Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply US-PHARMACIES UGL OZ
Raptor Labs UGFREAK OxygenPharm
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplyUS-PHARMACIES UGL OZUGFREAKRaptor LabsOxygenPharm

Nudity in Avatars....

  • Thread starter Thread starter The Shadow
  • Start date Start date
T

The Shadow

Guest
...there has been a dramatic increase in the number of avatars which display nudity. Compounding the problem is the fact that avater size has been increased.

For those who have av's that display said nudity, please remove them to something more appropiate for the Chat Forum.

There is an option to turn the av's off........but this does not help browsing guests who might be turned off by such displaysm and thus not support the site.

Thanks.
 
Damn. This is because of the whole Janet Jackson thing isn't?

I guess that means I can't put that old Av up of mine...
 
lamamacita said:
What about this? ha.


Yea, seriously.....are thong avatars acceptable because I plan to go back to my girl's booty avatar (and Daisy_Girl) in the future. I wouldn't show anything but the booty.
 
The Shadow said:
...there has been a dramatic increase in the number of avatars which display nudity. Compounding the problem is the fact that avater size has been increased.

For those who have av's that display said nudity, please remove them to something more appropiate for the Chat Forum.

There is an option to turn the av's off........but this does not help browsing guests who might be turned off by such displaysm and thus not support the site.

Thanks.


Define nudity.....woman's boobs, woman's boobs with nipple covered, vagina, ass, ass with thong, back, arms, legs..anything not covered. Nudity is a broad word...or how about a man's chest, abs, back, penis, chest with covered nipples, ass, legs...anything not covered.

Probably the easiest thing would be to post a little sign when anyone comes into EF that there may be pics of a graphic nature..viewer warning...

And keep in mind people could be turned off by many other things besides nudity....What may offend one person--does not offend another--you either have to be a PC site or a non PC site....

Should we also start to watching the language in the chat forum as we would not want to offend anyone....

You need to create well thought out, specific rules for all users (paying plat and non paying members), not ones that change from day to day or mod to mod. Until then, I will do my best to comply with the vague, generic EF standards....... :coffee:
 
avenirup said:
Define nudity.....woman's boobs, woman's boobs with nipple covered, vagina, ass, ass with thong, back, arms, legs..anything not covered. Nudity is a broad word...or how about a man's chest, abs, back, penis, chest with covered nipples, ass, legs...anything not covered.

Probably the easiest thing would be to post a little sign when anyone comes into EF that there may be pics of a graphic nature..viewer warning...

And keep in mind people could be turned off by many other things besides nudity....What may offend one person--does not offend another--you either have to be a PC site or a non PC site....

Should we also start to watching the language in the chat forum as we would not want to offend anyone....

You need to create well thought out, specific rules for all users (paying plat and non paying members), not ones that change from day to day or mod to mod. Until then, I will do my best to comply with the vague, generic EF standards....... :coffee:

Well said! And i for one am for nudity as long as theres no penetration or insides showing.
 
avenirup said:
Define nudity.....woman's boobs, woman's boobs with nipple covered, vagina, ass, ass with thong, back, arms, legs..anything not covered. Nudity is a broad word...or how about a man's chest, abs, back, penis, chest with covered nipples, ass, legs...anything not covered.

Probably the easiest thing would be to post a little sign when anyone comes into EF that there may be pics of a graphic nature..viewer warning...

And keep in mind people could be turned off by many other things besides nudity....What may offend one person--does not offend another--you either have to be a PC site or a non PC site....

Should we also start to watching the language in the chat forum as we would not want to offend anyone....

You need to create well thought out, specific rules for all users (paying plat and non paying members), not ones that change from day to day or mod to mod. Until then, I will do my best to comply with the vague, generic EF standards....... :coffee:

ok, lets say anything you would want your 8 year old son to see is ok, ie. no nipples, pussy or assholes or men's peni

many people browse at work or a family home so they need consideration about what can be seen over their shoulders

also people should not feel inclined to turn off avatars due to some risque ones

as digger once said, let's just be adults about this and used common sense
 
T-Bone said:
ok, lets say anything you would want your 8 year old son to see is ok, ie. no nipples, pussy or assholes or men's peni

many people browse at work or a family home so they need consideration about what can be seen over their shoulders

also people should not feel inclined to turn off avatars due to some risque ones

as digger once said, let's just be adults about this and used common sense

Your 8 year old son probably should not be on a website, whos major focus is anabolic steroids....I would not allow my 8 old son to go on a site such as this..

