Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Patreaus's Superior Pentagon Officer: "He's an an ass-kissing little chickenshit". he said it, not me.

Re: Patreaus's Superior Pentagon Officer: "He's an an ass-kissing little chickenshit

army_stud said:
Reading your ramble cracks me up. I hate speaking intelligently on the EF boards because most of the libs won't take time to read it, and frankly I have better things to do than convince a bunch of hard headed democrats who yell the typical liberal rants. I guess I'll try!

The basis of all these arguments rests in the two-facedness of the leftist anti-war position. Clinton is your liberal hero, hailed for his supposed successes of the economy and for his 'amiable' foreign policies. However, Clinton's military sorties give falsehood to the ideal of a peaceful Democratic party... The ad hominem attacks on Bush will never cease with you libs, and to be frank, he is not the ideal President I dreamt of during his campaign. However, there are many things about Bush that I find noteworthy, especially when compared to Clinton – he is free from the dissolute image that stained Clinton's presidency and distracted everyone in the nation from, well, Osama Bin Laden and pretty much everything else. When someone attacks Bush I defend my primary choice candidate, and if Bush had kept his campaign promises I would be much more justified in doing so. In any case, libs today spend way too much time attacking Bush and way too little trying to enlighten people why he's may be wrong about certain things. And yet when you compare Bush to Clinton, Bush's estimated 200k Iraqi deaths due to malnutrition compared to Clinton's near million, Bush's direct Iraqi invasion compared to Clinton's eight years of bombing raids and stalls, Bush doesn't come up short (don't get too excited, AAP. We're not talking about dick size). Sure, I'll agree, both men appear to have made shitty decisions regarding the Iraqi situation..

To libs, being against the war is about stopping Bush and diverting attention and funding back to our fat and bloated welfare programs of the our country, kind of like the programs that feed people like AAP. It's about opposing the use of force that libs don't agree with (Iraq, Somalia) so the gov can use the force they DO agree with (Darfur). To me, being against the war is about being opposed to America and all her trimmings because I know that it will only ever make things worse. Libs couldn't convince me not to support this war because their reasons are unfilled and paper thin. For those of them who are truly ethical or care about making a difference I urge them to learn about the failures of the country, and how people can work together to meet each of our individual goals.

I guess when you become a lawyer, all the aura and awe of the law and politics just kind of melts away and turns into words, word, words. My apologies for sounding like a fat high school kid.

As far as your accusations about my character. I have given AAP ample opportunity to disprove my claims. He has access to my IP hits, so then of course he would have the same with my credit card information. I have given him written permission to search my name and figure out who I 'really' am. His refusal to do so is an obvious indication to everyone that he's already been disproved, yet afraid to admit defeat. Sound familiar?

Capt. JN
singed right at the bottom capt what a fucking lie you cant be a 19 year old capt your lies are fucking you pall.you may be good with a search but I can still catch you in some lies
 
army_stud said:
. And yet when you compare Bush to Clinton, Bush's estimated 200k Iraqi deaths due to malnutrition compared to Clinton's near million,


So clinton "caused" all those deaths in a continent where practically everyone is starving...............seriously? This is clinton's fault? When someone has a bomb land on their house, that is direct causality...........please stop being a fucking numbnut. This sentence right here is the nail in the coffin.............you're a nobody.......go home.
 
Re: Patreaus's Superior Pentagon Officer: "He's an an ass-kissing little chickenshit

needtogetaas said:
ok kid your really starting to piss me off now...

you just signed on of your post as Capt. JN.....YOUR OUT OF YOUR FUCKING MIND IF YOU THINK i AM GOING TO LET YOU SIT HERE AND ACT LIKE YOU ARE A FUCKING 19 YEAR OLD Capt OF THE USE ARMY.no fucking way pal no fucking way
Promotion to the grade of First Lieutenant usually occurs at two years of service. After an additional two years of service, the best qualified officers are promoted to Captain

it take 4 fucking god dame years to become a fucking captain you little lie sack of shit...........


never mind what any one else is saying in this thread talk to me dont be afraid just answer me boy because your pissing me of........


impersonating a officer of the us army is a federal crime kid


only other way you could have got a capt is if you had a masters when you joined witch again takes way longer then you have had time to accomplish your 19...


Lol...where is this 19 year old crap coming from? You are wrong about the qualification for Captain. Captain in an automatic rank, only Major and above require a board.
 
oh just ban his ass already..........he's obviously something in the military, but like alot of military guys' I've known, they glorify THE SHIT out of what they do. I don't know what the army does with guys who claim to be a superior officer, but I know FIRST FUCKING HAND what the Seals do if they find someone who claims to be one of em. There's even a website you can go to find out if someone who's claiming to be a seal really is one...........and if he's not, they'll ask you for his information. So walk softly here boy..........I'm sure there's alot of "real grown ass army boys" lurking around here that wouldn't mind getting your info from AAP and trackin your gally sweeping ass down.
 
jh1 said:
OMFG you are infuriating. You keep dancing around the fucking issue.

It does not apply to elitefitness they are not a fiancial organization in any way, shape or form. The biggest question that everyone had when GLBA came out was: "Does GLBA apply to me?" and alot of questions were developed to help companies understand wether or not it does.

