Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Socialized healthcare...

Big Rick Rock

istrator
Peeps in the USA what are your thoughts on the issue? Should we have Socialized health care?



Peeps abroad in countries that Universal healthcare already. Whats your experience dealing with it in your country?
 
If it works, it would be for the best. Of course, for those that can afford health care, which is getting slimmer and slimmer... they don't want it.
 
brr43.jpg
 
biteme said:
If it works, it would be for the best. Of course, for those that can afford health care, which is getting slimmer and slimmer... they don't want it.

It is working in other countries, despite all the bad press.
 
The VA takes 186 days to process one claim, and only 10% of the adult population are veterans. You want a federal bureaucracy to control all health care?
 
We have it here in Canada and it's great - unless you need a big operation or an MRI or something like that. Waiting lists for surgery are insane, up to a year or more. Frankly I'd prefer the chance to pay for stuff if you want it fast, which is what most Canadians do - they go to the US and pay for it.

Also, hospital waiting rooms take 8 hours because every new immigrant brings their kids to the emergency room when they have a cold.

I guess there are pros and cons, but it is mostly a big pro - it is a great peace of mind to know that you can get health care anytime if you have a problem and not have to pay a dime - just wait forever. Small price IMO.
 
ponyfitness said:
We have it here in Canada and it's great - unless you need a big operation or an MRI or something like that. Waiting lists for surgery are insane, up to a year or more. Frankly I'd prefer the chance to pay for stuff if you want it fast, which is what most Canadians do - they go to the US and pay for it.

Also, hospital waiting rooms take 8 hours because every new immigrant brings their kids to the emergency room when they have a cold.

I guess there are pros and cons, but it is mostly a big pro - it is a great peace of mind to know that you can get health care anytime if you have a problem and not have to pay a dime - just wait forever. Small price IMO.

Misnomer, not have to pay a dime. The money still comes out of your pocket but now you are paying for everyone else, not only you and yours.
 
True - I am paying for all of those people taking their kids to the emergency room with a cold. However, it is a small price to pay considering an overnight stay in a hospital can cost $5000 anywhere else.
 
ponyfitness said:
We have it here in Canada and it's great - unless you need a big operation or an MRI or something like that. Waiting lists for surgery are insane, up to a year or more. Frankly I'd prefer the chance to pay for stuff if you want it fast, which is what most Canadians do - they go to the US and pay for it.

Also, hospital waiting rooms take 8 hours because every new immigrant brings their kids to the emergency room when they have a cold.

I guess there are pros and cons, but it is mostly a big pro - it is a great peace of mind to know that you can get health care anytime if you have a problem and not have to pay a dime - just wait forever. Small price IMO.

Despite some of the problems in the UK, it is not that bad.

We have a dual system here of the NHS and private.

The turn around time for AE is 4 hours in most hospitals, this is a nationwide directive. If the child is under 2 years, they are seen and treated within one hour.

The issue with recent immigrants coming to AE for minor issues that could be dealt with by a GP is also being addressed, most do not realise they have to register with a surgery, as they have clinics in their countries.

I had surgery twice last year, once private and once with the NHS (national health service).

Only differences:

1. Private surgery was about 5000 pounds (I also saw some of the lab bills and as I KNOW how much some of the tests cost, time involved, I was shocked), I have no idea how much the NHS surgery cost

2. I had my own room with private, I was in a ward with about 8 women in the NHS

3. I had a menu and slightly better food with private care, although the nurses in the NHS did find me more protein sources when I asked for it

4. I had my own nurse in private and NHS, but the NHS nurse did take care of a few others besides me

5. I had to wait about three months for private surgery, I phoned almost every day and got a cancellation and got in in a month.

I had to wait two days for surgery with the NHS.

6. The surgery was scheduled with private, so they took me in when they said they would, I had to wait 'nil by mouth' for about 8 hours in the NHS and didn't get in till the late afternoon.

I was told by another BBer (also a police officer) who broke his jaw in the line of duty and needed surgery, was kept three days nil by mouth (one meal in the evening). He couldn't deal with not eating for that long so he went private.

I work for the NHS - in fact I am at work right now, 'on-call', nearly 3 am..............