If you browse at work or a family home, then you should know that this site may contain pics AND language of a graphic nature and maybe you should not go on when the family or your boss is looking over your shoulder. Just being on this site at most places of work (nudity or not) can get you in some trouble.

Do you think some of the language or a shitty finger should be on this site?? I mean what if I am at work and my boss sees the word "fuck" on the screen...do you think his or her reaction will be any different than a chicks ass or tit?? I doubt it. If we censor the nudity (mostly partial), where does the censorship end?? Should handles be changed so they do not possibly offend someone or topics of a mildly sexual nature be banned? Or should you just continue to make up new rules as we go along depending on how a mod feels that day. People who are offended by anything on this site (nudity, language, roids, etc, etc) are probably not the members you want or the members who will buy G. Spellwin's "How to get Laid" or "Secrets of Buying Steroids" books....Do you get my point.

What is common sense to you is not common sense to everyone else. What you consider offensive, others do not. Some people may let there 8 year old son look at something you may consider inappropraite. So, since George Spellwin owns the site, he should create well thought out, specific rules that everyone must comply with. Some mods do not have a problem with certain types of nudity-others do. You are a mod, you are supposed to monitor the boards by rules G. Spellwin has created for his website. The only problem is that they are not available (if there are any) or hidden from the members. Kinda makes it hard to follow when they change from day to day or mod to mod.

So when a mod PM's you about the inappropraite avatar you have had for three weeks--it kinda is frustrating because there is nothing that specifically states what is allowed and what isn't and the fact that several other mods were ok with the avatar makes it even more confusing. If one mod posts a rule, does that mean all mods now have to follow it?? G. Spellwin should be posting updated rules--not mods. :coffee:
 
T-Bone said:
ok, lets say anything you would want your 8 year old son to see is ok, ie. no nipples, pussy or assholes or men's peni

many people browse at work or a family home so they need consideration about what can be seen over their shoulders

also people should not feel inclined to turn off avatars due to some risque ones

as digger once said, let's just be adults about this and used common sense


I wouldn't want my 8-yr old son to see a poop finger avatar either. :artist:
 
not to be an asshole, BUT, there are times when I am parousing (sp?) the site at work innocently on the main page and I realize that the word "BUTTS" is at the top of the page in huge letters right next to a woman's ass in a thong. not tryin to start shit, just putting in my 2 cents. I like the nudie avatars, but if it isn't acceptable by management's standards then that's the way it is.
 
KillahBee said:
not to be an asshole, BUT, there are times when I am parousing (sp?) the site at work innocently on the main page and I realize that the word "BUTTS" is at the top of the page in huge letters right next to a woman's ass in a thong. not tryin to start shit, just putting in my 2 cents. I like the nudie avatars, but if it isn't acceptable by management's standards then that's the way it is.


You are totally correct about the main page...from the get go you have the butts pic or an ad for "the art of seduction" book (close on the title) which features two chicks in Bikinis over one another....And by the way, the avatar you have Killah may be consider offensive. I mean a guy who is basically wearing a tiny speedo may not be appropriate for someone's 8 year old son.... :rolleyes:
 
I always turn avatars and images off at work, not just because of the nudity but it also makes surfing much faster.
 
Since I'm sure I'll be one of the first that is affected by this, I'm going to chime in and say that I completely agree with avenirup.

There are multiple sections devoted to nudity and sex, and a huge focus of this site is about the use of illegal drugs. This is hardly someplace to surf when you're at work nor is it wholesome family entertainment. An 8 year old should be nowhere near the content on this site.

