Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

IRS Knew Teap Party Was Targeted for Additional Income Tax Scrutiny

As well they should be. You have a political group who's entire raison d'etre is to eliminate tax, I think any filings from them for exempt status should automatically send up red flags.
 
yeah bro we had an election last november.. seems like you are still campaigning as if its gonna make a difference, but to me its the sore loser mentality.. you should be getting ready for 2016 and finding a republican who is capable of winning a state that doesn't have more trailer parks and tornado's than people.
 
Mr. dB said:
As well they should be. You have a political group who's entire raison d'etre is to eliminate tax, I think any filings from them for exempt status should automatically send up red flags.
Click to expand...

Yeah sure, that's exactly what we need to do. Violate people's rights. We could just force republicans to wear stars on their sleeve and stuff then in concentration camps.

No, not "as they should". It's a complete violation. If the tables were turned liberals would be vomiting and spraying diarrhea while screaming bush doing the monkey dance in the street.
 
I love the liberal response to this thread.

If the IRS were targeting Planned Parenthood or Media Matters under a Republican president, they'd be losing their minds.
 
On Jan, 25, 2012, the criteria for flagging suspect groups was changed to, "political action type organizations involved in limiting/expanding Government, educating on the Constitution and Bill of Rights, social economic reform/movement," the report says.
Click to expand...

Yeah, let's have the government target anyone who wants to limit government or educate people about their constitutional rights.

Great plan.
 
Mike4705 said:
Yeah sure, that's exactly what we need to do. Violate people's rights. We could just force republicans to wear stars on their sleeve and stuff then in concentration camps.

No, not "as they should". It's a complete violation. If the tables were turned liberals would be vomiting and spraying diarrhea while screaming bush doing the monkey dance in the street.
Click to expand...

Was anyone unduly denied legit Exempt status, or significantly delayed?
 
Mr. dB said:
Was anyone unduly denied legit Exempt status, or significantly delayed?
Click to expand...

But on June 29, 2011, Lois G. Lerner, who heads the IRS division that oversees tax-exempt organizations, learned at a meeting that groups were being targeted, according to the watchdog's report. At the meeting, she was told that groups with "Tea Party," ''Patriot" or "9/12 Project" in their names were being flagged for additional and often burdensome scrutiny, the report says.
Click to expand...

So they put them through red tape hell and tried to intimidate them.

Great work!
 
mrplunkey said:
I love the liberal response to this thread.

If the IRS were targeting Planned Parenthood or Media Matters under a Republican president, they'd be losing their minds.
Click to expand...

1. It happened and it's fucked up.
2. Nothing I've seen proves BO had anything to do with it.
 
Dial_tone said:
1. It happened and it's fucked up.
2. Nothing I've seen proves BO had anything to do with it.
Click to expand...

BO needs to lop-off a bunch of heads. If he doesn't, then it is on him. If he does, he'll deserve accolades.

The government's tax arm being used as a weapon to quell political dissent is 100% against every liberal and conservative principal. This isn't a (R) or (D) thing, this is just plain tyrannical government.
 
Mr. dB said:
Was anyone unduly denied legit Exempt status, or significantly delayed?
Click to expand...

That is so irrelevant. Just because in your mind this was a victimless CRIME does not change the fact that it is a crime. You can't argue black and white. They put them through the wringer based off of political affiliation (illegal). This is called discrimination. It's not the IRS job to discriminate, it's their job to send me my fucking tax money. But of course liberals don't look at it as discrimination, unless it's a black or Latino that's being discriminated against.
 
Mike4705 said:
That is so irrelevant. Just because in your mind this was a victimless CRIME does not change the fact that it is a crime. You can't argue black and white. They put them through the wringer based off of political affiliation (illegal). This is called discrimination. It's not the IRS job to discriminate, it's their job to send me my fucking tax money. But of course liberals don't look at it as discrimination, unless it's a black or Latino that's being discriminated against.
Click to expand...

It would be like strip searching every single black person you see walking down the street and arresting the ones they find with illegal items.

