This^^^^^ people seem to forget that genetic make up is very important along w/ how someone responds to steroids. Pro's in the 70's all looked like chiseled gods, even if they hadnt cycled they'd look better than 95% of us who juice, way better. Now we have top rate supps, exact doses of aas to follow, shit like insulin, thyroid meds and hgh that can take an avg guy into freak territory but could never compete at a pro level bc of basic dna. I read once that ronnie coleman stayed on 600 mgs of test and eq year rd. How do you prove or disprove that? That seems very tame to shit todays pros do, but how do u prove ronnie otherwise? Is he selectively forgetting to mention the growth, slin and t3? How many licks does it take to get to the center of a tootsie roll pop?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using EliteFitness