I have great job security

Great retirement policy,

28 days of annual leave that increases with the amount of time I work for them, I can make extra annual leave (and the lab does not really function without people doing this),

wages are not too shabby and increase every year

they have paid for two degrees and my travel expenses (I got food expenses in my first degree)

the libraries on the hospitals are great, they bought my required reading lists, and I have Pubmed, medline access

complemetary therapies in some trusts (reflexology and massage for staff)

sent to conferences and lectures

my trust also used to have a 'learning for life' and they paid for a part of two of my open university courses in psychology

we get a staff discount at a number of places including gyms (we get a little card each year and a book of all the discounts)

25% off my train fares

staff training on stress management, managing finances, assertiveness

coffee and tea are free in our tea room

our consultant shares the 'private' money we get and we own part of a vineyard in the lab

opportunity to do flexi-time

6 months maternity leave full pay (also based on my on-call payments) or one year half pay

6 months sick leave full pay (also based on on-call payments) and then another 6 months half pay, if you are sick longer than that, you get state benefits

Men get 6 weeks paternity leave


Perks and bonuses do vary a bit from hospital to hospital (trusts), but most would have similar bonuses
__________________
 
I don't like any policy that brings the involvement of the government in our lives...
But almost every other developed nation in the world has it...
I think we can have our own and run it even better...
 
mountain muscle said:
I think a basic socialized healthcare for the USA would be good. then have insurance for more critical things.


Holland has a system that you pay something like an insurance policy directly, and it varies depending on how old you are, male or female.........
 
mountain muscle said:
I think a basic socialized healthcare for the USA would be good. then have insurance for more critical things.



right on, you should have the option to go private if you need to. But there was a good point brought up earlier.........illegal immigrants who don't pay into the system will fuck it up for everyone, that HAS to be dealt with for a socialized system to work. I never understood the illegal immigrant problem.........let em in, just make em pay SOME taxes so they don't leech off the system.
 
Big Rick Rock said:
I don't like any policy that brings the involvement of the government in our lives...
But almost every other developed nation in the world has it...
I think we can have our own and run it even better...


I can understand that with your government :)

A lot of the hospitals are run as 'trusts' so they are almost like little independent companies, they can change things to suit staff, patients..........

There are some things that are common to all, but I think that there is this fear of 'socialised' medicine that isn't really necessary.
 
redsamurai said:
right on, you should have the option to go private if you need to. But there was a good point brought up earlier.........illegal immigrants who don't pay into the system will fuck it up for everyone, that HAS to be dealt with for a socialized system to work. I never understood the illegal immigrant problem.........let em in, just make em pay SOME taxes so they don't leech off the system.



I'm sure the legal taxpayers would get an I.D card that illegals would not be abel to get... It shouldn't be that hard to regulate.
We will always have to pay for the illegal's kids, Kids are kids and can't go back home on their own... Personally, I don't have an issue with little Pedrito seeing the doc on my dime. I know my taxes wouldn't be any lower if he missed the appointment.
 
It sucks ass....

Being in the military for 10 years, that's what you get is socialized medical..

Being able to buy good coverage is the only way to go..

Did you know that in 1975 less than 35% of employers provided health care for their employees??

now we have ambulance rides costing $1200 because some lazy too tired to get off the couch 6th generation democrat/welfare people women squirting out kids..

And oh, 4.5 million illegal immigrants in the federal prison system.. $65 per day each
 
so it does not bother you at all that some children just cannot get medicine or health care when needed--i know it's easy to call them all welfare babies or illegals, but damn, the child did nothing....
 
The health care system in Canada can be great and not so great. Waiting times for the ER, surgeries and tests (like colonoscopies) are long, but if you're in an emergency, you get treated asap.
Sure we get taxed for health care, but it's like paying a really low cost insurance premium for a great health care plan.
And it's true about the immigrants, they infest the hosp's with their 15 kids. When I had to go to the ER last years, there was an entire immigrant family in there, with their kids, laughing (not looking very sick) and they sat on the floor and all ate lunch. We were all disgusted!
Immigrants get FREE health care after ONLY 3 months of being here. They don't have to be citizens. It's pathetic, but it is what it is!
I also have private insurance through work where I can get a MRI in days instead of months.
But yeah, ultimately, I would rather know I can see any dr at any time for any ailment. And walk into any ER if there is something wrong and not have to dish thousands out of my pocket in one shot.
 
