Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Please vote for the number of Platinum Members required to ban a regular member.

How many Platinum Members giving bad karma should activate the banning feature.

  • 2 Plats - Four members is too many - two members would be better.

    Votes: 20 5.7%
  • 3 Plats - Two is too few - four too many - three is the right number.

    Votes: 45 12.8%
  • 4 Plats - currently 4 Platinum Members are needed - this is about right.

    Votes: 143 40.7%
  • 5 Plats - four is too few - five would be better.

    Votes: 53 15.1%
  • 6 Plats - four is too few - six would be better.

    Votes: 83 23.6%

  • Total voters
    351
3 strikes your out, should be the rule just like in anything else. If the person can't straighten up by then...well... I feel sorry for them.

my 2 cents.
 
SoKlueles said:
i think 4 is fine as long as they arent bullies

First off I think the whole thing is stupid.

That said,

Problem is, they ARE bullies. It's too easy for a guy to get 3 or 5 of his online "buddies" or just people who like to stir up shit to gang up on someone.

However positive karma is dispensed with such frequency around here, one positive nagating a bomb is too much, there might be some clueless plat who just give everyone karma that saves some douchebag from getting blacked. SO for reversal there should be more positive karma (like two positive karma hits from a plat negate ONE bomb), or a certain AMOUNT of karma, like 100 karma points received after a bomb negate it.

I know we're making things too complicated for George and his guys to program, so the short answer is, it should be much harder to black someone than it is now.
 
I personally think it should be 5. That way it is harder to gang up on someone for fun.

Whiskey
 
I voted for 6, I think it would be too easy to get 4 members together ganging up on one they just didn't like.
 
genarr3 said:
I voted for 6, I think it would be too easy to get 4 members together ganging up on one they just didn't like.
Yeah sadly most members are not mature enough for this feature it was a really great idea to.
 
genarr3 said:
I voted for 6, I think it would be too easy to get 4 members together ganging up on one they just didn't like.
nah that would NEVER happen :evil:
 
WODIN said:
I would Make it 6 different members within a 48 hour period. The reason for the time length is to allow admins to react to any abuse of the system.

Good solution IMHO

Wrongun!
 
Top Bottom