Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
Less Sex = More Muscle ???
- Thread starter Canadian_Beef_eh
- Start date
abc 1-
Here is what sk was referring to:
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=scienceNews&storyID=3104653
It has been in the news.
Here is what sk was referring to:
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=scienceNews&storyID=3104653
It has been in the news.
thanks for the article.
now i know where such a stupid idea came from.
that study is bullshit. smoke and mirror bullshit. so if i masturbate and have sex more between these ages, they think i am 1/3 less likely to get prostate cancer.
if gene simmons ends up with prostate cancer, which he has pretty much a 1 in 4 chance of getting (with what we are told about the chances of getting prostate cancer), that whole study is done and refutable.
no matter what that article, which is total f'ing garbage, says, that theory will never be proven, ever! unless they do a study of 1,000 men starting at age 20 and keep records of every time they have sex and masturbate for all those years, and then tell us how many of those 1,000 men get prostate cancer after the age of 50. until they put the hypothesis to a real study, it is bullshit. i can't believe someone would actually put there name to such a statement.
it's almost like saying, someone who moves their bowels more often is less likely to get colon cancer, if between these ages (20 - 40) they move their bowels so often, but after this age (50) it doesn't matter. how f'ing stupid.
now i know where such a stupid idea came from.
that study is bullshit. smoke and mirror bullshit. so if i masturbate and have sex more between these ages, they think i am 1/3 less likely to get prostate cancer.
if gene simmons ends up with prostate cancer, which he has pretty much a 1 in 4 chance of getting (with what we are told about the chances of getting prostate cancer), that whole study is done and refutable.
no matter what that article, which is total f'ing garbage, says, that theory will never be proven, ever! unless they do a study of 1,000 men starting at age 20 and keep records of every time they have sex and masturbate for all those years, and then tell us how many of those 1,000 men get prostate cancer after the age of 50. until they put the hypothesis to a real study, it is bullshit. i can't believe someone would actually put there name to such a statement.
it's almost like saying, someone who moves their bowels more often is less likely to get colon cancer, if between these ages (20 - 40) they move their bowels so often, but after this age (50) it doesn't matter. how f'ing stupid.
jasonstrong
New member
abc 1 said:
Sorry but I hit that quote button instead of reply, this post I meant to quote...i'll go back and edit it to read TO ALL...everybody cool down damn......
jasonstrong
New member
To ALL:
I never said not to have sex AT ALL once or twice a day won't hurt..it's when you get into 4,5, and 6 times a day that you start to tear down the recouperative abilities, and that includes choking the chicken.
Here's the link to the article....go on and choke that thing...that will sure combat all the years of heavy roid use and DHT exposure...not????
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=570&ncid=753&e=1&u=/nm/20030716/sc_nm/health_masturbation_dc
Edited by Massive G....
I never said not to have sex AT ALL once or twice a day won't hurt..it's when you get into 4,5, and 6 times a day that you start to tear down the recouperative abilities, and that includes choking the chicken.
Here's the link to the article....go on and choke that thing...that will sure combat all the years of heavy roid use and DHT exposure...not????
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=570&ncid=753&e=1&u=/nm/20030716/sc_nm/health_masturbation_dc
Edited by Massive G....