Ultimately, this is George's site, and he should make the decisions. He lays down the law, and we can choose to abide by it or go back from whence we came. But don't try to arbitrarily make something "offensive". I have been offended by much more on this site than the woman's ass in my avatar.
 
i'm gonna say something here that's probably going to piss some people off, but oh well. if you're at work, shouldn't you be WORKING and not surfing the net? if your boss comes walking in and sees an avatar that is R rated, i mean come on, what should you be more worried about - the fact that you're fucking off at work and just got caught or the images on your computer? granted, there are probably some people that have jobs where surfing the net is legit, but for the people that are just fucking off at work, maybe you should be more worried about working and not surfing.

about the content of the forums - didn't GS say himself that he was not going to have people censoring what gets posted on this site? granted, i've heard that mentioning certain other sites will be automatically censored, but wasn't there an issue with a mod censoring posts or deleting threads jsut because they did not agree with them and GS said he was not going to allow that to happen?

also - maybe on the page where all the forums are listed with a brief description of each there should be a "warning" saying that the content of the forum may not be work safe or whatever. i know the pictures of women forum has no such warning, and the first time i went in there i was greeted with full frontal nudity while my 2 children were walking through the room. a warning about the contents of the forum on the forums listing page would've been nice so i would've known to save that one for after the kids went to bed.

good points about the flashing banners and some of the content of this site being anabolic steroids, guide to getting laid, and what not. if now there's a stink being made about avatars, then why aren't you complaining about these other things as well? i do feel that yes, everyone should use some common sense in their avatars and post avatars up that are no more than you can see on regular TV. being worried about the content of people's avatars while you are surfing this site at work says that you probably don't have your priorities straight. there's a lot of other things on this site that you should be worried about an employer catching you looking at than just an avatar.

i mainly surf EF at home. there are 2 children in this house - my 6 yr old "step-daughter" (she would be anyway if me and her mother were married) and my 3 yr old son. i really have no problem with one of them walking through the room while there's a thong avatar or a bikini avatar. that's something that they can basically see on TV. but i don't look at porn while they are awake, so i do know that I, for one, do appreciate when people use a friendly avatar (although Mr. Black's apple avatar was AWESOME! :D )

digger put it right - we all know that Tab A goes into Slot B. use some common sense. i havn't seen an avatar in a few days that looks a little too "revealing," so why are we making a big deal out of this now?
 
avenirup said:
Define nudity.....woman's boobs, woman's boobs with nipple covered, vagina, ass, ass with thong, back, arms, legs..anything not covered. Nudity is a broad word...or how about a man's chest, abs, back, penis, chest with covered nipples, ass, legs...anything not covered.

Probably the easiest thing would be to post a little sign when anyone comes into EF that there may be pics of a graphic nature..viewer warning...

And keep in mind people could be turned off by many other things besides nudity....What may offend one person--does not offend another--you either have to be a PC site or a non PC site....

Should we also start to watching the language in the chat forum as we would not want to offend anyone....

You need to create well thought out, specific rules for all users (paying plat and non paying members), not ones that change from day to day or mod to mod. Until then, I will do my best to comply with the vague, generic EF standards....... :coffee:



I think you know the difference!

With the avatar you have now and then the one with the female body part with teeth!
 
Some of us have the ability to multitask at work which is how we browse this site. I'm so used to the way I take calls that i can be browsing this website while efficiently talking to a customer and typing what they say in another screen while reading. I also read the forums while on break and lunch. I to have noticed the increase in nudity in the avatars and i was even gonna posta thread yesterday b/c they were getting out of hand. The sys admins at my work are very loose when it comes to restrictions on what we can view and I would rather that not be taken away b/c someone sees a nude chick on my screen.
 
T-Bone said:
fair enough, have it your own way, I'll let digger deal with the avatars

digger did deal with this. he did have a sticky about this. the amount of nude avatars seemed to decrease after that. Digger's sticky was just up a few days ago wasn't it?

Bonkme2 said:
There are multiple sections devoted to nudity and sex, and a huge focus of this site is about the use of illegal drugs. This is hardly someplace to surf when you're at work nor is it wholesome family entertainment.

agree.

and like i said once, there's no "warnings" on the forums as to the content of them. i have no problem with nudity, however, when i first visited the pictures of women forum and was greeted with full frontal nudity, my children were here. no warning on the forum whatsoever. i wouldn't of even entered it if there had been a warning on it (well, at least not until they went to bed ;) ). the chat forum, pictures of women, pictures of men, and possibly the pictures of our members forums need these "warnings" so a new member or a guest knows exactly what they're getting into.

