Props to the UGDetective and synergymuscle for testing the UG labs.

[Mavy]

OK bro.

Why you gotta be a fuck-tard? why you gotta talk completely out of your fuckin ass? Jesus this pisses me off. You know something I dont? LMFAO! What exactly am I gaining here?

I have already mentioned ... I HAVE NEVER USED ANY OF THESE LABS, and probably wont use any of them. There will always be the dissers. I just wrapped up a cycle that consisted of all HG gear, BM gear, Omnas, and Russians. I have some UG gear I am sitting on now, from neither of the labs mentioned above bro, so please stop talking out of your ass. And please tell me what I have to gain?

I just dont think that these guys should take the heat that they are taking. If you are upset, or dont want to believe a test, ... then by all means dont believe it. All I am trying to get at is that peeps have more information now regarding certains labs than they did before synergy tested a whack of them. Maybe instead of dissing them, you should be thanking them.

Mavy

 

[jcam222]

And don't even think for one minute that Mavy didn't have something to gain by posting this. You have to be vigilant in your research and keep your eyes open for the people with vested interests on the boards.

What the hell would make you say that from this thread?? He hasnt given special consideration to any one lab. Mavy is most definately a good bro just pointing out some observations. I think you are jumping to some pretty wild conspiracy theories there bro. What you say is somtimes true of some threads but on this one you are really stretching.

 

[Mavy]

What the hell would make you say that from this thread?? He hasnt given special consideration to any one lab. Mavy is most definately a good bro just pointing out some observations. I think you are jumping to some pretty wild conspiracy theories there bro. What you say is somtimes true of some threads but on this one you are really stretching.

Thanks bro, appreciate it. I am just posting what is already known. Anyone can see this by going there and looking for themselves. Just thought I would give a bump where I personally feel one is due.

 

[puddlemonkey]

And don't even think for one minute that Mavy didn't have something to gain by posting this. You have to be vigilant in your research and keep your eyes open for the people with vested interests on the boards.

Totally uncalled for. I'm on some 'source' boards where Mav posts as well and I've never seen him push any product of any kind.

 

[athlete0185]

ok well so couture labs failed this so called test. i can tell you from first hand experience the gear i had from them was anything but fake or greatly underdosed because i had never been stronger in my life than when i just came off that cycle. take it for what its worth.

 

[puddlemonkey]

ok well so couture labs failed this so called test. i can tell you from first hand experience the gear i had from them was anything but fake or greatly underdosed because i had never been stronger in my life than when i just came off that cycle. take it for what its worth.

I agree that CL are a good lab and mean well. However, some labs that mean well and are honest could get poor quality powders from their source, or possibly bunk powders all together. And if that happens they really have no control over the inferior product being made. Talking to one UG owner, he told me he always trys to overdose his products a little just in case the powders aren't as pure as they're said to be. Thats why a lot of times you'll see lab results for something labeled 250mg come out to 273mg.

 

[Mavy]

Totally uncalled for. I'm on some 'source' boards where Mav posts as well and I've never seen him push any product of any kind.

Thanks bro, a little K comin your way when I can. I dont have any hidden agenda here.

Regarding couture, I am sure that they are a good lab, the thing is that there are some things taht are out of their control. There are also fuck-ups that are bound to happen. If I had an UG lab, I would test my powders, BEFORE making my gear. And, I would use the most reputable powder guys out there, not ones where you are saving a buck. Just my thoughts. Thats the thing bro .. there are folks who have done well with most of those labs. As you can see there are just inconsistancies.

 

[Mavy]

Thats why lots of tests speak volumes. If I a lab tests out underdosed quite a bit on numerous occasions, I think its safe to say there is a problem.

 

[Mikus]

Thats why lots of tests speak volumes. If I a lab tests out underdosed quite a bit on numerous occasions, I think its safe to say there is a problem.

Couldn't agree more..Although i also agree with your previous post about using powders from well known suppliers or testing their powder's before they send them to the consumer...I also see that as a price increase to the customer..But then again, would we really complain if we had to pay a bit more to get something that we knew was right on the money as far as dosing was concerned? I wouldn't

MIke

 

[wnt2bBeast]

somehow i missed this thread ..anyway good work mavy for bringing this discussion to elite..yes UGdetective has taken a lot of heat for some of the outcomes as some have accused him of of having a hidden agenda..i think the idea is good to have this gear tested but unfortunately when tests dont come back as expected everyone will be up in arms..regarding a few of the tests with AMD..i used his var and made gains so i dont see how it could have tested out at 2.5 mg instead of 25!! also i think people should go and register to see the tests because a few of the labs like QGL and Zencall are top notch and only fell short by a few mg's..doesnt make it right that its underdosed but i aside from HG gear those 2 are at the top of my list for UG..