Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Props to the UGDetective and synergymuscle for testing the UG labs.

Mavy said:
Like i said ... I know that there were arguments/doubts/flames/excuses/fights to the max on every test. I am just looking at simple facts based on the tests. Without any excuses, mixups, problems, it looks to me like dpharm would be my top choice. Even if there was a problem with their labels, or their distributors, or their powder supplier or whatever the reason may be. Those are still problems in my mind, that other labs just dont have. If my gear is labelled wrong, or ... if "my powder supplier messed up" ... well .. ya .. these are all problems ... and there are a few labs THAT DONT HAVE THESE PROBLEMS. Im sure some that didnt meet claims are still great labs. This is just one set of tests here ... but it will be interesting to see how things turn out, thats all I am saying.

Personally I dont care for hearing any excuses if I am testing my gear. Just numbers is all I want to see. For instance when I had my Orbit EQ tested, the excuse was .. "well the lab miscalculated the ester weight". Well OK ... that shows me that they are incompetant. And it makes me realise that there are labs out there who dont and have never miscalculated that. Catch my drift? Basically would rather go with a lab who has tested out on the money EVERY time (Supra comes to mind here ... many many tests, never a fail), or ones that are hit and miss?

Mavy


Nice thread Mav, K for you. Just a side note, those who liked Dpharm when they were around will probably like PharmaGene, its the same chemist Dpharm had. I'm on some PharmaGene EQ right now, and some Zencall Prop and Tren Acetate. Zencall has always been my first choice, had great results from the products. They are one of those listed above that fall into the catagory one tested slightly over and on a little under.
 
Cheers bro .... so there is no more dpharm now eh? I thought that I remember reading that, and that the guy was going to work on the pharmagene line.

Just a note, you guys. I am not trying to dis, or bump any particular labs in the list here .. infact I have never used any of them. I am just grouping them, based on what their tests thus far from synergy have revealed. So take it for what it is. If you want the exact numbers check out the site.

There are folks who do well with lots of these brands. And like I say for many, 250mg gear that is labelled at 300 is fine for some. Especially when they are getting it for such a good price. To me, I want as accurately dosed as possible, and dont mind paying for it.
 
Go dpharm! Maybe that is why I am jacked on low doses.
 
I too agree at what they are doing is a good thing. I think however, that they should pick a product from a manufacturer, and have that tested twice. There a plenty of variables that can affect a certain batch, and to me it's unfair if the variable is out of the hands of the chemist, although that is just my opinion.

I too have loved CL's products and recommend them whenever i get the chance...but overdosing var by a mg, then underdosing the next test was pretty strange. But again, that's just my opinion and i'm probably partly biased because i use CL for pretty much everything :)

Mike
 
Allgear (formally known as acgl) still stocks dpharm products, but they are not taking new customers any more, due to increased fears of being cracked down on and the fact that his supply barely meets his demands. Only those on the current VIP list can place orders.

Of course this is hearsay and BBF in no shape form or fashion has any association with any such source... this means don't ask me for a souce.
 
Mikus said:
I too agree at what they are doing is a good thing. I think however, that they should pick a product from a manufacturer, and have that tested twice. There a plenty of variables that can affect a certain batch, and to me it's unfair if the variable is out of the hands of the chemist, although that is just my opinion.


I think that you will see that the team there knows very well about this. We will have to wait and see what happens. Thats the biggest thing labs that consistantly test out on the money.

Cheers,
Mavy
 
where can we find these test results? Can you be more specific, there are many threads and forums on that web site.
 
Lestat said:
where can we find these test results? Can you be more specific, there are many threads and forums on that web site.


sign up and check out the UGotested board. Pretty cool site in general. Like I say ... they have taken lots of criticism, but they have also provided us with data that we didnt have before. I have yet to see a lab test that tests out bad, NOT take any heat from many people. Like I say there are many pissed off peeps, many politics, and many fingers being pointed. And like I said ... some people dont want to believe the tests. When a lab tests out great ... everyone is happy. lol.

Either way, I am glad that these folks are doing this. There could be nothing like this in place, and you would have to test these labs yourself if you wanted any actual feedback on numbers. At first I thought that this was going to be a gong show, and would be backed by certain labs etc, but to put these guys down for trying to help and provide information to the community is plain ignorant.

Cheers,
Mavy
 
view said:
agreed. id also like to know if the people behind the tests had something financially to gain by making a few particular labs past and rest fail.

And don't even think for one minute that Mavy didn't have something to gain by posting this. You have to be vigilant in your research and keep your eyes open for the people with vested interests on the boards.
 
Top Bottom