Old days of AAS

[instant.muscle]

soooo true, and Deca-Durabolin - nandrolone decanoate - is a great compound to cut with... i promise you that it is all about the diet, period....

deca is the most calorie dependent steroid there is, how u c it being a good cutting agent? hope i dont sound like an ass i really am curious if so i'd love to try it

 

[slimsc]

Deca-Durabolin - nandrolone decanoate - is the most calorie dependent steroid there is, how u c it being a good cutting agent? hope i dont sound like an ass i really am curious if so i'd love to try it

i works wonders for me... it keeps my strength up while i am leaning up... it also allows me to stay nice and full until what ever predetermined date i need to shed the water...

remember, i never said it would be good for putting on some muscle while in a carlorie deficit... if that is the case there is only one compound made that i know that does that and it is the golden one, primo...

hands down my favorite!!!

 

[mattdan]

It's funny for me to see a post like this since I have to smirk a bit when I view threads on "cutting cycles." Which is best? How's this one? how's that one? Should I run such and such another 6 weeks? It's a joke. Steroids are GROWTH drugs and that's how the old timers used them.

All steroids will burn fat to a degree, mostly by in creasing metabolism and lean mass. They are ALL the same, it's just that some retain water and others do not. So to answer your question -- they trained harder and ate less. Cutting comes from diet and exercise not which stack you use.

Great post - exactly true. I wanted to post something similar when I saw it, but didn't (wouldn't have been as good anyway)

we didn't have the internet to buy the stuff so you got what was local, and it was usually very limited. d bol, a drol, test and deca was about it. If you knew a vet (we did) you could get EQ. Came in a huge fucking bottle which made sense since it was for a horse.

 

[Nelson Montana]

Generally I agree with your statement. However...

Dianabol and anadrol are in a different category called class II anabolic steroids. They have poor binding affinity for the androgen receptors, yet cause probably more in term of mass gain than any other gear.

In addition to the water and muscle gains these two steroids provide, they also increase the amount of intermuscular fat more than class I steroids like (most of) the rest.

Testosterone seems to exhibit gains from both mechanisms.

Both steroids also increase blood volume considerably. But I believe you can "cut" even on these, if done right.

 

[instant.muscle]

cool good info guys thanks

 

[DJ_UFO]

It's funny for me to see a post like this since I have to smirk a bit when I view threads on "cutting cycles." Which is best? How's this one? how's that one? Should I run such and such another 6 weeks? It's a joke. Steroids are GROWTH drugs and that's how the old timers used them.

All steroids will burn fat to a degree, mostly by in creasing metabolism and lean mass. They are ALL the same, it's just that some retain water and others do not. So to answer your question -- they trained harder and ate less. Cutting comes from diet and exercise not which stack you use.

True. I also believe that there is no such thing as "cutting" cycle or "bulking" cycle. You cut or you bulk but is not drug dependant. It is diet, excercise dependant. It is true that some drugs have different effects in water retention, metabolism, calorie sensibility, but at the end they are one thing. Anabolic Androgenic Steroids.

 

[instant.muscle]

well tren is a better cutter than anadrol

 

[instant.muscle]

did they have NPP back in the day?

 

[Nelson Montana]

did they have NPP - Nandrolone PhenylPropionate - back in the day?

I believe that popped up around 1980 or so.

 

[holy ghost]

I like
TREN A EOD
TEST P EOD
MAST P EOD
WINNY