The Shadow said:
.

There is an option to turn the av's off........but this does not help browsing guests who might be turned off by such displaysm and thus not support the site.

Thanks.

honestly, i don't know if supporting the site is an issue or not. isn't this site in the 70s out of the top 100 forums on the net? honestly, that says a LOT about EF. it says that the members enjoy the content of the site. it shows that the site has a lot of support. when you've got a site that gets that much traffic, do you think that you're doing something wrong?
 
KillahBee said:
not to be an asshole, BUT, there are times when I am parousing (sp?) the site at work innocently on the main page and I realize that the word "BUTTS" is at the top of the page in huge letters right next to a woman's ass in a thong. not tryin to start shit, just putting in my 2 cents. I like the nudie avatars, but if it isn't acceptable by management's standards then that's the way it is.

Thanks God ...I dont have to put up with your crackass avatar...
 
Last edited:
Pamela said:
I think you know the difference!

With the avatar you have now and then the one with the female body part with teeth!


Pamela I wasn't referring to that avatar. I contacted you about that-you didn't contact me. I asked you if that was ok...you said "some people may have a problem, please change it as soon as possible." How long was it on the boards--1 hour?? The avatar I changed it with was of a female breast...which many mods have posted to and seen (will not mention any names)....one mod didn't think it was appropriate to have a pic of a woman's breast (with slightly covered nipple mind you)...others did. That is where the problem is.

Mods post "inappropriate" avatars too--way more "inappropriate” than the woman's breast pic (in my opinion)--shouldn't they be the ones making the examples?? If I am not mistaken you once had an avatar what looked like to be a half naked woman with glasses on...appropriate or not?? How much skin is appropriate?? Would I let my 8 year old son see chicks in thongs or see thru bras?? Probably not….But that is just what I would do—you could be different. And I could but will not could give you many examples of mods who have posted inappropriate pics (nudity or not)--all I am asking for is a detailed list of rules so no admin, mod or member gets confused. Don’t you think it would be easier that way?? Again, just show me a list of rules and regs so the confusion can stop and everything will be fine-it really isn’t that big of a deal. Right now everything changes day to day, mod to mod. When someone comes along and makes a statement to "use your best judgment" that isn't to specific...and again what offends you may not offend me...that is where the problem lies when there is no rule book.
 
Delinquent said:
Some of us have the ability to multitask at work which is how we browse this site. I'm so used to the way I take calls that i can be browsing this website while efficiently talking to a customer and typing what they say in another screen while reading. I also read the forums while on break and lunch. I to have noticed the increase in nudity in the avatars and i was even gonna posta thread yesterday b/c they were getting out of hand. The sys admins at my work are very loose when it comes to restrictions on what we can view and I would rather that not be taken away b/c someone sees a nude chick on my screen.


Is your boss cool with chicks in panties and bra or bikini or guys in thongs/speedos??
 
avenirup said:
Is your boss cool with chicks in panties and bra or bikini or guys in thongs/speedos??


If my boss walked by and saw pics of women in bra and panties, she would definitely start to question what kind of site I was on. But if that's gonna be allowed especially at the size the avatars can be, I'll have to turn them off.
 
avenirup said:
Your 8 year old son probably should not be on a website, whos major focus is anabolic steroids....I would not allow my 8 old son to go on a site such as this..

If you browse at work or a family home, then you should know that this site may contain pics AND language of a graphic nature and maybe you should not go on when the family or your boss is looking over your shoulder. Just being on this site at most places of work (nudity or not) can get you in some trouble.

Do you think some of the language or a shitty finger should be on this site?? I mean what if I am at work and my boss sees the word "fuck" on the screen...do you think his or her reaction will be any different than a chicks ass or tit?? I doubt it. If we censor the nudity (mostly partial), where does the censorship end?? Should handles be changed so they do not possibly offend someone or topics of a mildly sexual nature be banned? Or should you just continue to make up new rules as we go along depending on how a mod feels that day. People who are offended by anything on this site (nudity, language, roids, etc, etc) are probably not the members you want or the members who will buy G. Spellwin's "How to get Laid" or "Secrets of Buying Steroids" books....Do you get my point.

