Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Partial Birth Abortion Ban Passes

i agree with babydoc, those are rarely if ever done.

my only problem is that if this bill passes, pro-lifers will continue to take steps to keep limiting abortions until none are allowed. i have some issues with abortion, but i do believe it should be a woman's choice, up to a certain point. it never ceases to amaze me how many men are so against abortion, but ask them to stick around and take care of a child, and where the hell are they?:rolleyes: its easy to take a stand against something when you will never be in the postion to make the choice.
 
I just can't believe with a user name like "babydoc" would be for killing babies. Please don't work my kids ok?

Tex girl, I agree with your statement about the man. But the woman should be able to do what she wants I disagree with. If she had consensual sex with someone and didn't make sure she was protected, her right to choose is over then. Because now she has another human being in her. If she didn't want to get pregnant, maybe she should have a thought a little bit before she opened her legs and said "ahhh".
 
The number of partial birth abortions or (third trimester abortions where the baby could be delivered alive) vary from 1,000 to 5,000 per year depending on the source. Even if there are only 10 it warrants a ban. I am pro choice but there is no reason for over 1,000,000 abortions to be performed annually. Also, Roe V. Wade offers little protection. It was a supreme court decision about a case in Texas. There are hundreds of ways for states to ban abortions by making life hell for the doctors, zoning, equipment, etc.. Abortion is legal because any politician who trys to ban it is committing career suicide.
 
thebabydoc said:
Ignorant fucks.

thebabydoc said:

1. No one really does these things anyway.

And that's not ignorant??

thebabydoc said:

2. You couldn't stop an Ob/Gyn from doing one if that's what he really wanted to do.

Recent laws have stopped doctors from prescribing steroids. I would think that would be easier to get away with than disposing of a baby's corpse.

thebabydoc said:

3. It probably won't hold up in court anyway.

Doesn't have to.

thebabydoc said:

4. This is nothing but a tactic to do an end-around Roe v Wade

There are plenty of ways to get around Roe v Wade. This isn't one of them.

thebabydoc said:

And guess what (ultra right-wing conservatives)? It won't work.

Wait and see.
 
Originally posted by TEXgrl

i agree with babydoc, those are rarely if ever done.

my only problem is that if this bill passes, pro-lifers will continue to take steps to keep limiting abortions until none are allowed. i have some issues with abortion, but i do believe it should be a woman's choice, up to a certain point. it never ceases to amaze me how many men are so against abortion, but ask them to stick around and take care of a child, and where the hell are they? its easy to take a stand against something when you will never be in the postion to make the choice.

I couldn't have said it better myself...terrific post.
 
curling said:


Tex girl, I agree with your statement about the man. But the woman should be able to do what she wants I disagree with. If she had consensual sex with someone and didn't make sure she was protected, her right to choose is over then. Because now she has another human being in her. If she didn't want to get pregnant, maybe she should have a thought a little bit before she opened her legs and said "ahhh".

i don't believe women should use abortion as a means of birthcontrol, i never said that. lots of times there is more to it than simply opening up and saying "ahhh" rape, molestation, something wrong with the fetus, risk to the mother, a teen ill prepared to take care of a baby, a habitual drug user who is pregnant, i could go on, but you see my point. i think to bring a child into a world where it is not wanted is equally as bad.

if you put the burden of protection on the woman alone when she is having sex, the decision should be hers alone. typical male response to place blame on a single person, then want to take away all their rights.

are you telling me every time in life you have had sex you have given thought to protection, not just against pregnancy but against disease as well?

to make abortions illegal will not stop them from going on.

to try to explain how a woman feels when faced with an unexpected pregnancy to a man is simply not possible. i'm not flaming anyone here, i'm merely stating my view of the matter, just like all you guys here. the only exception is, i've been there, as a woman, and you never will be there.
 
TEXgrl said:


i don't believe women should use abortion as a means of birthcontrol, i never said that. lots of times there is more to it than simply opening up and saying "ahhh" rape, molestation, something wrong with the fetus, risk to the mother, a teen ill prepared to take care of a baby, a habitual drug user who is pregnant,


The only one I could see is possibly rape. Since the girl had no choice in the matter. The drug user get her fixed so she can never have kids. The teen she played not she has to pay. Her parents can help her raise it since they did such a wonderful job informing her about sex or she could give it up for abortion.

i could go on, but you see my point. i think to bring a child into a world where it is not wanted is equally as bad.

