had Beyonce in the list) .
But All the current stars have been in plenty of bombs.

There's a big difference between what I enjoy and what I know was a good movie. I enjoy most movies; they're for entertainment. Does that mean they're good? No. That's our disconnect.

I didn't say there are actors who've never put out a bomb of a movie. The difference between good actors and most of those you listed is that their ratio of good movies and roles to bad ones is a much better one than most of the singers' you named.
 
1: There's a big difference between what I enjoy and what I know was a good movie. I enjoy most movies; they're for entertainment. Does that mean they're good? No. That's our disconnect.

2; I didn't say there are actors who've never put out a bomb of a movie. The difference between good actors and most of those you listed is that their ratio of good movies and roles to bad ones is a much better one than most of the singers' you named.


1: Ditto, I like plenty of movies that made $ and Sucked, and Vice Versa (Hence me hating the Critics)

2; I was going only off their Salary, Success/Gross income of the movies they STAR in and future offers.
 
Jennifer Hudson just put out a weight watchers commercial, right? just sayin amy
yeah but that's not much of an acting achievement, she is the spokesperson become she lost a ton of weight, you see, non actors and loser washouts in those commercials too...
 
Taylor hate from guys cracks me up. There isn't an EF broheim here who wouldn't fall all over themselves to hit this:

taylorswift-npics.jpg


Except pick3, 'cause he prefers to smoke sawsage instead.
 
I talked to Nef about this a few days ago. Taylor Swift playing Eponine is the worst idea I've ever heard. Way to fucking ruin a classic.

Really?

This, I think, reflects why it's a terrible idea to film the movie, not necessarily the casting choice. I mean, who would you choose for that role? Obviously an extremely talented no-name would be best, but why not give Taylor a shot?

I think she could surprise us.

PS I love her. Not ashamed to admit it. Ok, maybe a little ashamed. Damn.
 
You guys didn't mention Will Smith as a successful music artist who also made hits on the big screen. He's awesome!
 
Really?

This, I think, reflects why it's a terrible idea to film the movie, not necessarily the casting choice. I mean, who would you choose for that role? Obviously an extremely talented no-name would be best, but why not give Taylor a shot?

I think she could surprise us.

PS I love her. Not ashamed to admit it. Ok, maybe a little ashamed. Damn.

FTR, I have no problem with Taylor Swift at all, I just hate her in this role. It does have a little to do with the fact that I don't think physically she fits it (which to me points to her being chosen for her fame) but I'm also afraid vocally what she'll do to one of the most famous songs in All of broadway.

I'm also not positive how I feel about Anne Hathaway as Fantine or Russel Crowe as Javert, but I'm totally in love with the thought of Hugh Jackman as Jean Valjean, and Sacha Baron Cohen and Helena Bonham Carter as Mr. and Mrs. Thenardier.
 
yeeessss amy :qt:

In the past Taylor has always been annoying to me, probably because I don't find high school social situations interesting lol. Recently her songs about her celebrity relationships have been amusing but I don't think her voice and appearance are good enough w/o her lyrics behind it and her lucky number written on her arm. I generally like her as a person though, hopefully she does not turn this into a huge fail.
 
Taylor hate from guys cracks me up. There isn't an EF broheim here who wouldn't fall all over themselves to hit this:

taylorswift-npics.jpg


Except pick3, 'cause he prefers to smoke sawsage instead.

girl does zero for me...no tits, no ass, mild looks i.mo...i'd hit it for the novelty, but that's about it.
boring and boney
 
plus as soon as u dump her bitch ass shell write a tell all song about how much of an assu were.thatd b great to date no thanks
 
she looks androgynous, like a more manly verison of david bowie.
i'd rather get a reacharound from ER or have pick3 toss my salad
 
girl does zero for me...no tits, no ass, mild looks i.mo...i'd hit it for the novelty, but that's about it.
boring and boney

Do you like them thick, or just medium-sized?

What do you think of J-Lo or Kardashian?
 
Do you like them thick, or just medium-sized?

What do you think of J-Lo or Kardashian?

all depends on how it's worn, but curves of all sizes appeal to me...fitness thick, like cutiebolic (minus the rat infestation) works too.
but yea both kim k and jlo fit my bill of disreability, though they are both retarded elitists morons
 
all depends on how it's worn, but curves of all sizes appeal to me...fitness thick, like cutiebolic (minus the rat infestation) works too.
but yea both kim k and jlo fit my bill of disreability, though they are both retarded elitists morons

Does this mean I should change my profile body type to "fitness thick"? Lol

Thanks for the shout out, Bino! ;p
 
all depends on how it's worn, but curves of all sizes appeal to me...fitness thick, like cutiebolic (minus the rat infestation) works too.
but yea both kim k and jlo fit my bill of disreability, though they are both retarded elitists morons

Seriously, though, I think it has a lot to do with how a person carries his/herself... But I like a healthy-looking body. Well nourished, clean, hydrated, non-smoking, between 5'10 and 6'3"... But I digress....

Taylor is beautiful. Sure she's skinny but she's not unhealthfully starving, she's just genetically a "hard gainer".
 
Seriously, though, I think it has a lot to do with how a person carries his/herself... But I like a healthy-looking body. Well nourished, clean, hydrated, non-smoking, between 5'10 and 6'3"... But I digress....

Taylor is beautiful. Sure she's skinny but she's not unhealthfully starving, she's just genetically a "hard gainer".

I think you meant to say 6'5 :worried:
 
all depends on how it's worn, but curves of all sizes appeal to me...fitness thick, like cutiebolic (minus the rat infestation) works too.
but yea both kim k and jlo fit my bill of disreability, though they are both retarded elitists morons

I like them tall, blonde, a tad skinny and extra sweet.

Bitchy (even a little) is a non-starter.

And oddly enough, I like a small bit of trailer trash. But my wife doesn't even have a little splash.

Ever see Jamie Pressly in Joe Dirt or Ringmaster?

david_spade_jaime_pressly_joe_dirt_001.jpg


normal_Ringmaster_DVDCaptures-129.jpg


Oh my...
 
I like them tall, blonde, a tad skinny and extra sweet.

Bitchy (even a little) is a non-starter.

And oddly enough, I like a small bit of trailer trash. But my wife doesn't even have a little splash.

Ever see Jamie Pressly in Joe Dirt or Ringmaster?

david_spade_jaime_pressly_joe_dirt_001.jpg


normal_Ringmaster_DVDCaptures-129.jpg


Oh my...

Your life is so rough, plunk. ;)
 
jamie pressley is def hot, though she would look better with some fake nugs and 10 more lbs on her ass.
lately i've been infatuated with denise richards, such a naughty minx

Denise_richards_994.jpg
 
jamie pressley is def hot, though she would look better with some fake nugs and 10 more lbs on her ass.
lately i've been infatuated with denise richards, such a naughty minx

Denise_richards_994.jpg

The mid to late 1990's size zero version of Denise Richards was awesome awesomeness.
 
Top Bottom