What is common sense to you is not common sense to everyone else. What you consider offensive, others do not. Some people may let there 8 year old son look at something you may consider inappropraite. So, since George Spellwin owns the site, he should create well thought out, specific rules that everyone must comply with. Some mods do not have a problem with certain types of nudity-others do. You are a mod, you are supposed to monitor the boards by rules G. Spellwin has created for his website. The only problem is that they are not available (if there are any) or hidden from the members. Kinda makes it hard to follow when they change from day to day or mod to mod.

So when a mod PM's you about the inappropraite avatar you have had for three weeks--it kinda is frustrating because there is nothing that specifically states what is allowed and what isn't and the fact that several other mods were ok with the avatar makes it even more confusing. If one mod posts a rule, does that mean all mods now have to follow it?? G. Spellwin should be posting updated rules--not mods. :coffee:

...OWNED... :sulk:
 
WODIN said:
Technically my emu is naked. LOVE MY EMU!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Full emu nudity shots are no no's. :chomp:


LOL! not!

RADAR
 
deklan said:
That Comment is directed at shadow in relation to your post.


Now that I have educated myself via the urban dictionary, I understand....I just found out what the word Juan means...thanks for the link...
 
Since we as a group backed off a bit from the OB-GYN stuff, I haven't been bothered. I'm only making this post because I was asked to speak up. I'm not going to try to attach names to comments here, so when I say "You," it's in the sense of "you know who you are."

OUT: Exposed genitalia or excretory orifices, penetration, or ejection of material.
IN: Anything you'd wear (or see) at a competition or on a public beach. That means that toplessness should not be a big deal, but let's see a pic that didn't require a macro lens to focus from six inches away, m'kay?

An avatar's supposed to say something unique about you. What does yours say? If it says "I like naked chicks," well, DUH!

You're right, this isn't a site for eight year olds. But as noted in that sticky, we're not carding people at the door either, and don't want to start.

Some images that would be perfectly fine in Between the Sheets don't work that well in Chat -- and Chat isn't Scatology. (Someone joked about creating a Scat forum. It didn't go over with the owner. I didn't say a word; I didn't have to.) Your av goes everywhere you go. Yes, that does mean it should be acceptable in the most public, least adult forum we have. (That would be Chat, in case you're taking notes.) (Same thing with sigs, by the way.)

No, I don't want to make a hard rule and then watch people try to "game" it. I'd rather see that creativity going into new and interesting threads. Great line from Garrison Keilor: "Comfort makes you stupid." I'm not here to make you comfortable. I'm here to challenge you.

The F-word used to be an automatic "R" in the movies. Using it in a post doesn't strike me as the same as plastering it up in your av in half-inch yellow letters for no damn reason (Hi, FF!). Or having the fickle finger of fate in ASCII art as your sig, for that matter. I like to save my swearing and rude gestures for times when they are particularly appropriate. That's not one of the Ten Commandments; that's an invitation to open up a discussion.

The brown finger av? I had words with Tuc about that. Goes to show you that the mods and admins are not a hive mind; we have differences of opinion too. I hope that we err on the side of "being reasonable," whatever that may mean. "Being reasonable" doesn't mean "anything goes."

There's a difference between "acting like a grownup" and "acting like a 19-year-old who got his hands on his big brother's driver's license."

The guy who pointed out the "Boobs! Butts! Bikinis!" banner ad -- you got us. The boobs and butts ARE wearing bikinis, though.
 
ok, digger said it much better


but regarding the 8 year old thing, I meant perhaps some people have children in the home who might happen to walk past their computer, not someone of such an age on the site
 
T-Bone said:
ok, digger said it much better

Have to. It's in my job description. ;)

By the way -- that emu isn't naked. It's got feathers. (We had to get the cat shaved a few months back. Fur and feathers DO count.)
 
T-Bone said:
ok, digger said it much better

Tuc, no offense sir, but you really are foolish to be in here shaking your shit covered fingers at us to say our avatars need to be better for 8 yr olds. I mean what was on your hand the other day? Wolf Brand Chili? i just think it is funny for you to be in here yapping about avataras after that stunt you pulled with the shit covered Gang Signs last week. LOL

I think Tuc's dirty fingers were almost as disgusting as BonkMe's hail damage avatar. BTW, Bonkme2, you said that is a she in your avavatar, ummm how can you be so sure?

