Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply US-PHARMACIES UGL OZ
Raptor Labs UGFREAK OxygenPharm
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplyUS-PHARMACIES UGL OZUGFREAKRaptor LabsOxygenPharm

Fat and stupid in America

OMGWTFBBQ

brobe
I spent my Thanksgiving in America. I was surrounded by the fat and the stupid - frequently many would fill those descriptions in one loud and obnoxious flesh package.

People driving around in their monstrosities, totally oblivious to the world around them, looking desperately for new things that they can buy on credit to try to fill the void in their life.

I don't know what is more pathetic - those people and their cluelessness, or the fact that I will spend my life continually searching for ways to take those people's money.

To my credit, I didn't even hit anyone throughout the entire trip. Although I can think of about 10 times when I had to show great restraint.
 
I was in North Carolina, but flew in through Philly and then down south.

It had been over 6 months since I had seen a woman on a cell phone drive her SUV over a curb and into a sign and then back into the road cutting off people to do a U-turn - all seemingly oblivious to the fact that she indeed wasn't the only person on the road.

Fortunately I did stay away from malls or else I think I likely would have gone on a throttling spree of the overweight.
 
well north carolina isn't the model state of America bro. Lots of retarted hicks in that state that still think the civil war is going on. But regardless, America, love it or leave it!
 
I have lived in Virginia, New York, Massachusetts, North Carolina, and New Jersey, although briefly on some of those.
Spent time in many more states beyond that (I've never been in Washington state, Wyoming, North/South Dakota, Iowa, Nebraska, Hawaii, or Alaska - other than that, I think I have been around all of the others - I am likely missing 2 or so more).

From what I have seen, America is all the same. Some areas are flatter, some areas have more mountains - but in the end, Americans are all the same. The American way of life has become "the overweight consumer" and all too much of that includes a Christian bent for my likes.

As for "like it or leave it" - you don't read my posts I guess - I am from the States and I moved away.
 
OMGWTFBBQ said:

I don't know what is more pathetic - those people and their cluelessness, or the fact that I will spend my life continually searching for ways to take those people's money.

Those people and their cluelessness...how could searching for ways to take their money be pathetic?
 
When coming back to the US after a long time, it always strikes me how many fat and/or (usually "and") annoying (read: not cool) cogs there are. I strongly dislike it. Contrary to what many people will believe, I am just observing what I see.

At the same time, there are plenty of great people and things in the US. However, it's difficult to remove the layer of lard coating everything. The US is a very easy and comfortable place for me to be --- I'll give it that.
 
OMGWTFBBQ said:
To my credit, I didn't even hit anyone throughout the entire trip. Although I can think of about 10 times when I had to show great restraint.
I don't usually want to hit anyone, but I definitely need to restrain myself when I see the first fat guy at the airport on the flight into the US. That's when the readjustment period begins. Culture shock can be a bitch.
 
I actually don't really have any issue with fat people. They can do whatever the hell they want with their bodies.
And I honestly don't have any issue with stupid people - they can do whatever they want to themselves and go on however they like - American is a free country.

What annoys me is when that behavior then has a direct effect on those around them. It is one thing to do whatever the fuck you want for yourself, but when you start expecting everyone around you to drop everything and respond to you, that is where I find issues in it.

I was getting on one flight and the fact that the line wasn't moving fast enough bothered a fat old lady behind me. She said "I don't know what they are waiting on, they are just looking around at the birds."
Her voice was grating and whiney - it took much restraint for me not to turn around and say "wow! your holiday spirit is contagious!" and then shake her to death just to reduce the weight of the plane.
The real beauty was that she was sitting right next to me on the flight as well. She was making little whining and complaining noises the whole time. Fortunately it wasn't a long flight.

There were a ton of instances of it. People standing in the security line that were knocking me around simply because their fat bodies didn't do well in crowds.
And those people were audible voicing their concern that they would miss their flight due to the security line - also noting that they didn't see why they had to get their so early for their flight.
Then they would ask each person that they saw if they could be moved to the front of the line since they had been waiting for "hours" (even though they got in line at the same time as me and I had been there less than 45 mins).
Then they refused to take off their shoes because "I have a hard time reaching my shoes."

It was all very trying.
 
The nicest part of being in America is that I can drive somewhere relatively nearby and buy nearly anything.
That is something that isn't as easy here - being a mass consumer.
 
"What annoys me is when that behavior then has a direct effect on those around them. It is one thing to do whatever the fuck you want for yourself, but when you start expecting everyone around you to drop everything and respond to you, that is where I find issues in it."

I agree
 
HS, you need to go and check out a NAAFA meet-up... how they promote gluttony and feederism is utterly sickening.


Then again, obesity isn't caused by lack of self-discipline, or lack of poor diet, it's caused by thyroid problems, viruses, and medication

:rolleyes:
 
You seem to exude a lot of resentment. People normally don't have a desire to describe others in such venomous terms unless they have serious insecurities on their own part - realized or not.

Funny how you see nothing but negative about the people that are the most productive workers in the world (generate the most GDP per hour of work), work more hours than in any western Euro country, and have the highest average purchasing parity income in the world and a majority of the world's Nobel prize winners, despite having only 5% of the world's population.

Maybe you should talk to someone about your personal anger and frustration.
 
BBQ

I feel your pain. The security line story certainly rings some bells.

I find myself in similar situations often; I've made a point of answering their rhetorical whining with pointed answers in a pleasing, calm tone of voice.

Example:

FattyWhiney "If thisline doesn't speed up I am going to miss my plane.?"

Skywalker: "Most people are aware that this is a holiday weekend and travel picks up. Perhaps you could have arrived here earlier".

:)
 
OMGWTFBBQ said:
I spent my Thanksgiving in America. I was surrounded by the fat and the stupid - frequently many would fill those descriptions in one loud and obnoxious flesh package.

People driving around in their monstrosities, totally oblivious to the world around them, looking desperately for new things that they can buy on credit to try to fill the void in their life.

I don't know what is more pathetic - those people and their cluelessness, or the fact that I will spend my life continually searching for ways to take those people's money.

To my credit, I didn't even hit anyone throughout the entire trip. Although I can think of about 10 times when I had to show great restraint.

LOL.....

I get that a lot when coming back from Europe.

Fonz
 
Synpax said:


Funny how you see nothing but negative about the people that are the most productive workers in the world (generate the most GDP per hour of work), work more hours than in any western Euro country, and have the highest average purchasing parity income in the world and a majority of the world's Nobel prize winners, despite having only 5% of the world's population.

Maybe you should talk to someone about your personal anger and frustration.

Yes but I guarantee that they make up only 10% of the US population and are not fat and ugly!
 
I wish more people would tell me to leave America when I in fact don't live there.

My family is there and I was visiting them.
 
OMGWTFBBQ said:
I actually don't really have any issue with fat people. They can do whatever the hell they want with their bodies.
And I honestly don't have any issue with stupid people - they can do whatever they want to themselves and go on however they like - American is a free country.

What annoys me is when that behavior then has a direct effect on those around them. It is one thing to do whatever the fuck you want for yourself, but when you start expecting everyone around you to drop everything and respond to you, that is where I find issues in it.

I was getting on one flight and the fact that the line wasn't moving fast enough bothered a fat old lady behind me. She said "I don't know what they are waiting on, they are just looking around at the birds."
Her voice was grating and whiney - it took much restraint for me not to turn around and say "wow! your holiday spirit is contagious!" and then shake her to death just to reduce the weight of the plane.
The real beauty was that she was sitting right next to me on the flight as well. She was making little whining and complaining noises the whole time. Fortunately it wasn't a long flight.

There were a ton of instances of it. People standing in the security line that were knocking me around simply because their fat bodies didn't do well in crowds.
And those people were audible voicing their concern that they would miss their flight due to the security line - also noting that they didn't see why they had to get their so early for their flight.
Then they would ask each person that they saw if they could be moved to the front of the line since they had been waiting for "hours" (even though they got in line at the same time as me and I had been there less than 45 mins).
Then they refused to take off their shoes because "I have a hard time reaching my shoes."

It was all very trying.

WOW!! Your post was filled with little anecdotal examples of human nature that I can find in nearly every part of the world:o In a nation of 300 million you can find aspects of it that annoy you! Astounding!?!?! How did we ever make it without your amazing skills of observation, Sherlock?

