Ronnie Coleman Cycle

[XMAN.]

genetics? uhh.. i guess. more so then genetics it's about food and steroids to look like that. nobody was born to be 300lbs of muscle.

Also how do you bring up genetics and then say that just because YOU couldn't handle 2g that therefore THEY cant handle it? maybe THEY can ...genetics are different. and you obviously have no idea what you're doing..you don't just up your dosage to 2g out of nowhere...you build up so you don't shock your system, which is what the pro's do. they maybe take a gram in their early twenty's..get used to that, then take 2 g's...that suddenly doesn't work like it used to when you're on a year round cycle then up and up. eventually after 15-20 years of building up and you now weigh 280+ in the offseason then you're body can handle 4g or more.

exactly , and remember guys that these ppl are always on peptides like hgh , igf , slin... here we are not only talking about hypertrophy like regular roids, it's hyperplasia this mean they are always creating new muscle fibers and the count is increasing year by year even the worst genetics ever would have changed his base within years (and it's not necessarily dangerous if used wisely) and went way beyond his genetic limits to the need of a huge amount of roids become necessary.

 

[at(almost)ANYcost]

maybe some guys DO get bigger gains on outrageous cycles and dosages like 4g/week. it seems like a law of diminishing returns, that the body would not be able to absorb so much test. you could get sick or it would be broken down. sort of like ten aspirin is not gonna make a headache better than three aspirin.

i cant help but wondering what 4g does to your sex drive though.

Well, I can't imagine how satisfying sex would be if while trying to mount a woman, you were finding yourself feeling sick, tired, and achy due to the unbearable stress that many grams of exogenous testosterone places on your body. I have never had more sex drive than when I was A) 17 years old, and B) When I was on 1g Test-E per week.

 

[at(almost)ANYcost]

genetics? uhh.. i guess. more so then genetics it's about food and steroids to look like that. nobody was born to be 300lbs of muscle.

Also how do you bring up genetics and then say that just because YOU couldn't handle 2g that therefore THEY cant handle it? maybe THEY can ...genetics are different. and you obviously have no idea what you're doing..you don't just up your dosage to 2g out of nowhere...you build up so you don't shock your system, which is what the pro's do. they maybe take a gram in their early twenty's..get used to that, then take 2 g's...that suddenly doesn't work like it used to when you're on a year round cycle then up and up. eventually after 15-20 years of building up and you now weigh 280+ in the offseason then you're body can handle 4g or more.

My point was, once again, genetics can't be overstated where total development and the end result is concerned. You offer gram after gram of testosterone to the general populous, and although conjecture, I can nearly guarantee they will not end up getting confused with Ronnie Coleman. I can't see how anyone would disagree with me on this, considering for A CENTURY of AAS development and implementation athlete have been using and abusing superfluous amounts of drugs of all varieties, and still, no one gets Ronnie Coleman confused with anyone else - point in fact, genetics.

I was of course NOT discounting the understood baseline need for a strong calculated nutritional regimen and years spend toiling away in the gym.

Also, I am not convinced simply due to someone having a heavier body-weight and more time lifting weights, their threshold for testosterone absorption increases and/or is necessitated. Dave Palumbo, one of the most open and forthright anabolic advocates has many times outlined his most compound saturated cycle, which never exceeded 1-2g per week, and he was in fact at one point in time 300 pounds.