I have not seen any "Pink" avatars or "insides", I like to think my avatars always leave the sensitive areas covered, and show a touch of class, beauty, and sexiness. I have never received anything but compliments on my avataras. :verygood:

One more thing, Lamamacita, please let me know if someone asks you to remove your asssvataro due to graphic nature or some shit. I, for one, think mamacita has a very sexy and classy avatar and people harassing her is totally not cool. She is a Quality Personal Assistant with a bright future, and she is very intelligent. In summation, dont hate the Playas, hate the game. ;)

as you were
 
Sh4dowF4lcon said:
I think Tuc's dirty fingers were almost as disgusting as BonkMe's hail damage avatar. BTW, Bonkme2, you said that is a she in your avavatar, ummm how can you be so sure?

Let the games begin...

Nobody asked you for an opinion on my avatar, you little punk bitch. I told you from the start there was no hard feelings. I tried to ignore the red K. But you need to keep coming. Like you feel more like a man or something.

So since you insist on bringing it to EF, apparently we need to make this public. So hide behind your little keyboard and bring your best shot.

In the end, though, you're still a tool.
 
T-Bone said:
ok, digger said it much better


but regarding the 8 year old thing, I meant perhaps some people have children in the home who might happen to walk past their computer, not someone of such an age on the site

I have 2 children at home. they are 6 and 3. It has not, will not, and will never be EF's responsibility to moniter what my children can see on my computer screen as they walk through the room. it is MY responsibility. and i make sure they don't see things they shouldn't.

it is not EF's responsibility to moniter what is on your computer screen at work. it is YOUR responsibility. if you're not supposed to be surfing the net at work and you happen to get caught because your boss walks by and sees a picture of a naked woman in an avatar and that's what starts the ball rolling, who's fault is it? it's most certainly not EF's fault for what someone was doing on a computer at work on company time.

if EF wants to control what avatar (and other) images are seen on this site, then admin has every right to. If admin says no nude images in avatars, so be it. if they allow nude images in avatars, so be it. but it is YOUR responsibility when it comes to what YOU are doing at home or at work.

The Shadow had a good point when he started this thread. but the "my kids can see it" or the "i don't want my boss to see it" arguements that have been brought up are not EF's responsibility people. take responsibility for your own actions.
 
Bonkme2 said:
you little punk bitch. I told you from the start there was no hard feelings. I tried to ignore the red K. You insist on bringing it to EF, apparently we need to make this public. So hide behind your little keyboard and bring your best shot.In the end, though, you're still a tool.

I am 6'2" 249 lbs, at least call me a BIG punk bitch, not a little punk bitch :rolleyes:

Sh4dowF4lcon said:
BTW, Bonkme2, you said that is a she in your avavatar, ummm how can you be so sure?

Is this what offended you? I am asking how you know it is a SHE? lol

I dont get into public pissing matches with the neighborhood tough guys like yourself. It was a question, it was not meant to offend you or attack you. Here, read it again and tell me which part is offensive to you:

Sh4dowF4lcon said:
BTW, Bonkme2, you said that is a she in your avavatar, ummm how can you be so sure?

As far as the red Karma goes, yes I did! It was for childish outbursts like this more than the avatar. I think most people will tell you, I am a peaceful person. If I offended you, do try and get over it. :rose:


TUC, you seem pretty testy about this whole thing. I mean if you are trying to be funny it is working, because I am lmao! Some people need to grow up? bwahahahaha, okay stinky pinky!! j/k bro :)
 
I vote for female nipples to be OK'd.... it is all about equality.. Why is it ok to have a picture of a guy with a bare chest but a woman's bare chest is deemed unacceptable??

Chest, pecs, boobs and nipple freedom for both genders !!!!
 
Big Rick Rock said:
I vote for female nipples to be OK'd.... it is all about equality.. Why is it ok to have a picture of a guy with a bare chest but a woman's bare chest is deemed unacceptable??