Big Rick Rock said:
Peeps in the USA what are your thoughts on the issue? Should we have Socialized health care?



Peeps abroad in countries that Universal healthcare already. Whats your experience dealing with it in your country?

Nope.

And to reply to the "people move to France to get health care" 20% of France is now Muslim or African. Who the hell wouldn't move to France and get free health care there (that is substandard) yet a hell of a lot better than health care that is virtually non-existent in Africa and the Middle East.
 
eddymerckx said:
so it does not bother you at all that some children just cannot get medicine or health care when needed--i know it's easy to call them all welfare babies or illegals, but damn, the child did nothing....


not true, any child can get health care in the usa.. any idiot that walks, or crawls in off the street gets health care..

and especially any woman that shows up in the ER in labor gives birth to a USA citizen.. and is immediately placed on welfare..
 
blueta2 said:
The health care system in Canada can be great and not so great. Waiting times for the ER, surgeries and tests (like colonoscopies) are long, but if you're in an emergency, you get treated asap.
Sure we get taxed for health care, but it's like paying a really low cost insurance premium for a great health care plan.
And it's true about the immigrants, they infest the hosp's with their 15 kids. When I had to go to the ER last years, there was an entire immigrant family in there, with their kids, laughing (not looking very sick) and they sat on the floor and all ate lunch. We were all disgusted!
Immigrants get FREE health care after ONLY 3 months of being here. They don't have to be citizens. It's pathetic, but it is what it is!
I also have private insurance through work where I can get a MRI in days instead of months.
But yeah, ultimately, I would rather know I can see any dr at any time for any ailment. And walk into any ER if there is something wrong and not have to dish thousands out of my pocket in one shot.

brr5.jpg
 
blueta2 said:
lol.........well I would take his offer! ;-)


:heart:

I think I should atleast make him take me out to dinner first.
 
SpyWizard said:
not true, any child can get health care in the usa.. any idiot that walks, or crawls in off the street gets health care..

and especially any woman that shows up in the ER in labor gives birth to a USA citizen.. and is immediately placed on welfare..


but that does not speak to the issue of the working poor--which is the fastest growing segment of our society--
 
eddymerckx said:
but that does not speak to the issue of the working poor--which is the fastest growing segment of our society--


depends on how you qualify "working poor"..

and we can both probably do the statistics dance.. so lets not go there..

I agree with you it's not perfect..

but i worked 2 full time jobs 40-45 hours each per week..

both had health insurance.. did that for 4 yrs in my mid 30's.. so working poor is subjective..
 
how about if you do some form of civil service for 4 years then you can have access to a social health care system paid for by the working tax dollars. This way the rich have the option to do their civil work but have to pay for health care if they don't. Also the federal taxes cover the health care of the poor who did civil work to help improve the rich peoples country.

any thoughts on this?
 
Megalomaniac said:
how about if you do some form of civil service for 4 years then you can have access to a social health care system paid for by the working tax dollars. This way the rich have the option to do their civil work but have to pay for health care if they don't. Also the federal taxes cover the health care of the poor who did civil work to help improve the rich peoples country.

any thoughts on this?


many will say that is exactly what "rich " people do now with the military.. and there is some truth to it..

also, many believe mandatory civil, or military service should be required for voting rights..

now that i would support..
 
SpyWizard said:
many will say that is exactly what "rich " people do now with the military.. and there is some truth to it..

also, many believe mandatory civil, or military service should be required for voting rights..

now that i would support..

Ya that is what I'm pulling it from. I'm poor and just had knee surgery done in the military. I'm talking about a similar system except you don't have to do the full 20 years to get the insurance like now. Also not everyone is suited for the military so they could do other civil things like maybe nursing or building roads or even some civil section to help the envirorment. Make the fucking rich pay to improve the world, sure they get to be rich but they should have to pay to stay there and improve it.

Why would 75% of the US population not support this?
 