With the lines so long for couples wanting children I think adoption is a better choice.

if you put the burden of protection on the woman alone when she is having sex, the decision should be hers alone. typical male response to place blame on a single person, then want to take away all their rights.

I don't put it there it is just a reality. Men don't get pregnant women do. So if I was chick you better believe I would make the dude wear protection. Like I said her right was to say no before they had sex not to kill some baby because she was dumb.

are you telling me every time in life you have had sex you have given thought to protection, not just against pregnancy but against disease as well?

Yes. I was with a few different chicks before I was married and I would always think of the consequences to the chick and to myself even if the chick was saying "cum in me" or some other wild sex talk. I wouldn't. I always thought guys were dumbasses that bust in chicks with out a condom. They should lose their right to have kids too. See I am not one sided.

to make abortions illegal will not stop them from going on.

I sure bet it would slow abortions down. Because then the chick is gambling with her life to instead of just killing her baby.
 
TEXgrl said:


i don't believe women should use abortion as a means of birthcontrol, i never said that.

That is the typical response, but it denies the reality that abortion has become a means of birth control. To argue that we should disregard the fact that it is used as a means of birth control to protect the very few that are risks to life or non-consentual is insane. Abortion is valid as a means to protect one's life in the situation that the mother is at risk or when the infant is severely malformed.

lots of times there is more to it than simply opening up and saying "ahhh" rape, molestation, something wrong with the fetus, risk to the mother, a teen ill prepared to take care of a baby, a habitual drug user who is pregnant, i could go on, but you see my point. i think to bring a child into a world where it is not wanted is equally as bad.

That argument is not valid, since the infant becomes a free individual and then has claims to its own life. Why do we stop at birth? Why not be able to terminate infants post-partum, up to some arbitrary age? There is no magical process whereby air gives individuality to the infant, it was a living being the day before it's birth as it is the day after it's birth.

if you put the burden of protection on the woman alone when she is having sex, the decision should be hers alone. typical male response to place blame on a single person, then want to take away all their rights.

The woman does have the burden placed on her, she is the one who has the most responsibility, she cannot deny this. She has to be aware of her actions, since her consequences are greater than the male's. If you are the driver of a car, are you or your passenger responsible for any injuries you inflict on others?

are you telling me every time in life you have had sex you have given thought to protection, not just against pregnancy but against disease as well?

If you drink and drive are you not responsible for your actions? Even if you did not consider the consequences.

to make abortions illegal will not stop them from going on.

Laws against actions have never made these actions disappear, it simply defines the rules of society and protection of individual rights and defines the punishments for infringing on these rights.

to try to explain how a woman feels when faced with an unexpected pregnancy to a man is simply not possible. i'm not flaming anyone here, i'm merely stating my view of the matter, just like all you guys here. the only exception is, i've been there, as a woman, and you never will be there.

Emotion is not a valid argument. Whites did not "feel" that blacks were equal, and therefore disregarded their civil liberties, allowing for the sale, purchase and execution of human beings.

Women need to wake up and take responsibility of their actions. They have the onus placed on them by nature, which one cannot deny. With the access of birth control, there should be very few abortions performed today, but we see a total disregard for personal responsibility and a purely animalistic concept of sexual nature.
 
BabyDoc is correct.

Partial Birth Abortion is NOT the same as a abortion.
I would suggest a few people here learn about the differences.


To even compare partial birth abortion to abortion as a form of birth control is ridiculous. Again they are totally different procedures.

Even if the ban on partial birth abortion were to pass abortion would still remain and people will still continue to have sex - complete with an accident here and there.

To the religious folk and accident would be an act of God.

To each his own belief.
 
Man this is a tough one. Since I don't know what partial "whatever the term is" abortions are, I can't give an educated opinion. I've always struggled with this issue. When is a fetus considered a living being? A human infant cannot protect itself, so someone else has to. On one hand, I look at the world around me and see how shitty it actually is and think that the world doesn't need unwanted children when there are plenty of starving ones now. On the other hand, I can't get past what I think is actually killing a human being once it reaches a certain point in the womb, just because someone doesn't want him or her.
 
Top Bottom