Would it be acceptable in DB's world since you only arrest people possessing illegal things?
 
mrplunkey said:
BO needs to lop-off a bunch of heads. If he doesn't, then it is on him. If he does, he'll deserve accolades.
Click to expand...
Like all the people Bush sacrificed after everyone realized the evidence of WMD was mostly embellished....just Colin Powell, who was the guy that didn't buy it in the first place.
 
Dial_tone said:
Like all the people Bush sacrificed after everyone realized the evidence of WMD was mostly embellished....just Colin Powell, who was the guy that didn't buy it in the first place.
Click to expand...

That's a reasonable comparison. I'd say using the government's tax collecting arm to quash political dissent is about the same as selectively using and discarding information to lead us into a 10-year trillion-dollar war.

And as far as leaders go, I'd agree with that comparison as well. Barry and Shrub are about equal in terms of presidential quality. I don't particularly care for either.
 
Mr. dB said:
As well they should be. You have a political group who's entire raison d'etre is to eliminate tax, I think any filings from them for exempt status should automatically send up red flags.
Click to expand...

yay...you're advocating profiling! so it's ok to pull over black people cruising through white neighborhoods and it's ok to strip search every swarthy motherfucker trying to board an airplane? i knew that deep down inside you were really one of them!

please...the floor is yours...
 
Things of this nature would be bastardized a decade or two ago. Political party aside people would be asking for their heads. But in today's world this is almost not surprising. Just another regular case of the government overstepping its boundaries as it believes it has none. To take it a step farther half the fucking country doesn't even care. People should demand accountability for this kind of behavior.
The Roman Empire collapsed because of cut throat (literally) politics from WITHIN. This is the path we are headed. No one will destroy America we will destroy ourselves.
 
This will be funny when the future Health and Human Services Secretary Palin decides that every woman who wants a government-sponsored (the only kind) abortion needs to have their DNA sequenced and run through a national crime database as part of the procedure.

This knife is going to cut both ways. Howl now or forever hold your peace.
 
mrplunkey said:
That's a reasonable comparison. I'd say using the government's tax collecting arm to quash political dissent is about the same as selectively using and discarding information to lead us into a 10-year trillion-dollar war.

And as far as leaders go, I'd agree with that comparison as well. Barry and Shrub are about equal in terms of presidential quality. I don't particularly care for either.
Click to expand...

If there is definitive proof that came from BO I would call this up there with Watergate.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
 
Dial_tone said:
If there is definitive proof that came from BO I would call this up there with Watergate.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
Click to expand...

the people that run the department of treasury are allowed to conduct "profiling" type analysis and examinations any time they want...POTUS doesn't have anything to do with it...they issue field directives, audit technique guides, etc. for those industries, etc. that they choose to focus on...a lot of times it's not necessarily because they believe that there is wanton abuse of the treasury regulations, sometimes it's more of a fact gathering and educational exercise...and, if there is a group of people out there that has put themselves out as vehemently opposing the internal revenue code? uh...yeah...they're probably going to get a little closer look...i'm a conservative person and i don't have a problem with it...why should anyone (other than those that are asking for scrutiny) else??
 
stevesmi said:
yeah bro we had an election last november.. seems like you are still campaigning as if its gonna make a difference, but to me its the sore loser mentality.. you should be getting ready for 2016 and finding a republican who is capable of winning a state that doesn't have more trailer parks and tornado's than people.
Click to expand...

Man that response was eat up with stupid. Stick to roid board.,,,!!!!
 
Mike4705 said:
Yeah sure, that's exactly what we need to do. Violate people's rights. We could just force republicans to wear stars on their sleeve and stuff then in concentration camps.

No, not "as they should". It's a complete violation. If the tables were turned liberals would be vomiting and spraying diarrhea while screaming bush doing the monkey dance in the street.
Click to expand...

Agreed. It's funny how "liberals" are anything BUT liberal. Liberal... Liberate, liberation, freedom? Bass ackwards
 
Jack steel said:
Agreed. It's funny how "liberals" are anything BUT liberal. Liberal... Liberate, liberation, freedom? Bass ackwards
Click to expand...
cuz pro-choice isn't freedom. Gay/lesbian rights to marry isn't freedom.
 
