Is there anybody, who ran S-4 at 50 mg/day and measured his test levels?

[EliteFitnessGuy]

I would like to have a better idea about the suppression at this dose. At 100 mg/day, it is routinely around 50%. However, so far I haven't found any info regarding suppression at 50 mg/day.

 

[folderslide]

I'm beginning to think this stuff is more suppressive than we think or are led to believe. I cant help but feel my nuts have atrophied at 50mg/day, which ive been running for about 6 weeks now.

I've not done blood tests and have no scientific basis, but let me give an example.

If a compound is suppressive at higher doses such as an anabolic steroid, then even at lower doses it is going to inhibit natty test,only arguably to a lesser extent.

I'm linking s-4 less the more time goes on. as a standalone product it would be great if there were no suppression, but if that is not the case i dont really see a use for it. one could not use it inbetween courses as a means to keep gains coming, because it would inhibit recovery, and for the results noted from the compound, this doesnt seem worthwhile.

if youre going to inhibit your HPTA, you may as well get some good results off it and use traditional gear if you ask me

 

[Nelson Montana]

One of the big advantages of SARMS is the fact that it doesn't enlarge prostate tissue.

It's similar to Proviron in effect, but it's not as harsh. And much like Proviron, it isn't very suppressive -- at low dosages for limited duration.

Take any exogenous source of something the body manufacturers on its own will eventually suppress to some degree.

 

[truckdaddy]

I would like to have a better idea about the suppression at this dose. At 100 mg/day, it is routinely around 50%. However, so far I haven't found any info regarding suppression at 50 mg/day.

Its not suppressive, there are several guys that have had blood-work done that back this up.

I also had a close friend that used one of the saliva test that PP carries and his test was not effected at all on 100mgs ed.

That being said. I would keep the dose at 50mg..... vision issues at 100mg

 

[DJLegacy2k1]

I'm beginning to think this stuff is more suppressive than we think or are led to believe. I cant help but feel my nuts have atrophied at 50mg/day, which ive been running for about 6 weeks now.

I've not done blood tests and have no scientific basis, but let me give an example.

If a compound is suppressive at higher doses such as an anabolic steroid, then even at lower doses it is going to inhibit natty test,only arguably to a lesser extent.

I'm linking s-4 less the more time goes on. as a standalone product it would be great if there were no suppression, but if that is not the case i dont really see a use for it. one could not use it inbetween courses as a means to keep gains coming, because it would inhibit recovery, and for the results noted from the compound, this doesnt seem worthwhile.

if youre going to inhibit your HPTA, you may as well get some good results off it and use traditional gear if you ask me

SARMS shrunk me up nicely too...the only "bloodwork" being pushed on us about recovery and SARMS not suppressing you is on guys that have been running multiple compounds at the same time. I used 2 bottles and first hand after several weeks my libido dropped and my guys shrunk...

 

[RADAR]

Got bloodwork comming this week


RADAR

 

[DJLegacy2k1]

RADAR didnt you already start your dbol cycle?

 

[ChemWiz]

No shrinkage with me, I felt no suppression at 50mgs

 

[Boxingheels]

Very interested in seeing RADARs blood work.

 

[metalfujimi]

I started Sarms today. We'll see how it affects me