Megalomaniac said:
Ya that is what I'm pulling it from. I'm poor and just had knee surgery done in the military. I'm talking about a similar system except you don't have to do the full 20 years to get the insurance like now. Also not everyone is suited for the military so they could do other civil things like maybe nursing or building roads or even some civil section to help the envirorment. Make the fucking rich pay to improve the world, sure they get to be rich but they should have to pay to stay there and improve it.

Why would 75% of the US population not support this?


that's the same argument for a flat tax..

the reality of things though is that the majority of the tax is paid by the top 5%..

Think about it.. a person that is "working poor" pays very little tax.. if any at all..

someone that creates wealth creates many different streams of revenue.. True, the more money I earn as an example the more tax i pay, but... now i went to a situation where i pay even less tax due to paying a good accountant and owning a business.. but that's the system that we are in..

remember Social security goes into the general fund..

that's what's messed up..
 
SpyWizard said:
that's the same argument for a flat tax..

the reality of things though is that the majority of the tax is paid by the top 5%..

Think about it.. a person that is "working poor" pays very little tax.. if any at all..

someone that creates wealth creates many different streams of revenue.. True, the more money I earn as an example the more tax i pay, but... now i went to a situation where i pay even less tax due to paying a good accountant and owning a business.. but that's the system that we are in..

remember Social security goes into the general fund..

that's what's messed up..

Ya that is why I think we need a civil service program so bad in this country. At least you would get SOMETHING out of the lazy ass fucks who are just draining they system. Let the rich buy out of it and help pay for it. Who would lose that way? Someone give help me out here before I run for president on that plan.
 
Where do I start?

First and foremost if the U.S. government takes over our healthcare then they will control the prices. If they control the prices that means they cut the prices so they can afford the bill. That means there isn't enough money coming in to pay healthcare professionals what they are worth. Which means doctors are making a portion of the income they are accustomed to but they are swamped with work because everybody and their brother is running to the doctor for every little nick, bruise and cold they get. On top of that, because of the increased headache and decreased pay, those with the ability to survive medical school will no longer be interested. This means we have to lower the standards and it won't take long until doctors will no longer be doctors at all because to do the work will only require a bachelors degree. How strange will that sound... "I have a bachelors appointment Wednesday so I won't be at work."

Earlier someone mentioned the long waiting lists for surgeries and otherwise urgent procedures. It was also mentioned that if you don't want to wait you can just run across the border and have the work done. If the U.S. adapts socialized healthcare there is no where for them or us to run to.

Socialized healthcare would be tragic in the U.S. Basic healthcare is available in the U.S. to the underprivileged. You can’t make all procedures free for all citizens. You have to draw the line somewhere. What's next, government funded plastic surgery so our citizens don't have to feel inferior to their peers? What people need to understand, as cold-hearted as it sounds, is that healthcare is not a RIGHT... it is a luxury and luxuries come at a cost.
 
My wife had my daughter in Italy. It was gross,sick,scummy and it fucking sucks big time.
They still use fucking glass bottles for iv's. glass needles. I am talking stone age type shit. They reuse every thing still. The service sucks as well. Mid birth and no doctor even in the room wtf is that shit.
 
I lived in Hong Kong for a half a year, they have the flat tax but works there. everything is private sector, it wont work here. Too many losers in the states and too many public sectors that need tax dollars to work
 
In Canada, I have no complaints. I'd had some major stuff done, but didn't have to wait too long. It seems to work well for me here.
 
Yes I think we should have it in the US, we will one day, just like our fire department and police service is socialized. No one should go without health care in the modern world, NO ONE.
 
Lestat said:
Yes I think we should have it in the US, we will one day, just like our fire department and police service is socialized. No one should go without health care in the modern world, NO ONE...
...except illegals...right?
 
ponyfitness said:
Also, hospital waiting rooms take 8 hours because every new immigrant brings their kids to the emergency room when they have a cold.

I guess there are pros and cons, but it is mostly a big pro - it is a great peace of mind to know that you can get health care anytime if you have a problem and not have to pay a dime - just wait forever. Small price IMO.


We have that too.