Dial_tone said:
cuz pro-choice isn't freedom. Gay/lesbian rights to marry isn't freedom.
Click to expand...

Gay marriage is a good example. I'm conservative but don't care who marries whom. I don't, however, want to subsidize marriage, having children, or mortgages -- straight or gay.

And similarly for abortion, I think it's terrible but sometimes necessary. But once again I have problems with forcing someone else to pay for it -- particularly the controversial kinds such as late-term and partial birth abortions.

If marriage and abortion weren't subsidized, I could appreciate an argument that it isn't anyone elses' business. But once you ask taxpayers to pay for it, it becomes a political issue.
 
Mike4705 said:
Interesting, pro-choice and freedom. Guess the child doesn't have much of a say in it's freedom.
Click to expand...
Are children under 16 free not to go to school?
 
digimon7068 said:
yay...you're advocating profiling! so it's ok to pull over black people cruising through white neighborhoods and it's ok to strip search every swarthy motherfucker trying to board an airplane? i knew that deep down inside you were really one of them!

please...the floor is yours...
Click to expand...

digimon7068 said:
and, if there is a group of people out there that has put themselves out as vehemently opposing the internal revenue code? uh...yeah...they're probably going to get a little closer look...i'm a conservative person and i don't have a problem with it...why should anyone (other than those that are asking for scrutiny) else??
Click to expand...

Are you contradicting yourself here? The second quote is what I was trying to say earlier.
 
Mr. dB said:
Are you contradicting yourself here? The second quote is what I was trying to say earlier.
Click to expand...

You made an interesting argument that singling-out specific groups based on their affiliations or views is justified if it makes collecting taxes more effective.

I like my DNA screening of abortion recipients for similar reasons. I'll bet statistically speaking, someone who needs a 100% state-sponsored abortion would probably have genes similar to someone who has committed a crime (i.e. exact match or at least a relative). Think about how efficient that would be: Some guy could get fingered through the DNA database simply by his sister getting genetically sequenced as part of an abortion. Now THAT would be efficient government.
 
Mr. dB said:
Are you contradicting yourself here? The second quote is what I was trying to say earlier.
Click to expand...

no...not at all...i was actually just agreeing with you...i don't have a problem with "grass-roots law enforcement initiatives" :whatever:

you and i have a lot more in common, theoretically-speaking, than you might expect...or maybe you already know that.

my current office is in close proximity to a couple of bars...i've been pulled over a couple of times during tax season, at 2 am, on my way home from the office...(i'm assuming) because my car was parked behind my office, there is a bar right across the street, and i drove away at closing time...and, i've been "tailed" all the way home on several occassions as well...i don't have a problem with it...if it helps keep the streets safe, who am i to argue? i don't see it as any sort of violation of my privacy or as any sort of violation of any "fair-play" rules.
 
1. Is the IRS discriminating when it focuses more audits on wealthier people with larger deductions? Or is that just efficient use of limited IRS resources?

2. If the FBI spends time survailling mosques that have proclaimed a pro-jihad attitude, is that still racial discrimination, or is that focusing on likely suspects?

3. If a tea bagger group is dedicated to the idea that all federal tax is robbery and immoral, are they deserving of IRS scrutiny or just people who are part of a political party?

Since Plunkey won't understand the meaning behind these questions I'll explain:

1 is an example of an accepted practice where randomness is not the preferred method for candidate selection.
2 and 3 are examples where a group has identified itself as being worthy of scrutiny for good cause, separate from their race or political party etc.

The analogy of a Republican administration scrutinizing planned parenthood or other (so called) liberal groups is not valid if they do not self identify as being in favor of breaking laws (and not paying the federal tax you owe is against the law).

A more reasonable analogy would be FBI spending more time to scrutinizing High Times Magazine, vs Time Magazine. High Times is within its 1st ammendment rights to print whatever it wants, but it could be suspected of breaking laws (all those beautiful pictures of tasty buds couldn't happen without being in posession of those tasty buds).
 
Headholio said:
1. Is the IRS discriminating when it focuses more audits on wealthier people with larger deductions? Or is that just efficient use of limited IRS resources?

