Mandinka2 said:
I have to say that is one of the most manipulative and foul posts I have ever read on this board. This guy is undoubtedly extremely hurt and you are telling him about why he shouldn't "mistreat" his wife. You are using what his kids would think of him if he "mistreated" her , by for example withdrawing his financial support , calling him a "prick" for doing so. If the children are mature and grow one day to believe in love then they will respect their fathers decision unless they are manipulated by their mother. They will also know that the happiness of their Dad is also worth something and will wish him to find someone who will return his love and fidelity with the same. You clearly have told your kids many times of the weaknesses of their father which is ok , but out of respect for their mother this man has not which is very honourable but at some stage I believe that they should know the truth as to why their Dad left. I can only echo the many empirical statements here that one who cheats once will do so again and also that I also found out this the hard way... Good luck Bro , and sorry for your trouble.
I am sorry that you feel that way Mandinka. I think, perhaps you misunderstood my comments.
If a woman has been left home to care for her children and the household and she did NOT work outside the home then she has no money and no job experience. REGARDLESS of why a marriage is dissolved BOTH are entitled to be in their children's lives. (Unless, of course there is a REAL REASON ie danger to the children or themselves) If EITHER the man OR the woman has been home raising the children and they are still young, WHOM SHALL BE CARING FOR THEM AFTER THEY SPLIT?
I NEVER EVER SAID THAT SHE SHOULD CONTINUE TO AFFORD THE SAME FINANCIAL FREEDOM THAT SHE DID WHILE SHE MAINTAINED HER HALF OF THE MARITAL AGREEMENT.
ALL I SAID WAS THAT IT WAS UNFAIR TO THE CHILDREN FOR THE MAN TO PURPOSELY IMPOSE SEVERE FINANCIAL HARDSHIP ON HIS WIFE OUT OF VENGENCE AS IT WOULD ONLY HURT THE CHILDREN.... JUST AS IT WOULD BE EQUALLY HURTFUL TO THE CHILDREN IF THE WOMAN WAS TO KEEP THE CHILDREN FROM THEIR FATHER OUT OF VENGENCE.
Did you not understand that?
I have tried (though admittedly I am human and have made remarks in the past that I should not have. I have apoligized to the girls and explained that I didn't mean to hurt them, but that I was speaking out of fear and anger and that it didn't make it right.) to hide just how much of a PRICK my husband has been to me but it is hard to hide such things when YOUR SISTER IS THE ONE BUYING GROCERIES AND THE ONE BUYING CLOTHING FOR YOUR CHILDREN.... Do you think that my children do not KNOW what their father is doing? Do you think that they are STUPID? Do you think that they do not have high contempt for their father because HE DOESN'T CARE that THEY ARE BEING HURT BECAUSE OF HIS ANGER?!
I do not defend their father, that is true. Those days are long over. But I neither attack him. I only speak truth. I have yet to assassinate his character either to the children OR in a court of law. The only thing that I have ever said about my ex is that he clearly loves our girls, no doubt... BUT HE HATES ME MORE.
Hate is hate no matter what the cause. The end result is the same... NOTHING GOOD.
All I ever said is that when EITHER PARTY - be it man or woman acts out of hate for thier ex it will NEVER be in the best interest of their children... as THE CHILDREN LOVE BOTH THE MOTHER AND THE FATHER REGARDLESS OF ALL THEIR FAILINGS AND HUMAN WEAKNESSES.
I am truly sorry if you can not understand this.
If you really think that I care A FAHOOTIE for a woman who is so selfish that she can not see past her OWN NEEDS to what the needs of her children are, then I must be speaking a language that is foreign to you, or I have clearly NOT explained myself properly... for this I do apologize.