It would simply NOT apply to elitefitness.com as a business. As an attorney you would know this. So, no... *I* am not the one with the lack of understanding. Apparently you are.


You are making things out to be cut and dry, law isn't that simple.

GLBA, CCPA, PPA, not to mention numerous state laws that vary greatly. Using someone's credit card information other than what was intended is a violation of federal law. How much are you wanting me to dig into this? I could spend a day and publish my findings. I am willing to drop the illegal use of my personal information, maybe you should stop bringing it up.

Use and disclosure
2.1 An organisation must not use or disclose personal information about an individual for a purpose (the secondary purpose) other than the primary purpose of collection unless:

(a) both of the following apply:

(i) the secondary purpose is related to the primary purpose of collection and, if the personal information is sensitive information, directly related to the primary purpose of collection;

(ii) the individual would reasonably expect the organisation to use or disclose the information for the secondary purpose; or

(b) the individual has consented to the use or disclosure; or

(c) if the information is not sensitive information and the use of the information is for the secondary purpose of direct marketing:

(i) it is impracticable for the organisation to seek the individual's consent before that particular use; and

(ii) the organisation will not charge the individual for giving effect to a request by the individual to the organisation not to receive direct marketing communications; and

(iii) the individual has not made a request to the organisation not to receive direct marketing communications; and

(iv) in each direct marketing communication with the individual, the organisation draws to the individual's attention, or prominently displays a notice, that he or she may express a wish not to receive any further direct marketing communications; and

(v) each written direct marketing communication by the organisation with the individual (up to and including the communication that involves the use) sets out the organisation's business address and telephone number and, if the communication with the individual is made by fax, telex or other electronic means, a number or address at which the organisation can be directly contacted electronically; or
 
1st Battalion, 145th Aviation Regiment.hmmmmmm
ok so here is some more ??? for you..

your unit is deployed right now any reason your not with them..
 
army_stud said:
You are making things out to be cut and dry, law isn't that simple.

GLBA, CCPA, PPA, not to mention numerous state laws that vary greatly. Using someone's credit card information other than what was intended is a violation of federal law. How much are you wanting me to dig into this? I could spend a day and publish my findings. I am willing to drop the illegal use of my personal information, maybe you should stop bringing it up.

Use and disclosure
2.1 An organisation must not use or disclose personal information about an individual for a purpose (the secondary purpose) other than the primary purpose of collection unless:

(a) both of the following apply:

(i) the secondary purpose is related to the primary purpose of collection and, if the personal information is sensitive information, directly related to the primary purpose of collection;

(ii) the individual would reasonably expect the organisation to use or disclose the information for the secondary purpose; or

(b) the individual has consented to the use or disclosure; or

(c) if the information is not sensitive information and the use of the information is for the secondary purpose of direct marketing:

(i) it is impracticable for the organisation to seek the individual's consent before that particular use; and

(ii) the organisation will not charge the individual for giving effect to a request by the individual to the organisation not to receive direct marketing communications; and

(iii) the individual has not made a request to the organisation not to receive direct marketing communications; and

(iv) in each direct marketing communication with the individual, the organisation draws to the individual's attention, or prominently displays a notice, that he or she may express a wish not to receive any further direct marketing communications; and

(v) each written direct marketing communication by the organisation with the individual (up to and including the communication that involves the use) sets out the organisation's business address and telephone number and, if the communication with the individual is made by fax, telex or other electronic means, a number or address at which the organisation can be directly contacted electronically; or



I'll ask you again to post the federal statute that makes AAP's actions illegal. GLBA does not.

That is that simple.

Further, you have no evidence to support that he used your CC information.
 
Re: Patreaus's Superior Pentagon Officer: "He's an an ass-kissing little chickenshit

army_stud said:
Lol...where is this 19 year old crap coming from? You are wrong about the qualification for Captain. Captain in an automatic rank, only Major and above require a board.
http://www.careersinthemilitary.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=services.army_officer
no I am not wrong...use you can come in as a captain but you have to have a reason for them to give you that rank..ie lots of college and as I remember you have said your self how old you were in post before...now your going to lie about that to.

your unit is deployed if your a dame captain in that unit why are you not with them now.
 
Re: Patreaus's Superior Pentagon Officer: "He's an an ass-kissing little chickenshit

needtogetaas said:
http://www.careersinthemilitary.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=services.army_officer
no I am not wrong...use you can come in as a captain but you have to have a reason for them to give you that rank..ie lots of college and as I remember you have said your self how old you were in post before...now your going to lie about that to.

your unit is deployed if your a dame captain in that unit why are you not with them now.


c'mon need2, haven't you ever had a pulled uterus? no way you can deploy with that one.....that's months of rehab. :lmao:
 
Re: Patreaus's Superior Pentagon Officer: "He's an an ass-kissing little chickenshit

needtogetaas said:
http://www.careersinthemilitary.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=services.army_officer
no I am not wrong...use you can come in as a captain but you have to have a reason for them to give you that rank..ie lots of college and as I remember you have said your self how old you were in post before...now your going to lie about that to.

your unit is deployed if your a dame captain in that unit why are you not with them now.


You are wrong, ask any officer. Captain is a given rank in the Army.

Please find that post for me.
 
Top Bottom