Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Props to the UGDetective and synergymuscle for testing the UG labs.

Mavy said:
In my opinion, a golden UG lab would..

1. Have high quality innovative prods.

2. All prods would be accurately dosed to meet or slightly exceed label claims (if you are planning for a fudge factor into your dosing, why not plan to make it on the plus side)

3. All prods would be consistantly accurately dosed!

4. Customer service is top notch. (this is actually becoming more and more important to me ... where before I really couldnt give a fuck!), and just good business ethics.

5. They stand behind their prods 100%. This just shows they have confidence in their prods, and that you should have no worries should you have any problems. If I owned a lab, and someone had a legit problem with my prods or service, say floaties in my gear for example, lol .. I would compensate them double .. both for the fuckup and for their troubles. But thats just me. Again .. this is just plain ol business ethics. Some have it, some dont.

6. They dont make stupid fuck ups! i.e., wrong labels, wrong calculated ester weights. These are stupid fuckups that should be unavoidable. How do you accidently double your dose of anavar in a capsule? lmfoa. Why is their EQ in your bottle of Deca? lmfao

Just the way I think of it. Some people are probably saying ... woah .. you are asking for quite a bit there. Well .. there are labs out there that do all of that. I wouldnt mind paying a slight higher price for all the above. It seems to me that dpharm has been one of the only ones to nail all of these. I have not personally ever used them, and I think that they are out of production now, and actually pharmagene now .. but I would use them first out of the whole list above. It will be interesting to see which labs really shine through with the sudden influx of new labs popping up lately.

Mavy


true.

you still hiking in the mountains bro??
 
I'm not surprised to see results like that. Dpharm is one of the good ones, but there are also so many bad ug labs. It seems like a new one pops up each day. I remember at one point I was taking 2grams of morning star test e and I got nothing out of it. No wood, no mood swings, no bloat. Yet I took their winny and it was great. Fck that, I only stick with the proven ones or human grade from now on.

Georgie, you said the dpharm winny and test susp. will flow through a 29g slin pin? That's awesome.
 
Mavy said:
Right ... and dont forget to mention that the Couture 400mg/ml EQ back almost 100mg underdosed! 311mg/ml.

Again its much easier to dose capsules than it is to brew injectible steroids. Basically when people mess up tab dosing ... there is not much hope for them with injectibles.
I do not understand that...its basic math getting the dose right as long as Powder is what its supposed to be. I mean 2 grams of powder makes 10 200mg/mlshots! Get your BA,BB,Oil down and bam! its there! (Never make 1 bottle at a time anyone out there thinking that... you could not get the powder anyway in such a small amount.) so 50 grams makes 25 10cc 200mg/ml bottles...why is it so hard?

Quad
 
Quadsweep said:
I do not understand that...its basic math getting the dose right as long as Powder is what its supposed to be. I mean 2 grams of powder makes 10 200mg/mlshots! Get your BA,BB,Oil down and bam! its there! (Never make 1 bottle at a time anyone out there thinking that... you could not get the powder anyway in such a small amount.) so 50 grams makes 25 10cc 200mg/ml bottles...why is it so hard?

Quad

Junk powder - Good labs would test powder before making product so they know exactly what they are dealing with.
 
All powders should always be tested for their purity, otherwise they could be grossly off. All smart UG's will do this. Unfortunately, this is always the case. Some get lazy and do not do it every time. Some of the top UG's do not buy their powders from China...that is not always the best place for ordering them. There are still some good china powder sources though.

BMJ
 
well can someone post the math here, they are saying that couture's 400mg EQ tested at 311. i know that enanthate is somewhere around 75mg of TEST per 100mg of liquid, so if you do the math with that, then 400mg would equal out to be 300mg of Test in your 400mg vial. anyone else picking up on this here or what, i know prop is closer to 82 or 85mg of test per 100mg of liquid, so bolds undec ester, im gonna guess comes in around the 75mg mark which would put 311mg a nice amount of BOLDENONE in a 400mg labeled bottle.
 
Cauliflower Ear said:
They need to test proform...so many homies on the board run it...including me...and love it...its so good i think it is overdosed...lol

i'm sure someone somewhere out there has.....maybe they'll find us.....
 
jagerbombme said:
well can someone post the math here, they are saying that couture's 400mg EQ tested at 311. i know that enanthate is somewhere around 75mg of TEST per 100mg of liquid, so if you do the math with that, then 400mg would equal out to be 300mg of Test in your 400mg vial. anyone else picking up on this here or what, i know prop is closer to 82 or 85mg of test per 100mg of liquid, so bolds undec ester, im gonna guess comes in around the 75mg mark which would put 311mg a nice amount of BOLDENONE in a 400mg labeled bottle.

THe label claim is the mg/ml of raw material in the carrier. You don't use 10ml of liquid to make 10ml of finished product. You have to deduct for the "powder weight" so that once the powder is added to the BA/BB/OIL you ned up with 10ml total, not 10ml plus the powder. This is where chemisty and mathmatics come into play. 311mg on a 400mg label claim is POOR - to say the least.
 
Top Bottom