2. If the FBI spends time survailling mosques that have proclaimed a pro-jihad attitude, is that still racial discrimination, or is that focusing on likely suspects?

3. If a tea bagger group is dedicated to the idea that all federal tax is robbery and immoral, are they deserving of IRS scrutiny or just people who are part of a political party?

Since Plunkey won't understand the meaning behind these questions I'll explain:

1 is an example of an accepted practice where randomness is not the preferred method for candidate selection.
2 and 3 are examples where a group has identified itself as being worthy of scrutiny for good cause, separate from their race or political party etc.

The analogy of a Republican administration scrutinizing planned parenthood or other (so called) liberal groups is not valid if they do not self identify as being in favor of breaking laws (and not paying the federal tax you owe is against the law).

A more reasonable analogy would be FBI spending more time to scrutinizing High Times Magazine, vs Time Magazine. High Times is within its 1st ammendment rights to print whatever it wants, but it could be suspected of breaking laws (all those beautiful pictures of tasty buds couldn't happen without being in posession of those tasty buds).
Click to expand...

you are making arguments for something the IRS and the President are admitting was wrong.
 
billfred said:
you are making arguments for something the IRS and the President are admitting was wrong.
Click to expand...

Well, we should mark this down as a time that Headholio disagrees with Obama. :)

But the story needs more context. According to the article:

On Jan, 25, 2012, the criteria for flagging suspect groups was changed to, "political action type organizations involved in limiting/expanding Government, educating on the Constitution and Bill of Rights, social economic reform/movement," the report says.
Click to expand...

So its not just the Tea Party that was targeted. Educating on the Constitution would lead to IRS scrutiny? I would say they need more justification than that.

But.....

Even more context:

A 501-C4 tax exempt organization can participate in politics, but must have "Social Welfare" as their primary activity.

So you might have thought that Carl Rove's Crossroads group is a right wing political group, but no, its a social welfare group!

So, the IRS needs to scrutinize these groups that are claiming 501-C4 tax exempt status to make sure they are truly Social Welfare groups and not just political groups which should be paying taxes.

So words like "Tea Party" would flag a group as being political and worthy of scrutiny as to their tax exempt status, or so says the IRS.

Doesn't seem like earth shattering news.
 
Headholio said:
Well, we should mark this down as a time that Headholio disagrees with Obama. :)

But the story needs more context. According to the article:



So its not just the Tea Party that was targeted. Educating on the Constitution would lead to IRS scrutiny? I would say they need more justification than that.

But.....

Even more context:

A 501-C4 tax exempt organization can participate in politics, but must have "Social Welfare" as their primary activity.

So you might have thought that Carl Rove's Crossroads group is a right wing political group, but no, its a social welfare group!

So, the IRS needs to scrutinize these groups that are claiming 501-C4 tax exempt status to make sure they are truly Social Welfare groups and not just political groups which should be paying taxes.

So words like "Tea Party" would flag a group as being political and worthy of scrutiny as to their tax exempt status, or so says the IRS.

Doesn't seem like earth shattering news.
Click to expand...

the point is not targeting that type of organization. It is targeting the one that is affiliated with just one party. Come on man - you are sharper than this.
 
billfred said:
the point is not targeting that type of organization. It is targeting the one that is affiliated with just one party. Come on man - you are sharper than this.
Click to expand...

I get what the accusation is, but the article isn't really clear that that is the case, and the Inspector General's final report on the investigation isn't out.

In all, about 300 groups were singled out for additional review, Lerner said. Of those, about a quarter were singled out because they had "tea party" or "patriot" somewhere in their applications
Click to expand...
.


Who were the other 75% of groups that were targeted? Were they just right wing groups? Or were the political keywords unbiased and used to fairly scrutinize political groups that want tax exempt status?
 
Headholio said:
Well, we should mark this down as a time that Headholio disagrees with Obama. :)

But the story needs more context. According to the article:



So its not just the Tea Party that was targeted. Educating on the Constitution would lead to IRS scrutiny? I would say they need more justification than that.

But.....

