Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

In a Quandry...Pic...

MightyMouse69 said:
Some pretty shallow sheet being thrown around here.

Java, after you get to know her she may become even more beautiful to you, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

It's interesting how it is still completely socially acceptable for a woman to be judged purely on the basis of her beauty (or lack thereof) but if a man is judged on the basis of his success (or lack thereof) then EVERYONE is up in arms.

Go figure. :whatever:
 
I thought you had a girlfriend bro?
This a side dish?
Any chic, or person for that matter that implies independence is one of their stronger qualities, than wants to represent herself through a pic that subtly conveys a sort of seductive submissiveness, would only confuse me... that said, I agree with BM and MM69 that if this is not a joke, then give it a shot over a cup of joe. Not into her at all physically, but like MM69 said looks change so much with personality, maybe a bad pic too.
 
BIKINIMOM said:
It's interesting how it is still completely socially acceptable for a woman to be judged purely on the basis of her beauty (or lack thereof) but if a man is judged on the basis of his success (or lack thereof) then EVERYONE is up in arms.

Go figure. :whatever:

She sent a pic to a guy she barely knows...

On a bed...

On all fours...

Trying to look sultry...

I'm pretty sure she opened the door to be "judged purely on the basis of her beauty" all on her own.
 
I'd hit it. looks like you could fit both nuts in that mouth.
 
mrplunkey said:
She sent a pic to a guy she barely knows...

On a bed...

On all fours...

Trying to look sultry...

I'm pretty sure she opened the door to be "judged purely on the basis of her beauty" all on her own.

I wasn't disagreeing with ANYONE being aloud to judge a woman based purely on her beauty alone even if the pic HAD been tastefull (which is was not).

That pic is a perfect example of how a woman could be completely clothed and still be photographed in a way where she would look totally trashy. I am thinkin this girl can't be very bright if by the age of 36 she hasn't yet figured this out. So then my next question is, if Java doesn't really find her all that physically appealing, what is that is attracting him? Surely it can't be her mind that is attracting him to the point where he would even consider going on a date?
 
BIKINIMOM said:
I wasn't disagreeing with ANYONE being aloud to judge a woman based purely on her beauty alone even if the pic HAD been tastefull (which is was not).

That pic is a perfect example of how a woman could be completely clothed and still be photographed in a way that she would look totally trashy. I am thinkin this girl can't be very bright if by the age of 36 she hasn't yet figured this out. So then my next question is, if Java doesn't really find her all that physically appealing, what is that that is attracting him? Surely it can't be her mind that is attracting him to the point where he would even consider going on a date?

Hard to speak for Java -- maybe its just "chemistry". Maybe he likes some other aspect of her (i.e. personality).

My personal guess is its probably an effort-versus-reward thing. Guys claim to have high standards when they are looking for a real dating situations but when its a zero-effort, few-shots at sex deal they'll let standards drop considerably. That's something lesser attractive girls never seem to get -- "No chicka, he's texting you 8 times a day because he knows he can come over one night and tag you with little or no effort. Its not because he's 'infatuated' with you or because you are 'so hot'. He's texting four other girls just like you."
 
mrplunkey said:
Hard to speak for Java -- maybe its just "chemistry". Maybe he likes some other aspect of her (i.e. personality).

My personal guess is its probably an effort-versus-reward thing. Guys claim to have high standards when they are looking for a real dating situations but when its a zero-effort, few-shots at sex deal they'll let standards drop considerably. That's something lesser attractive girls never seem to get -- "No chicka, he's texting you 8 times a day because he knows he can come over one night and tag you with little or no effort. Its not because he's 'infatuated' with you or because you are 'so hot'. He's texting four other girls just like you."

LOL

I get pissed all over when I lay it down for women like that. Glad to hear this coming straight from A MAN.
 
BIKINIMOM said:
Aside from the ridiculous outfit and trashy pose sent to a man that she's never even met, believe it or not her face may not be as busted IRL as in the pic. It might just be the angle of the shot. If she raised her head a bit then her chin would not disappear.

Are there any other pics of her face? Maybe she chose that pic because in her mind the background and outfit make her look *sexy*.

As for the rest, 36 never married, engaged couple times but "too independent to be married"? screams "something ain't right". About the "can't have kids" thing... the combination is odd. Maybe she IS transgendered. :whatever:

If your conversations w/her have been enjoyable and don't seem off to you, then why not meet her for a cup of coffee? You will invest an hour of your time and spend like 10 bucks? If you like her then make plans to go out for real, if not, then who cares?

and how is that different from posting soft porn pics on the web and having them viewed by hundreds of men you have never met?
teehee
 
Top Bottom