Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

smartest peeps on ef?

Status
Not open for further replies.
layinback

layinback

New member
so many come to mind.......


right off the top of my head


bino, spartacus, jack sparrow, MM, stilleto, java, mavafanculo

later i will clarify my choices and probably add some more
 
GUARDIAN said:
:(
Click to expand...




brotha, i know you is smart :)

you probably masturbate to differential equations but there's so

many here..............


btw- i've sent you k messages praising your insight and knowledge :heart:
 
thanks!

i would include smuffy on the list.
but there are others too. fer sure.
 
Depend on what type of smart you mean? There are different types of smart.

Besides those that you have already mentioned:

Samoth, AAP, Nelson Montana, Omega (he just hides it a lot), Heatherrae, and as of late, Razorguns has been impressing me

:)
 
Tatyana said:
Depend on what type of smart you mean? There are different types of smart.

Besides those that you have already mentioned:

Samoth, AAP, Nelson Montana, Omega (he just hides it a lot), Heatherrae, and as of late, Razorguns has been impressing me

:)
Click to expand...

jesus christ........this thread lost all credibility. 3 names on there that should never be near the word "smart"
 
hahaha..i was gonna make this thread myself.

i would say (based on both street and books. the true definition of smart )

KB (RIP)
nimbus
layinback
MM
GD
myself
subz (for his age)
Nef
blueta
jnevs
jackangel
velv

I think there's a few peeps on here who are very book smart but not street smart enough.
 
also, even though gambino is an EF legend, and i like him...no. how else can you base such a decision, except to consider how one handles himself in a discussion?

off the top of my head: samoth, jayc9, tatyana, java, cw, velvett. i'm not referring merely to intelligence, but also how they interact with others in a thread.
 
stilleto said:
thanks!

i would include smuffy on the list.
but there are others too. fer sure.
Click to expand...
Thanks!!

I'm just a pretty good speller so it makes me seem more intelligent than I really am. It's kind of intimidating to others. That's why Biteme wanted to have an IQ test-taking contest with me.
 
lmao at bleak reality
lol
and thanks layinback, helluva compliement
and nimbus has got a good math brain, i wish i had that
 
jackangel said:
also, even though gambino is an EF legend, and i like him...no. how else can you base such a decision, except to consider how one handles himself in a discussion?

off the top of my head: samoth, jayc9, tatyana, java, cw, velvett. i'm not referring merely to intelligence, but also how they interact with others in a thread.
Click to expand...
i get carried away with the poly stuff and my points get muddled and cloudy with passion.
trying to stay away from those types of discussions, both online and in irl
 
thanks bro

not just kissing back cuz I've said it before, but I'd have you on my list for your keen insights into the human psyche' - a gift not many have
 
PuddleMonkey said:
healother
Youngguns
holy_ghost
Yonkers
Click to expand...

Ok is this the anti-smart representation?

holy_ghost, ok lad, just a cut and paste expert that recommended WAY too much gear to people.

I have no idea about the others.

BTW, could someone hook me up with some of the most dumb things that Younguns has said on this board?
 
Let me tell you why i think this thread is gonna suck (not the idea layingback.. but the feedback/posts)

First of all, i don't think alot of people understand the true definition of "smart". Intelligence is a variety of things and factors into everything from social skills/human interaction, problem solving, reason, learn from mistakes and the ability to process information.
Yeah you can be book smart...a math or science whiz, but does that make you a genius? No. The most intelligent and successful people i know or have ever met have capabilities beyond just one portion of knowledge or area.
Knowledge in itself is a portion of being intelligent, but is far from the end all. You know how many math geniuses or engineers can't talk to stranger without dying of anxiety?


Secondly, i already noticed a large age bias. most of the people mentioned are 35+...(no disrespect to them of course)
I think often people equate age with intelligence. It's just not true. Yes, one may become smarter from life experiences assuming they have been in many different situations and environments. Layinback is a perfect example of that...someone who's been through several lifetimes of experience yet has very little formal education. Obviously in his case (like myself) he makes it a habit to gain knowledge on his own which is why he's so well spoken and articulate. However, that is not everybody.

You're smart relative to where you are in life. that's why i mentioned some of the younger peeps on this forum. i bet you're gonna see alot of people not mentioned because of that.

just a rant, really
 
calveless wonder said:
Let me tell you why i think this thread is gonna suck (not the idea layingback.. but the feedback/posts)

First of all, i don't think alot of people understand the true definition of "smart". Intelligence is a variety of things and factors into everything from social skills/human interaction, problem solving, reason, learn from mistakes and the ability to process information.
Yeah you can be book smart...a math or science whiz, but does that make you a genius? No. The most intelligent and successful people i know or have ever met have capabilities beyond just one portion of knowledge or area.
Knowledge in itself is a portion of being intelligent, but is far from the end all. You know how many math geniuses or engineers can't talk to stranger without dying of anxiety?