Even more context:

A 501-C4 tax exempt organization can participate in politics, but must have "Social Welfare" as their primary activity.

So you might have thought that Carl Rove's Crossroads group is a right wing political group, but no, its a social welfare group!

So, the IRS needs to scrutinize these groups that are claiming 501-C4 tax exempt status to make sure they are truly Social Welfare groups and not just political groups which should be paying taxes.

So words like "Tea Party" would flag a group as being political and worthy of scrutiny as to their tax exempt status, or so says the IRS.

Doesn't seem like earth shattering news.
Click to expand...

political groups don't have to pay taxes...they are exempt under IRC 527...jus' sayin' :nerd:
 
mrplunkey said:
BO needs to lop-off a bunch of heads. If he doesn't, then it is on him. If he does, he'll deserve accolades.

The government's tax arm being used as a weapon to quell political dissent is 100% against every liberal and conservative principal. This isn't a (R) or (D) thing, this is just plain tyrannical government.
Click to expand...

couple years ago it was Hollywood people getting hit up by the IRS and all the libs screamed that they were getting targeted cause they gave heaps of money to the dems. Same old shit now just from the other side so STFU and move on.
 
redsamurai said:
And yet you for 8 years you tongued his ass with no syrup nor jelly....none whatsoever.
Click to expand...

Damn... right back the the homosexual hyperbole.

That didn't take long.

P.S. That's not funny gay. That's just plain creepy gay.
 
digimon7068 said:
political groups don't have to pay taxes...they are exempt under IRC 527...jus' sayin' :nerd:
Click to expand...

You are the expert, but I should have simply stated that organizations that apply for 501 c 4 status need to be scrutinized to ensure they meet the criteria.

I tried to read about IRC 527 and 501 c but man oh man that crap is boring!
 
If NAMBLA applied for a license to run a day care center, would that raise any red flags?
 
Mr. dB said:
If NAMBLA applied for a license to run a day care center, would that raise any red flags?
Click to expand...

They wouldnt be applying to the IRS for tax exemption since they are a for profit business. That is a business license to operate a day care, which would be local or state licenses. Unless you meant a non-profit day care, which Ive never heard of. Either way they would need to be a licensed day care center which goes through the state and local level. And that group promotes something illegal on its surface and has but one singular goal (promotion of sex between grown men and minor children, illegal anyway you slice it everywhere). Whereas most political orgs promote working within the law to achieve their goals. Unless youre talking about groups like KKK or Anarchist organizations, which are already flagged and should be for obvious reason. Flagging something with the word "Patriotic" is unreasonable and the IRS knows it. Comparing NAMBLA to the tea party is a pretty low shot by the way. Congrats.
 
Mr. dB said:
My apologies to NAMBLA then.
Click to expand...

I have not doubt that's how someone collecting taxes for the government while suckling uncle sam's teat would feel about any organization that wanted to limit the size and scope of government.
 
mrplunkey said:
I have not doubt that's how someone collecting taxes for the government while suckling uncle sam's teat would feel about any organization that wanted to limit the size and scope of government.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't know, since I don't do either.
 
Mr. dB said:
I wouldn't know, since I don't do either.
Click to expand...

I have no doubt that in your world, property assessments have nothing to do with taxes.

And I'm sure you don't see being on a government benefits plan as suckling on the government teat either.

:rolleyes:
 
Headholio said:
You are the expert, but I should have simply stated that organizations that apply for 501 c 4 status need to be scrutinized to ensure they meet the criteria.

I tried to read about IRC 527 and 501 c but man oh man that crap is boring!
Click to expand...

remember that the next time you're having trouble sleeping :)
 
mrplunkey said:
I have no doubt that in your world, property assessments have nothing to do with taxes.

And I'm sure you don't see being on a government benefits plan as suckling on the government teat either.

:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

You said suckling on Uncle Sam's teat. That's the federal government. I'm not on any federal benefits. I have insurance and a retirement fund provided by my employer, not the fed. And these are the normal benefits of full time employment, not some sort of entitlement or charity, so I don't see how it's suckling from anyone's teat. I have to work for it.

