Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Scammer

Status
Not open for further replies.
I am finished with you as I have ALREADY proven ALL my points with you...
1. You ARE a liar
2. You always change the subject when you are caught in your lies...

And I dont want to waste anymore of my time with your BS...:o

And now everyone else can see for themselves what kind of person you REALLY are...
 
dosandojo said:
GOOD is NOT GOLDEN!!!...HUGE DIFFERENCE!!! He was a GOOD source, or RADAR would NOT have vouched for him!? RIGHT?? And his REP MUST have been GOOD (at the LEAST), for RADAR to have trusted him...RIGHT???? It is like 'I' am being blamed for something RADAR did!!!!!

Just when I thought you made your most idiotic post, you come up with one that's worse.
 
You see....I offered you a SINCERE APOLOGY...and you call me names...If you are NOT man enough to accept my apology, after I am man enough to make one...then it is on you...Peace....and for BWL, my last post makes PERFECT and LOGICAL sense!
 
If he was NOT at LEAST a GOOD (I NEVER SAID GOLDEN OR SACRED, etc.) source, then WHYYYYYYYY would/did RADAR VOUCH FOR HIM?????????????????????????? WHY would RADAR put his own Rep on the line???????? JUST ANSWER THESE TWO QUESTIONS BWL?????
 
dosandojo said:
You see....I offered you a SINCERE APOLOGY...and you call me names...If you are NOT man enough to accept my apology, after I am man enough to make one...then it is on you...Peace....and for BWL, my last post makes PERFECT and LOGICAL sense!


You posted that while I was typing your reply (and doing a few PM's at the same time) so my replies are sometimes slow :o

I think that is the BEST thing to do and with your open apology I will drop this...
 
dosandojo said:
If he was NOT at LEAST a GOOD (I NEVER SAID GOLDEN OR SACRED, etc.) source, then WHYYYYYYYY would/did RADAR VOUCH FOR HIM?????????????????????????? WHY would RADAR put his own Rep on the line???????? JUST ANSWER THESE TWO QUESTIONS BWL?????


That is something that I cant answer...

But I can tell you that I would NOT back him (and he WAS source checked through me by MULTIPLE guys)
But when a source shows up and exhibits what I consider "shady" behavior there is no way I will back them...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom