very uncomparable, on many levels, but in the spectrum of "wrong" id say sex with a child does much more damage to the child than sex with an animal does to the animal.
but in terms of sickness with the person committing the act, id say its a toss up
Abuse/torture is "evil," whether the creature it's committed on has the ability for abstract thought and language is academic.
Just because animals don't show suffering the same way humans do, doesn't mean they don't suffer. If you're interested in some truly facinating conjecture in animal intelligence read "Animal Communcation" by Temple Grandin.
Abuse/torture is "evil," whether the creature it's committed on has the ability for abstract thought and language is academic.
Just because animals don't show suffering the same way humans do, doesn't mean they don't suffer. If you're interested in some truly facinating conjecture in animal intelligence read "Animal Communcation" by Temple Grandin.
You're assuming the animal is enjoying itself because it's experiences a reflex action? Orgasm is essentially a reflex response to stimulous.
SubZ, if someone were to overpower you and stimulate your prostate you would orgasm. Would you like that?
I'm not going to beat this point to death, you're right, I suspect at least a good portion of the male animals experience physical pleasure. Many children who are sexually abused also experience physical pleasure. Does that make it right or make the crime less wrong?
#2 there are plenty of people will do anything if they're desperate enough or if you offer them enough money. if you gave someone the choice to starve to death or do animal porn i'm sure you'd have alot of volunteers rising to the occasion