Of course assessments have something to do with taxes. You said I was a tax collector, but the Assessor does not do any collection, that the Collector's Office's job. We just appraise the property.
 
Mr. dB said:
You said suckling on Uncle Sam's teat. That's the federal government. I'm not on any federal benefits. I have insurance and a retirement fund provided by my employer, not the fed. And these are the normal benefits of full time employment, not some sort of entitlement or charity, so I don't see how it's suckling from anyone's teat. I have to work for it.
Click to expand...

Fair point.

You suckle on the state taxpayer's teat as a state worker.
 
The IRS has been used by FDR and Nixon to target political enemies.

Bureaucrats don't target specific political groups without guidance, their nature is to fuck with everyone based on enforcing Byzantine rules unless they get an administrative memo.
 
javaguru said:
The IRS has been used by FDR and Nixon to target political enemies.

Bureaucrats don't target specific political groups without guidance, their nature is to fuck with everyone based on enforcing Byzantine rules unless they get an administrative memo.
Click to expand...



Citation?
 
mrplunkey said:
Unfortunately, they do.

Yet another way to steal from us.
Click to expand...

The STATE?

Usually that's administered by a somewhat smaller jurisdiction.

Property Taxes

Property taxes are assessed and collected by the local governments. County assessors of property appraise real estate for assessment purposes. In addition, they assess tangible personal property used or held for use in a business. The county commission and city governing bodies determine local property tax rates. The property taxes are collected by county trustees and city collecting officials.

Tennessee does not have a homestead exemption. However, there is a property tax relief program for the elderly, disabled and veterans.
Click to expand...
 
Mr. dB said:
The STATE?

Usually that's administered by a somewhat smaller jurisdiction.
Click to expand...

Property and Inheritance Tax in Tennessee

The great State of Tennessee imposes the following taxes:
There is a 55 per cent Public Utility Property Tax
There is a 40 per cent Commercial and Industrial Property Tax
There is a 30 per cent Business Personal Property Tax
There is a 25 per cent Residential Property Tax
There is a 25 per cent Farm Property Tax

And more at the local level. We should do away with both.
 
Headholio said:
I get what the accusation is, but the article isn't really clear that that is the case, and the Inspector General's final report on the investigation isn't out.

.


Who were the other 75% of groups that were targeted? Were they just right wing groups? Or were the political keywords unbiased and used to fairly scrutinize political groups that want tax exempt status?
Click to expand...

So now that the head of the IRS has resigned, what do you think?
 
“Americans have a right to be angry about it, and I’m angry about it,” -- Barack Obama, May 15 2013

Maybe if he signed a sworn affidavit, the libtards might admit they screwed this up.
 
mrplunkey said:
Property and Inheritance Tax in Tennessee

The great State of Tennessee imposes the following taxes:
There is a 55 per cent Public Utility Property Tax
There is a 40 per cent Commercial and Industrial Property Tax
There is a 30 per cent Business Personal Property Tax
There is a 25 per cent Residential Property Tax
There is a 25 per cent Farm Property Tax

And more at the local level. We should do away with both.
Click to expand...

55, 40, 30, 25, and 25 per cent based on what assessment level?

In most states, property tax is assessed by the county, and is an ad valorem tax expressed in mills, and based on a fractional assessment level as well.
 
Mr. dB said:
55, 40, 30, 25, and 25 per cent based on what assessment level?

In most states, property tax is assessed by the county, and is an ad valorem tax expressed in mills, and based on a fractional assessment level as well.
Click to expand...

$100 I believe.

I'd have to find the page again. It's far too high.
 
-SD- said:
But then who would investigate the AP phone number snatchers?
Click to expand...

They should do that investigation too!

He can blame the sequester as the reason that he can't afford more people to straighten-out his corrupt, Chicago-style administration.
 
So a tidbit of info comes out that all these tea party groups were filing for 501's not 528's, which is what they should have been given they are POLITICAL organizations. But with a 501 exemption they don't have to disclose their donors. Ahh context is a ngr once again. So in 2010 there was a rush of tea party organizations filing for 501c3's, and the IRS was dutifully holding them up and analyzing whether this is fraudulent or not. These organizations now can meddle in elections unfettered because of the election bill passed by the senate, you know, corporations are people too..remember that?. So unless it can be proven that a whole bunch of liberal 501's breezily passed through without a second glance from the IRS, then this case is closed.
 
machine23 said:
Do you even know the history of planned parenthood? That's not even the real name to the original institution. Same agenda, different name.
Click to expand...

Planned Parenthood was founded to thin-out the genetically weak,the poor and minorities. It has stayed true to its mission to this very day.

At least you have to admire their consistency of purpose. That's got to count for something.
 
redsamurai said:
So a tidbit of info comes out that all these tea party groups were filing for 501's not 528's, which is what they should have been given they are POLITICAL organizations. But with a 501 exemption they don't have to disclose their donors. Ahh context is a ngr once again. So in 2010 there was a rush of tea party organizations filing for 501c3's, and the IRS was dutifully holding them up and analyzing whether this is fraudulent or not. These organizations now can meddle in elections unfettered because of the election bill passed by the senate, you know, corporations are people too..remember that?. So unless it can be proven that a whole bunch of liberal 501's breezily passed through without a second glance from the IRS, then this case is closed.
Click to expand...

Oh yeah it is closed. That is why the head of the IRS resigned today. At least you are constantly wrong about everything you post.
 
billfred said:
So now that the head of the IRS has resigned, what do you think?
Click to expand...

Same story every time something like this happens. It's always resignations. How about we start throwing people in jail. With this, Benghazi, and them tapping into journalist phones, this is just crazy. But no one will get in trouble. Just business as usual. Just another example how this country is in the shit hole.
 
mrplunkey said:
They should do that investigation too!

He can blame the sequester as the reason that he can't afford more people to straighten-out his corrupt, Chicago-style administration.
Click to expand...

Hahahha.... They been using that excuse for everything. If a tree falls and doesn't get picked up for 3 days, they blame it on sequester.
 
billfred said:
Oh yeah it is closed. That is why the head of the IRS resigned today. At least you are constantly wrong about everything you post.
Click to expand...

Isn't that weird?

I've considered opening a hedge fund based on Redsam. We'd just ask him what he would do and bet against that.

It might generate billions. Want in?
 
mrplunkey said:
Planned Parenthood was founded to thin-out the genetically weak,the poor and minorities. It has stayed true to its mission to this very day.

At least you have to admire their consistency of purpose. That's got to count for something.
Click to expand...

If those people only knew the type of people they were supporting. Well I guess you have your "useful idiots"
 
mrplunkey said:
Of course it was criminal. That's a no-brainer.
Click to expand...

So, who is going to be the booty warrior's next celly? :confused:

3rhvrt.jpg
 
billfred said:
Oh yeah it is closed. That is why the head of the IRS resigned today. At least you are constantly wrong about everything you post.
Click to expand...


Of course he was made to resign. There's absolutely nothing astonishing about that. Perception is reality so when something like this comes out someone has to be fired, or "resign". lol
There's nothing here. A bunch of Tea party dbags wanted tax exemption without disclosing donors. For the record no liberal political organization should be allowed to do this either. Why a political organization would even be considered for 501 status is beyond me. All of those should be immediately revoked no matter the political affiliation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

UGL OZ
[UGL OZ] Back In Stock: Mast E, Mast P, Rip Blend
Replies
7
Views
949
abolone
abolone
Liquid Gold Labs
  • Sticky
Silver Supplier 💎 Liquid Gold Labs Updates + Announcements 💎
Replies
7
Views
2K
Coolguy77711
Coolguy77711
FishyAnchovy
Approved Log My Orals-Only Pre-Cycle LOG
Replies
21
Views
3K
MUSTANG_18
MUSTANG_18
Richardbrown
Napsgear: The Role of Genetics in Bodybuilding: What You Need to Know
Replies
1
Views
1K
stevesmi
stevesmi
Richardbrown
Napsgear : 10 SUPERIOR ALTERNATIVES TO SISSY SQUATS
Replies
13
Views
3K
Tiger Salman Khan
Tiger Salman Khan
Top Bottom