Secondly, i already noticed a large age bias. most of the people mentioned are 35+...(no disrespect to them of course)
I think often people equate age with intelligence. It's just not true. Yes, one may become smarter from life experiences assuming they have been in many different situations and environments. Layinback is a perfect example of that...someone who's been through several lifetimes of experience yet has very little formal education. Obviously in his case (like myself) he makes it a habit to gain knowledge on his own which is why he's so well spoken and articulate. However, that is not everybody.

You're smart relative to where you are in life. that's why i mentioned some of the younger peeps on this forum. i bet you're gonna see alot of people not mentioned because of that.
Click to expand...


lol@alotx2
 
Mavafanculo said:
thanks bro

not just kissing back cuz I've said it before, but I'd have you on my list for your keen insights into the human psyche' - a gift not many have
Click to expand...


thanks mava

i have very little formal education but i've proly read a thousand books

or so in the last 25 yrs and i have always had smart challenging friends

who keep me on my toes.

my keen insight into the human psyche is a product of genetics and

survival. i love psychology and i'm a huge fan of winnicott and jung.
 
Bino said:
lmao at bleak reality
lol
and thanks layinback, helluva compliement
and nimbus has got a good math brain, i wish i had that
Click to expand...

I think that's what he's adept to, but i wouldn't have mentioned him if he didn't have more than that. he's also extremely witty, can pretty much figure out anything, and has very good social perception.
 
I have to return the compliment LB. You possess the ability to lay down intelligence in type that I wish I had. You have the #1 spot for intelligence on EF until someone overthrows you, in which case, I shall bomb him/her until I run out of karmas.

Having said that, some other favs are:
Hammy (the greatest poster ever)
Mava
Subz
Mr. dB
Nimbus
Heather
AAP
Bluebird
Gambino
Smurfy
Lumberg
Digger
ATW

I dig almost everyone here, but these are just some of the posters that make me think on a regular basis.
 
layinback said:
so many come to mind.......


right off the top of my head


bino, spartacus, jack sparrow, MM, stilleto, java, mavafanculo

later i will clarify my choices and probably add some more
Click to expand...

No disrespect LB, but these threads and the 'who would I rape' and 'the who would I dine with', and the 'perfect EF composite woman' are a big clusterfuck of strokes. C&C has turned into high school, thank god me was smart enough ta gets out when I was 16.
 
calveless wonder said:
Let me tell you why i think this thread is gonna suck (not the idea layingback.. but the feedback/posts)

First of all, i don't think alot of people understand the true definition of "smart". Intelligence is a variety of things and factors into everything from social skills/human interaction, problem solving, reason, learn from mistakes and the ability to process information.
Yeah you can be book smart...a math or science whiz, but does that make you a genius? No. The most intelligent and successful people i know or have ever met have capabilities beyond just one portion of knowledge or area.
Knowledge in itself is a portion of being intelligent, but is far from the end all. You know how many math geniuses or engineers can't talk to stranger without dying of anxiety?


Secondly, i already noticed a large age bias. most of the people mentioned are 35+...(no disrespect to them of course)
I think often people equate age with intelligence. It's just not true. Yes, one may become smarter from life experiences assuming they have been in many different situations and environments. Layinback is a perfect example of that...someone who's been through several lifetimes of experience yet has very little formal education. Obviously in his case (like myself) he makes it a habit to gain knowledge on his own which is why he's so well spoken and articulate. However, that is not everybody.

You're smart relative to where you are in life. that's why i mentioned some of the younger peeps on this forum. i bet you're gonna see alot of people not mentioned because of that.

just a rant, really
Click to expand...


excellent points!!!

intelligence is very subjective. a well rounded intellect is probably the

ticket. if you can perform higher math but can't change a flat tire.......

there're many modalities of *smart.* i would imagine that verbal

intelligence and the ability to articulate complex emotions and ideas

are indispensable on internet chat boards. this ability could also create

the illusion that someone is actually smarter than they really are lol.

of course this thread is very provocative and very few people consider

themselves dumb. it is meant to elicit this type of feedback CW.
 
for gear and workin out .. who is what most of this site is based on .. i would say
omega
wulfgar
nelson
would be top 3 .. lotta gears mods and mentors would be cloze behind .. but those are top dogs imo
 
as i read others list i'm like yes he's \ she's smart.

