Please vote for the number of Platinum Members required to ban a regular member.

[Gymgurl]

I agree with Klue.....it would create insane problems

 

[bw1]

I agree with Klue.....it would create insane problems

You could send me to my room

 

[workingonmuscle]

I think 5 is fine. Sure people might gang up on someone... it will always happen. The point is that person did something in the first place to get the bomb.
I think it should take at least 500 green karma given to defuse a bomb. Even a 1000 isn't that bad. You can get that on a busy day without even posting!

Right on SLAT1. 5 is probably the best number. Running the risk of being preachy, I will add that in a voting system, an odd number of voters work best than an even one. Since, 3 seems too little and 7 too much, we are left with 5.

 

[lottalead]

I think it should be like this, (if it's possible to do it).

2 for members with less than 100 posts

3 for members with less than 200 posts

4 for members with less than 500 posts

5 for members with less than 1000 posts

6 for members with less than 5000 posts

------------

27 for Perk lol

something like this should work pretty good i'll bump ya

 

[getfitdoc]

it should cost $20 to ban someone (per person).

get 4 people to pay $20 to the site, then ban away.

 

[SSB GRAZ]

My personal opinion only MODs and ADMIN should be able to ban another member, BUT if 5-6 Plat Members all PM a MOD about the same member than that should say something and hold some weight I would think.
peace.

 

[youngguns]

My personal opinion only MODs and ADMIN should be able to ban another member, BUT if 5-6 Plat Members all PM a MOD about the same member than that should say something and hold some weight I would think.
peace.

wtf

 

[SSB GRAZ]

wtf

??

 

[exxex]

6 sounds good

 

[partagus]

Becareful plats, remember what Socrates said:

"Two ignoraminouses can out vote a wise man"

That probaly has no meaning here but I like it just the same!