Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
avenirup
New member
The Shadow said:
Define nudity.....woman's boobs, woman's boobs with nipple covered, vagina, ass, ass with thong, back, arms, legs..anything not covered. Nudity is a broad word...or how about a man's chest, abs, back, penis, chest with covered nipples, ass, legs...anything not covered.
Probably the easiest thing would be to post a little sign when anyone comes into EF that there may be pics of a graphic nature..viewer warning...
And keep in mind people could be turned off by many other things besides nudity....What may offend one person--does not offend another--you either have to be a PC site or a non PC site....
Should we also start to watching the language in the chat forum as we would not want to offend anyone....
You need to create well thought out, specific rules for all users (paying plat and non paying members), not ones that change from day to day or mod to mod. Until then, I will do my best to comply with the vague, generic EF standards.......
avenirup said:Define nudity.....woman's boobs, woman's boobs with nipple covered, vagina, ass, ass with thong, back, arms, legs..anything not covered. Nudity is a broad word...or how about a man's chest, abs, back, penis, chest with covered nipples, ass, legs...anything not covered.
Probably the easiest thing would be to post a little sign when anyone comes into EF that there may be pics of a graphic nature..viewer warning...
And keep in mind people could be turned off by many other things besides nudity....What may offend one person--does not offend another--you either have to be a PC site or a non PC site....
Should we also start to watching the language in the chat forum as we would not want to offend anyone....
You need to create well thought out, specific rules for all users (paying plat and non paying members), not ones that change from day to day or mod to mod. Until then, I will do my best to comply with the vague, generic EF standards.......
Well said! And i for one am for nudity as long as theres no penetration or insides showing.
lamamacita
New member
insides....ugggh!!! hahaha.
psychedout
New member
superqt4u2nv said:<<<< is this showing to much?
This is more than acceptable! Its demandable! BTW, i'm sure you get this alot, but you look great.
tuc biscuit
New member
avenirup said:Define nudity.....woman's boobs, woman's boobs with nipple covered, vagina, ass, ass with thong, back, arms, legs..anything not covered. Nudity is a broad word...or how about a man's chest, abs, back, penis, chest with covered nipples, ass, legs...anything not covered.
Probably the easiest thing would be to post a little sign when anyone comes into EF that there may be pics of a graphic nature..viewer warning...
And keep in mind people could be turned off by many other things besides nudity....What may offend one person--does not offend another--you either have to be a PC site or a non PC site....
Should we also start to watching the language in the chat forum as we would not want to offend anyone....
You need to create well thought out, specific rules for all users (paying plat and non paying members), not ones that change from day to day or mod to mod. Until then, I will do my best to comply with the vague, generic EF standards.......
ok, lets say anything you would want your 8 year old son to see is ok, ie. no nipples, pussy or assholes or men's peni
many people browse at work or a family home so they need consideration about what can be seen over their shoulders
also people should not feel inclined to turn off avatars due to some risque ones
as digger once said, let's just be adults about this and used common sense
avenirup
New member
T-Bone said:
Your 8 year old son probably should not be on a website, whos major focus is anabolic steroids....I would not allow my 8 old son to go on a site such as this..
If you browse at work or a family home, then you should know that this site may contain pics AND language of a graphic nature and maybe you should not go on when the family or your boss is looking over your shoulder. Just being on this site at most places of work (nudity or not) can get you in some trouble.
Do you think some of the language or a shitty finger should be on this site?? I mean what if I am at work and my boss sees the word "fuck" on the screen...do you think his or her reaction will be any different than a chicks ass or tit?? I doubt it. If we censor the nudity (mostly partial), where does the censorship end?? Should handles be changed so they do not possibly offend someone or topics of a mildly sexual nature be banned? Or should you just continue to make up new rules as we go along depending on how a mod feels that day. People who are offended by anything on this site (nudity, language, roids, etc, etc) are probably not the members you want or the members who will buy G. Spellwin's "How to get Laid" or "Secrets of Buying Steroids" books....Do you get my point.
What is common sense to you is not common sense to everyone else. What you consider offensive, others do not. Some people may let there 8 year old son look at something you may consider inappropraite. So, since George Spellwin owns the site, he should create well thought out, specific rules that everyone must comply with. Some mods do not have a problem with certain types of nudity-others do. You are a mod, you are supposed to monitor the boards by rules G. Spellwin has created for his website. The only problem is that they are not available (if there are any) or hidden from the members. Kinda makes it hard to follow when they change from day to day or mod to mod.
So when a mod PM's you about the inappropraite avatar you have had for three weeks--it kinda is frustrating because there is nothing that specifically states what is allowed and what isn't and the fact that several other mods were ok with the avatar makes it even more confusing. If one mod posts a rule, does that mean all mods now have to follow it?? G. Spellwin should be posting updated rules--not mods.
guys. digger is very easily angered. administration of EF will strike you down. beware 