There was one year of my life I was in the ER 7 times (holy hell) and every time (EVERY TIME) I was there I was the only American person there. It was surreal to be there lying on a gurney counting the holes in the ceiling tile, watching the lights flicker while listening to people wailing, crying and speaking at the top of their lungs in Spanish or Portuguese. And after a while you could see the relief of whomever was on call when they got to me because we spoke the same language.

I bet that is great peace of mind.
 
SpyWizard said:
not true, any child can get health care in the usa.. any idiot that walks, or crawls in off the street gets health care..

and especially any woman that shows up in the ER in labor gives birth to a USA citizen.. and is immediately placed on welfare..

If you need triple bypass or have cancer and don't have insurance, you're fucked. They don't have to treat you. That can let you die slowly, only have to treat you when you come into the emergency room near death.
 
yes.

We already spend as much tax money on health care, per capita, as some countries that have universal health care plans. I'd say we're getting a spectacularly poor value here.
 
EnderJE said:
...except illegals...right?
We can't deny emergency services to them, but no, non citzens or perminent resident aliens would not have access to this system although you could opt in for a fee.
 
ponyfitness said:
We have it here in Canada and it's great - unless you need a big operation or an MRI or something like that. Waiting lists for surgery are insane, up to a year or more. Frankly I'd prefer the chance to pay for stuff if you want it fast, which is what most Canadians do - they go to the US and pay for it.

Also, hospital waiting rooms take 8 hours because every new immigrant brings their kids to the emergency room when they have a cold.

I guess there are pros and cons, but it is mostly a big pro - it is a great peace of mind to know that you can get health care anytime if you have a problem and not have to pay a dime - just wait forever. Small price IMO.

LOL Are you under the impression that it is different in the US?
 
I'm single, male, 25 and in perfect health. For 100% coverage no (very few anyways) questions asked coverage for just me it will be aorund $220 a month, that's no deductible insurance... I work at a place with some of the most spectacular benefits, and I'd still be paying ridiculous amounts of money to make sure I can be covered and not be out $10k if I get really sick... I'll do it, just to have the coverage. The cheap plan, on the other end of the spectrum, is only $20 a month, but that's an 80/20 plan.
 
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ed...s/2007/08/11/frances_model_healthcare_system/
Paul V. Dutton
France's model healthcare system
By Paul V. Dutton | August 11, 2007

MANY advocates of a universal healthcare system in the United States look to Canada for their model. While the Canadian healthcare system has much to recommend it, there's another model that has been too long neglected. That is the healthcare system in France.

Although the French system faces many challenges, the World Health Organization rated it the best in the world in 2001 because of its universal coverage, responsive healthcare providers, patient and provider freedoms, and the health and longevity of the country's population. The United States ranked 37.

The French system is also not inexpensive. At $3,500 per capita it is one of the most costly in Europe, yet that is still far less than the $6,100 per person in the United States.

An understanding of how France came to its healthcare system would be instructive in any renewed debate in the United States.

That's because the French share Americans' distaste for restrictions on patient choice and they insist on autonomous private practitioners rather than a British-style national health service, which the French dismiss as "socialized medicine." Virtually all physicians in France participate in the nation's public health insurance, Sécurité Sociale.

Their freedoms of diagnosis and therapy are protected in ways that would make their managed-care-controlled US counterparts envious. However, the average American physician earns more than five times the average US wage while the average French physician makes only about two times the average earnings of his or her compatriots. But the lower income of French physicians is allayed by two factors. Practice liability is greatly diminished by a tort-averse legal system, and medical schools, although extremely competitive to enter, are tuition-free. Thus, French physicians enter their careers with little if any debt and pay much lower malpractice insurance premiums.

Nor do France's doctors face the high nonmedical personnel payroll expenses that burden American physicians. Sécurité Sociale has created a standardized and speedy system for physician billing and patient reimbursement using electronic funds.

It's not uncommon to visit a French medical office and see no nonmedical personnel. What a concept. No back office army of billing specialists who do daily battle with insurers' arcane and constantly changing rules of payment.

Moreover, in contrast to Canada and Britain, there are no waiting lists for elective procedures and patients need not seek pre-authorizations. In other words, like in the United States, "rationing" is not a word that leaves the lips of hopeful politicians. How might the French case inform the US debate over healthcare reform?