my list was by no means comprehensive either.

we all appreciate the smart folk in real life so i don't

see this as a juvenile attempt to jerk and to get jerked

off. i can do my own jerking off. after 30+ years i have

a PHD in jerking off :rolleyes:
 
layinback said:
as i read others list i'm like yes he's \ she's smart.

my list was by no means comprehensive either.

we all appreciate the smart folk in real life so i don't

see this as a juvenile attempt to jerk and to get jerked

off. i can do my own jerking off. after 30+ years i have

a PHD in jerking off :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
Wanna come jerk me off? :qt:
 
layinback said:
as i read others list i'm like yes he's \ she's smart.

my list was by no means comprehensive either.

we all appreciate the smart folk in real life so i don't

see this as a juvenile attempt to jerk and to get jerked

off. i can do my own jerking off. after 30+ years i have

a PHD in jerking off :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

You're already popular LB, you don't need to set up such a divisive thread. I thought you were cooler than that.
 
PuddleMonkey said:
Nervous about game 7?
Click to expand...



you would be smart if you had a brain transplant :evil:


actually omega and i were talking about your wit

and smarts a couple nights ago.

he said, " puddlemonkey is much smarter than he

appears on the board"

i said, " i hope so"
 
PuddleMonkey said:
Me either, NO will probably beat them by 20 again.


The Lakers on the other hand, NO doesn't stand a chance.
Click to expand...

Kobe could beat NO by himself.
 
PuddleMonkey said:
Me either, NO will probably beat them by 20 again.


The Lakers on the other hand, NO doesn't stand a chance.
Click to expand...

who's gonna guard chris paul?

they split the season series 2-2..........so it should be fairly evenly matched. Homecourt is actually gonna be HUGE in that series. Lakers got it by 1 fuckin game (the last game of the regular season that the hornets lost).
 
I just gotta make split second calculations for cardiac drugs and joules. But gosh, we don't even use a computer. It's more of a trade. Hell, most people don't even know the difference between an EMT and Paramedic. Besides EF, I only used a computer for those 6 years of college.
I wash myself with a rag on a stick.
 
hurricane187 said:
for gear and workin out .. who is what most of this site is based on .. i would say
omega
wulfgar
nelson
would be top 3 .. lotta gears mods and mentors would be cloze behind .. but those are top dogs imo
Click to expand...
good bro material
 
I have met some very intellectually brilliant people who didn't have enough sense not to come in out of a blizzard, seriously.

There is a HUGE difference between "book smart" and "life smart." That being said, the real question is, are we talking purely I.Q., E.Q., some combination of the two, plain old vast stores of general knowledge, or common sense?

Reading a large number of books, attaining hours and hours of college credits, that's cool, but IMO the most useful knowledge is having information you can actually pull up and use, have available at your mental fingertips, so to speak, as opposed to theory.

Untested intellectual information impresses me a lot less than real life, hands on know how.
 
SaladFork said:
Kobe could beat NO by himself.
Click to expand...

that's just fuckin stupid and shows you have no clue about basketball.(i'll forgive you since your team is about as relevant as euro disney)

new orleans is one of the best defensive teams in the league. they split the regular season series 2-2...and one of the games NO lost was close.

lakers had a better record by 1 GAME...and thats because NO lost on the last day of the regular season and the lakers won. home court will play a huge factor.

no one on the lakers can even come close to guarding chris paul. chandler can shut down gasol.

yeah kobe will get his, but if they can take away gasol's production the face of that team completely changes.

NO is WAY better than utah, and look how utah almost brought them to a game 7

The x factor matchup will be david west vs lamar odom.

calling it now
 
calveless wonder said:
that's just fuckin stupid and shows you have no clue about basketball.(i'll forgive you since your team is about as relevant as euro disney)

new orleans is one of the best defensive teams in the league. they split the regular season series 2-2...and one of the games NO lost was close.

lakers had a better record by 1 GAME...and thats because NO lost on the last day of the regular season and the lakers won. home court will play a huge factor.

no one on the lakers can even come close to guarding chris paul. chandler can shut down gasol.

yeah kobe will get his, but if they can take away gasol's production the face of that team completely changes.

NO is WAY better than utah, and look how utah almost brought them to a game 7
Click to expand...