Chest, pecs, boobs and nipple freedom for both genders !!!!

agreed! I think nipples can be tastefully done.
 
crak600 said:
I have 2 children at home. they are 6 and 3. It has not, will not, and will never be EF's responsibility to moniter what my children can see on my computer screen as they walk through the room. it is MY responsibility. and i make sure they don't see things they shouldn't.

it is not EF's responsibility to moniter what is on your computer screen at work. it is YOUR responsibility. if you're not supposed to be surfing the net at work and you happen to get caught because your boss walks by and sees a picture of a naked woman in an avatar and that's what starts the ball rolling, who's fault is it? it's most certainly not EF's fault for what someone was doing on a computer at work on company time.

if EF wants to control what avatar (and other) images are seen on this site, then admin has every right to. If admin says no nude images in avatars, so be it. if they allow nude images in avatars, so be it. but it is YOUR responsibility when it comes to what YOU are doing at home or at work.

The Shadow had a good point when he started this thread. but the "my kids can see it" or the "i don't want my boss to see it" arguements that have been brought up are not EF's responsibility people. take responsibility for your own actions.

Word.
 
digger said:
Have to. It's in my job description. ;)

By the way -- that emu isn't naked. It's got feathers. (We had to get the cat shaved a few months back. Fur and feathers DO count.)

SWEET so I can post up av of my g/f... she as fur... not much, but I like it that way...

Kidding orb, don't blast me red... mmmmkay?
 
lol this reminds me of when i put my ass up as an avatar, in 5 minutes i had 20 threads demanding i changed it...but female asses are ok in avatars...bah, double standards!
 
Just to wrap this up... I don't want to be mommy and I don't want to have mods coming to me to lay down the smack everytime someone gets a little frisky.

Here's how I'd like to leave it -- if a mod asks you to fine-tune something, we appreciate your cooperation and we will take it into account in all our future dealings with you. Next time you want a favor, you want to goof around a little, whatever -- you went along, so we'll get along.

If you give a mod a hard time, though, at that point it stops being about your avatar or your signature. It's more like you're stiffing the waitress at your favorite club and then flipping off the bouncer. You think they're going to forget about that by next Friday night? Uh-uh.
 
LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL Digger You are a RIOT Bro !!!!!

I need to come down to China Town and take the tour.
 
digger said:
Just to wrap this up... I don't want to be mommy and I don't want to have mods coming to me to lay down the smack everytime someone gets a little frisky.

Here's how I'd like to leave it -- if a mod asks you to fine-tune something, we appreciate your cooperation and we will take it into account in all our future dealings with you. Next time you want a favor, you want to goof around a little, whatever -- you went along, so we'll get along.

If you give a mod a hard time, though, at that point it stops being about your avatar or your signature. It's more like you're stiffing the waitress at your favorite club and then flipping off the bouncer. You think they're going to forget about that by next Friday night? Uh-uh.

This is a great change here! I and some of my friends have started coming to this site. Some of them have already left due to the graphic pictures and some have left due to the nasty language. I will try to get them to come back now. Thanks!
 
DVDA said:
This is a great change here! I and some of my friends have started coming to this site. Some of them have already left due to the graphic pictures and some have left due to the nasty language. I will try to get them to come back now. Thanks!


This isn't a change. This is how it has always been. Graphic pics (maybe not in avatars) and "nasty" language are still around my friend...
 
DVDA said:
This is a great change here! I and some of my friends have started coming to this site. Some of them have already left due to the graphic pictures and some have left due to the nasty language. I will try to get them to come back now. Thanks!


Thanks for coming back!

If you see or have a problem please PM me and I will try and take care
of it.. :)


Pamela :Pamela:
 
superqt4u2nv said:
<<<< is this showing to much? :qt:


ABSOLUTLY NOT!!!! Wait, let me take a closer look....

NOPE!!! The BOTH look good to me!! (real good!!! ( . ) ( . )

Tell us? I'm guessing 36D? Fess up or I'll post a poll - I swear I will!!! :chomp:
 
TheRide said:
Tell us? I'm guessing 36D? Fess up or I'll post a poll - I swear I will!!! :chomp:

I'd say 34 D, as the numbers have nothing to do with the size of the breast, rather the size of the woman's back.
 
Isn't that supposed to be clambutteroil?
 
Top Bottom