National health insurance in France stands upon two grand historical bargains -- the first with doctors and a second with insurers.

Doctors only agreed to participate in compulsory health insurance if the law protected a patient's choice of practitioner and guaranteed physicians' control over medical decision-making. Given their current frustrations, America's doctors might finally be convinced to throw their support behind universal health insurance if it protected their professional judgment and created a sane system of billing and reimbursement.

French legislators also overcame insurance industry resistance by permitting the nation's already existing insurers to administer its new healthcare funds. Private health insurers are also central to the system as supplemental insurers who cover patient expenses that are not paid for by Sécurité Sociale. Indeed, nearly 90 percent of the French population possesses such coverage, making France home to a booming private health insurance market.

The French system strongly discourages the kind of experience rating that occurs in the United States, making it more difficult for insurers to deny coverage for preexisting conditions or to those who are not in good health. In fact, in France, the sicker you are, the more coverage, care, and treatment you get. Would American insurance companies cut a comparable deal?

Like all healthcare systems, the French confront ongoing problems. Today French reformers' number one priority is to move health insurance financing away from payroll and wage levies because they hamper employers' willingness to hire. Instead, France is turning toward broad taxes on earned and unearned income alike to pay for healthcare.

American advocates of mandates on employers to provide health insurance should take note. The link between employment and health security is a historical artifact whose disadvantages now far outweigh its advantages. Economists estimate that between 25 and 45 percent of the US labor force is now job-locked. That is, employees make career decisions based on their need to maintain affordable health coverage or avoid exclusion based on a preexisting condition.

Perhaps it's time for us to take a closer look at French ideas about healthcare reform. They could become an import far less "foreign" and "unfriendly" than many here might initially imagine.

Paul V. Dutton is associate professor of history at Northern Arizona University and author of "Differential Diagnoses: A Comparative History of Health Care Problems and Solutions in the United States and France," which will be published in September.

© Copyright 2007 Globe Newspaper Company.
 
biteme said:
If you need triple bypass or have cancer and don't have insurance, you're fucked. They don't have to treat you. That can let you die slowly, only have to treat you when you come into the emergency room near death.


yes, they have to treat you.. it's called medicaid...

and yes my mom is in stage 4 lung cancer..

ever hear of medicaid for aids patients?? they are treated..
 
Canadian here . .

I've never had a problem getting any treatment I need, when I need it. I'll never have to mortgage my house or go bankrupt to get healthcare.

IMO, healthcare is a similiar boat to education. I pay taxes for schools because I'm better off if the children are educated - those are the doctors, lawyers and hamburger flippers that serve me. I pay taxes for healthcare because the economy that I'm part of is better off if the workers are in good health, their children and parents are cared for and they are able to work in the job that best fits them because they don't have to worry about 'not getting healthcare in XXX job'. The government has more incentive to ensure preventative care and concern because they're on the political hook if the system gets too expensive.

Perfect? No - but what is? I haven't yet met a human system that is perfect.
 
ponyfitness said:
We have it here in Canada and it's great - unless you need a big operation or an MRI or something like that. Waiting lists for surgery are insane, up to a year or more. Frankly I'd prefer the chance to pay for stuff if you want it fast, which is what most Canadians do - they go to the US and pay for it.

Also, hospital waiting rooms take 8 hours because every new immigrant brings their kids to the emergency room when they have a cold.

I guess there are pros and cons, but it is mostly a big pro - it is a great peace of mind to know that you can get health care anytime if you have a problem and not have to pay a dime - just wait forever. Small price IMO.
I think I will opt for NO here in the u.s...I like being able to know that my son gets his yearly ekg's without having to wait on a wait list, thanks though..
I honestly do not see any pro's that are worth it all!
 
All you have to do is just look at the socialized systems in the U.S. Think about what those professionals get paid - teachers, police officers, fire fighters, etc. do you really think anyone that wants to be a doctor is going to go to school for 8 yrs + residency to make government funded wages. Look at my post on page four for more details.
 
marvelous54 said:
All you have to do is just look at the socialized systems in the U.S. Think about what those professionals get paid - teachers, police officers, fire fighters, etc. do you really think anyone that wants to be a doctor is going to go to school for 8 yrs + residency to make government funded wages. Look at my post on page four for more details.
After college, graduate school, and medical school, I finished with almost a quarter million dollars of debt.