I'm sorry bro, I take it back :worried:
 
layinback said:
you would be smart if you had a brain transplant :evil:


actually omega and i were talking about your wit

and smarts a couple nights ago.

he said, " puddlemonkey is much smarter than he

appears on the board"

i said, " i hope so"
Click to expand...


lol I use the forum out of boredom and for fun. I see no advantage to having a lot of serious or intellectual conversations on-line. Everybody knows the internet was created solely for dating purposes.
 
PuddleMonkey said:
lol I use the forum out of boredom and for fun. I see no advantage to having a lot of serious or intellectual conversations on-line. Everybody knows the internet was created solely for dating purposes.
Click to expand...

+1

And porn.
 
PuddleMonkey said:
lol I use the forum out of boredom and for fun. I see no advantage to having a lot of serious or intellectual conversations on-line. Everybody knows the internet was created solely for dating purposes.
Click to expand...
yep


I found my husband on EliteFitness!!
 
musclemom said:
I have met some very intellectually brilliant people who didn't have enough sense not to come in out of a blizzard, seriously.

There is a HUGE difference between "book smart" and "life smart." That being said, the real question is, are we talking purely I.Q., E.Q., some combination of the two, plain old vast stores of general knowledge, or common sense?

Reading a large number of books, attaining hours and hours of college credits, that's cool, but IMO the most useful knowledge is having information you can actually pull up and use, have available at your mental fingertips, so to speak, as opposed to theory.

Untested intellectual information impresses me a lot less than real life, hands on know how.
Click to expand...

If you can't apply 'book smart' it is completely useless as well.

I work with a seriously intelligent chap, it is almost frightening.

But I think he has Aspberger's syndrome, and he is completely socially inept.

That has held him back so much it is ridiculous.
 
PuddleMonkey said:
Doesn't matter, NO wont win in LA.
Click to expand...

they beat them in LA and lost the 2nd game they played there by 3 points....

granted, it's the regular season but that obviously means they're capable.

i can't wait
 
BlueBird said:
You're already popular LB, you don't need to set up such a divisive thread. I thought you were cooler than that.
Click to expand...


why is it divisive a thread? so far all i see are peeps giving opinions

and dissecting the concept of intelligence. if people are insecure about

their intelligence and not being mentioned, that's no fault of mine.

we have no problem with threads that showcase physical attributes or

the lack of lol. the cerebral is a much more important albeit subjective

aspect of the human condition.

i'm not opposed to being popular but it is not necessary and i like to

broach pink elephants from time to time.

lulu you are scary smart. some of your post read like poetry. you clearly

have a genius for art and words. i don't understand your protestations.
 
1lulos.jpg
 
Tatyana said:
If you can't apply 'book smart' it is completely useless as well.

I work with a seriously intelligent chap, it is almost frightening.

But I think he has Aspberger's syndrome, and he is completely socially inept.

That has held him back so much it is ridiculous.
Click to expand...
Ditto, same thing here. I worked for a man who was mathematically brilliant, who was categorically incapable of basic organization and life skills and his social skills were hopeless. The only way he could get a wife was to buy one from overseas. He paid his personal assistants an obscene amount of money because he KNEW he was a nightmare to work for but needed someone with a good head on their shoulders to manage almost his entire life.
 
PuddleMonkey said:
Don't apologize, he's the one that bet me the Cowboys would win the SuperBowl. They didn't even win 1 playoff game :D
Click to expand...

I'm kinda like a girl when it comes to sports... I like teams based on how cool their logo is and if it matches my outfit. (did I just say that?)
 
layinback said:
why is it divisive a thread? so far all i see are peeps giving opinions

and dissecting the concept of intelligence. if people are insecure about

their intelligence and not being mentioned, that's no fault of mine.

we have no problem with threads that showcase physical attributes or

the lack of lol. the cerebral is a much more important albeit subjective

aspect of the human condition.

i'm not opposed to being popular but it is not necessary and i like to

broach pink elephants from time to time.

lulu you are scary smart. some of your post read like poetry. you clearly

have a genius for art and words. i don't understand your protestations.
Click to expand...

drun.jpg
 
SaladFork said:
I'm kinda like a girl when it comes to sports... I like teams based on how cool their logo is and if it matches my outfit. (did I just say that?)
Click to expand...
Yes, you just said that. And I have it on tape.
 
layinback said:
why is it divisive a thread? so far all i see are peeps giving opinions

and dissecting the concept of intelligence. if people are insecure about

their intelligence and not being mentioned, that's no fault of mine.

we have no problem with threads that showcase physical attributes or

the lack of lol. the cerebral is a much more important albeit subjective

aspect of the human condition.

i'm not opposed to being popular but it is not necessary and i like to

broach pink elephants from time to time.

lulu you are scary smart. some of your post read like poetry. you clearly

have a genius for art and words. i don't understand your protestations.
Click to expand...
Sweetie, let old Musclemom give you a little motherly advice, the most intelligent person is the one who doesn't go around telling everyone else in the room how much smarter he is than everyone else. Nor will he be the one using fifty cent words in an affected manner when a twenty-five cent word used properly would sound better.

