Prohormones: The Real Deal

[MIKERAZ]

These steroids are all more anabolic than testosterone. They also are all more anabolic than androgenic, however compared to most anabolic steroids they still have a poor differentiation of anabolic to androgenic - hence they are considered primarily androgens

To say that some AAS do not build muscle is ridiculous. You are confusing anabolism with water retention.

Once again, please read some bona fide original literature on the science of AAS. Your mind is warped by inaccurate street myths

Most of my knowledge comes from Animal or my own theories

I thought mibolerone assayed out 47 percent AS anabolic as test meaning less then test

And you kind of proved my point , Androgenic steroids wont build muscle like its common knowledge mibolerone doesnt produce gains , neither does halo, also look at methyl-tren its like 10000 times more anabolic and androgenic then test and if you'd iinject it all youd get is very hard muscles,super strength and a hell of allot of side effects .

 

[notpuff]

Want to know of a sick oral compound i heard about its, german it was a hybride of anavar and trenbolone it beat the crap out of dbol in the assay which is very hard to do , hey puffy got any PH compounds that beat dbol? uhh no

Sorry for ragging on ya puff but some of your posts makes me think you 16.

bro you need to shutup , pa has been saying you do not know what your talking about but yyour still talking!
heres something for you to chew on primo assayed very anabolic and low androgenic yet most peopel sayy primo is good for hardening ,havent really heard any talk about gaining allot of muscle on primo
as for methyl-4ad it was never mass produced and never will be so who the hell knows if its good or not , it could be great it could suck nobody knows (wish pa would make some iin his lab use iit for a week and shut you up but heres wishing)

 

[pa1ad]

Most of my knowledge comes from Animal or my own theories

I thought mibolerone assayed out 47 percent AS anabolic as test meaning less then test

And you kind of proved my point , Androgenic steroids wont build muscle like its common knowledge mibolerone doesnt produce gains , neither does halo, also look at methyl-tren its like 10000 times more anabolic and androgenic then test and if you'd iinject it all youd get is very hard muscles,super strength and a hell of allot of side effects .

I do not understand your definition of building muscles. I think you are confusing "building muscles" with water weight gain.

Please go do some real research.

 

[MIKERAZ]

I do not understand your definition of building muscles. I think you are confusing "building muscles" with water weight gain.

Please go do some real research.

Well most people get very very good gains with Dianabol and most people say anavar sucks.

I do have some knowledge of reaserched Steroids i read about a german compound that was a anavar/trenbolone hybride it assayed out better then d-bol.

 

[pa1ad]

Well most people get very very good gains with Dianabol and most people say anavar sucks.

I do have some knowledge of reaserched Steroids i read about a german compound that was a anavar/trenbolone hybride it assayed out better then d-bol.

anavar is quite potent taken at the dosages that dianabol is typically taken at. Unfortunately anavar is available only in 2.5 mg pills.

As for that hybrid steroid - let me guess. Someone told you about that didn't they? And let me guess where they heard about that from. Perhaps it was from MY RECENT ARTICLE in anabolicextreme.com and muscle monthly? Jeezus, you never fail to amaze me

 

[MIKERAZ]

Ok well maybe i gave off the wrong impression , i respect your knowledgevery much. Yes i got that from somebody, but might i remind you this whole thing started with someone talking about methyl-Ph, and my argument against it is valid Bill has said numerous times that a Diol NEVER assyed out better then its Beta-hydroxyd counterpart and that the anabolic properites of it werent good enough for release.

Went to anabolicextreme checked back issue all i see is issues from 2001 nothing else would love to read it.

 

[pa1ad]

Ok well maybe i gave off the wrong impression , i respect your knowledgevery much. Yes i got that from somebody, but might i remind you this whole thing started with someone talking about methyl-Ph, and my argument against it is valid Bill has said numerous times that a Diol NEVER assyed out better then its Beta-hydroxyd counterpart and that the anabolic properites of it werent good enough for release.

Went to anabolicextreme checked back issue all i see is issues from 2001 nothing else would love to read it.

I am so very tired of this thread. Is there any way to officially close it?

 

[cool_sub]

Yep there is a keyword list bottom right of the window titled ADMIN OPTIONS.

 

[MIKERAZ]

I am so very tired of this thread. Is there any way to officially close it?

See your kind of acknowledging that my above statement is right by not correcting it . So maybe i do have some knowledge afterall..

 

[MIKERAZ]

Also on a previous post you even acknowledged that i was right by saying methyl-Pro-hormones ARE crap because there assay LESS then 1:1 and 1:1 aint so good so less is horrible . Hell d-bol aint no less then 1:1.