Although wages will likely not be as high in a socialized health system, they will always remain fairly good. Physicians in the UK and Canada still do quite well. Still, you raise a valid point. It's hard to justify that much debt when you are going to be putting life on hold for 12 years while you pursue medicine, and then have a mediocre salary (lots of long hours means your salary isn't as high as you think; the salary isn't that high because of significant loan dues).
 
marvelous54 said:
All you have to do is just look at the socialized systems in the U.S. Think about what those professionals get paid - teachers, police officers, fire fighters, etc. do you really think anyone that wants to be a doctor is going to go to school for 8 yrs + residency to make government funded wages. Look at my post on page four for more details.
Personally I think police, firemen, politicians, and most teachers make to much money already.
I'd have no problem paying a fireman top dollar for the time he's in a burning building, but shit, they make big bucks sitting around the firehouse, training at Gold's Gym (a fact here in Vegas - fucking stairmaster hogs), and shopping at the supermarket. Police? Hell they get top dollar for sitting on their ass in a casino eating a free lobster dinner - fuck those greedy kunts. And teachers - they make 12 months of income in 9 months, boo fuckin' hoo.
If any public employee deserve more money it's our combat forces in the sandbox. I'm takin' about the trigger pullers, not the REMF's!
 
Angel said:
I think I will opt for NO here in the u.s...I like being able to know that my son gets his yearly ekg's without having to wait on a wait list, thanks though..
I honestly do not see any pro's that are worth it all!
It's too bad that you haven't seen the other side to understand the benefit. Sure, it's not perfect. But then again, neither side really is.

Funny, you and Need2 are two people whom I thought would of seen the benefit. Ah well, I guess you can never really tell...
 
Powerbuilder333 said:
Personally I think police, firemen, politicians, and most teachers make to much money already.
I'd have no problem paying a fireman top dollar for the time he's in a burning building, but shit, they make big bucks sitting around the firehouse, training at Gold's Gym (a fact here in Vegas - fucking stairmaster hogs), and shopping at the supermarket. Police? Hell they get top dollar for sitting on their ass in a casino eating a free lobster dinner - fuck those greedy kunts. And teachers - they make 12 months of income in 9 months, boo fuckin' hoo.
If any public employee deserve more money it's our combat forces in the sandbox. I'm takin' about the trigger pullers, not the REMF's!

What are you talking about "top dollar"? Those professions on average start below 35g's a year.
 
marvelous54 said:
What are you talking about "top dollar"? Those professions on average start below 35g's a year.

http://www.allbusiness.com/north-america/united-states-new-york/1147772-1.html $103,000 average police pay. That doesn't include the typical New York kick backs an officer can expect, nor the extra income that can be earned by selling stolen drugs. IMO a typical high school grad, without any college can expect to top out at 1/2 million a year on any New York police agency, including all the "perks". Don't be naive - for every Serpico there's a hundred that don't play it straight.
 
marvelous54 said:
What are you talking about "top dollar"? Those professions on average start below 35g's a year.

Maybe in rural Alabama...
 
You guys are talking about city officers. They are hardly relevant in this argument. Actually if you want to look at it from that perspective it makes your argument even less legible. In your example professionals make more money based on the prosperity of the communities in which they work. That would mean wealthy neighborhoods would have the ability to pay their Doctors well and poor neighborhoods, which are supposedly the people you are trying to help, would get the scrubs (i.e. rural Alabama – an example of the socioeconomic group we are trying to help). I don’t see how that helps them. If you want to look at true government situations you have to look at larger government entities. In other words look at state trooper salaries and school teacher salaries that are paid on a state scale without local pay addendums. I know quite a few Doctors who have moved to the U.S. because their governments adopted socialized healthcare programs and the money was just not worth the liability.
 
^^^ I agree with your basic argument that socialized medicine would be bad for this country.
As corrupt as born Americans can be, Flips (so prevelant in Vegas hospitals) take it to another level.
 
Top Bottom