Half of the equation of intelligence is knowing the difference between when you should speak and when you shouldn't.

Making a purely sweeping statement on the subject, scientists, neurologists, psychologists, sociologists, and behavioralists can't agree on how to measure intelligence. There are many different types of intelligence and there is just no simple way to benchmark or categorize it. That's why no one really knows which is smarter, dogs or cats, seriously. We can't figure out how to correctly measure human intelligence, how can we measure animal intelligence?

I've known very intelligent people who couldn't string half a dozen words together intelligibly in writing. I've also known total idiots who wrote beautifully. I've known brilliant artists who were mathematical retards and science and math geniuses who were incapable of balancing their checkbook.

The real question is, when you say smart, what kind of intelligence, exactly, are you wondering about?
 
I'm marrying MuscleMom someday I swear to God. We shall have a child, and that child will rule the world and bang strippers.
 
jack sparrow said:
I'm marrying MuscleMom someday I swear to God. We shall have a child, and that child will rule the world and bang strippers.
Click to expand...
No Jack, I'm sorry, I love you too, but I'm gonna marry Musclemom.
 
musclemom said:
Sweetie, let old Musclemom give you a little motherly advice, the most intelligent person is the one who doesn't go around telling everyone else in the room how much smarter he is than everyone else. Nor will he be the one using fifty cent words in an affected manner when a twenty-five cent word used properly would sound better.

Half of the equation of intelligence is knowing the difference between when you should speak and when you shouldn't.

Making a purely sweeping statement on the subject, scientists, neurologists, psychologists, sociologists, and behavioralists can't agree on how to measure intelligence. There are many different types of intelligence and there is just no simple way to benchmark or categorize it. That's why no one really knows which is smarter, dogs or cats, seriously. We can't figure out how to correctly measure human intelligence, how can we measure animal intelligence?

I've known very intelligent people who couldn't string half a dozen words together intelligibly in writing. I've also known total idiots who wrote beautifully. I've known brilliant artists who were mathematical retards and science and math geniuses who were incapable of balancing their checkbook.

The real question is, when you say smart, what kind of intelligence, exactly, are you wondering about?
Click to expand...


Translation = Stick to posting pics of your phallus
 
jack sparrow said:
I'm marrying MuscleMom someday I swear to God. We shall have a child, and that child will rule the world and bang strippers.
Click to expand...
:qt: You are very good for my ego :bigkiss:

Well, my eldest son has fulfilled at least one of those already ... he's still only 22 so he's got some time on that world domination thing.
 
BlueBird said:
No Jack, I'm sorry, I love you too, but I'm gonna marry Musclemom.
Click to expand...

I thought she wanted to marry WhistleBritches? (like the rest of you women do)
 
BlueBird said:
No Jack, I'm sorry, I love you too, but I'm gonna marry Musclemom.
Click to expand...
Can we do a multiple wife thing? You know, like them "moron's" or some shit? I'd be down with that.
 
jack sparrow said:
Can we do a multiple wife thing? You know, like them "moron's" or some shit? I'd be down with that.
Click to expand...
I've always wanted a wife :artist:
 
Please be advised everyone, no matter how much I love strippers and their mental capacity ranging somewhere between a tree and a well trained lab monkey, my biggest turn on is intelligence.

Yeah, I said it.

So what.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

PassiveHulk
Approved Log 2025 Prep Log - Testosterone Equipoise Primobolan Insulin HGH Cycle
2 3 4 5
Replies
406
Views
37K
Raptor Rep
Raptor Rep
Dr_Strangelove
Approved Log TRT Training and Lifestyle Journal
Replies
18
Views
715
the_alcatraz
the_alcatraz
Liquid Gold Labs
  • Sticky
Silver Supplier 💎 Liquid Gold Labs Updates + Announcements 💎
Replies
11
Views
2K
MUSTANG_18
MUSTANG_18
H
Need advice. Heart transplant, now struggling with TRT?No energy
Replies
25
Views
5K
25homes
25homes
Richardbrown
Napsgear: 6 Common Dumbbell Lateral Raise Mistakes
Replies
14
Views
3K
Slyderkt
Slyderkt
Top Bottom