As for weight, the US is showing the consequences of economic liberty. A free market system allows for greater access to goods, food being one, that centrally planned or heavily regulated societies do not. What a person does with goods (food) is their choice, and their burden to bear, unless you wish to live in a totalitarian system, where every aspect of life is regulated.

Learn how to think objectively and then you will not be so uptight about shit that means less than nothing in the grand scheme of life. Until then, your whining is just as annoying as the old crotchety lady you complained about.
 
atlantabiolab said:


WOW!! Your post was filled with little anecdotal examples of human nature that I can find in nearly every part of the world:o In a nation of 300 million you can find aspects of it that annoy you! Astounding!?!?! How did we ever make it without your amazing skills of observation, Sherlock?

As for weight, the US is showing the consequences of economic liberty. A free market system allows for greater access to goods, food being one, that centrally planned or heavily regulated societies do not. What a person does with goods (food) is their choice, and their burden to bear, unless you wish to live in a totalitarian system, where every aspect of life is regulated.

Learn how to think objectively and then you will not be so uptight about shit that means less than nothing in the grand scheme of life. Until then, your whining is just as annoying as the old crotchety lady you complained about.


translation: i'm fat.
 
somebody
anybody
everybody

SCREEEEEEEEEEEAM
 
atlantabiolab said:



As for weight, the US is showing the consequences of economic liberty. A free market system allows for greater access to goods, food being one, that centrally planned or heavily regulated societies do not. What a person does with goods (food) is their choice, and their burden to bear, unless you wish to live in a totalitarian system, where every aspect of life is regulated.


If being fat and stupid is the consequence of economic liberty give me poverty anyday, at least then I'll have an excuse to whine.
 
OMGWTFBBQ said:
I spent my Thanksgiving in America. I was surrounded by the fat and the stupid - frequently many would fill those descriptions in one loud and obnoxious flesh package.

People driving around in their monstrosities, totally oblivious to the world around them, looking desperately for new things that they can buy on credit to try to fill the void in their life.

I don't know what is more pathetic - those people and their cluelessness, or the fact that I will spend my life continually searching for ways to take those people's money.

To my credit, I didn't even hit anyone throughout the entire trip. Although I can think of about 10 times when I had to show great restraint.

i feel your pain.

we are becoming
degenerate wastes of meat
 
atlantabiolab said:


WOW!! Your post was filled with little anecdotal examples of human nature that I can find in nearly every part of the world

I can think of 3 countries that you would never find it in - all in varying degrees of prosperity.

I maintain that America is "teh suk".

I also maintain that you too are teh suk. And like someone else said, you totally have to be a fat slob.
 
this post reminds me of a tape howard stern got a hold of. it was kate hudson (goldie hawn's daughter) going on about how GAUCHE and loud americans are, with their "piles of food" and "please pass the ketchup!"

meanwhile kate seems to have forgotten she was born the daughter of a movie star, had her movie star career handed to her, is rich, and beautiful. she would this life somewhere else? she had no idea how awful and pretentious she came off.

btw, i am thin and successful. so are most of my friends and family. fat people don't bother me.
 
Last edited:
I feel your pain as well. I travel to the US a lot, almost always driving so I've passed through many states. It's remarkable to me how many fat people there are. Not trying to generalize, but there is a noticeable difference when I come back home. Texas....oh man I don't think I saw a "normal" sized Texan when I was down there. lol
 
OMGWTFBBQ said:


I can think of 3 countries that you would never find it in - all in varying degrees of prosperity.

Post them and I will show you that they do not reach the level of economic freedom that the US maintains.

If you truly think that other non-US countries are somehow the bastions of intelligence and manners, then you are fucking clueless. There is no lack of stupidity in foreign nations, nor rudeness.

As for obesity rates, yes the US leads all other countries, mainly because our "poor" are even capable of purchasing enough food to create obesity. Very few countries have such an abundance of cheap food as the US. How a person eats and maintains their physique is their problem. Not to mention affordability of automobiles is greater in the US, allowing for again even our "poor" access to cars, thus reducing their need to walk everywhere.

I maintain that America is "teh suk".

I also maintain that you too are teh suk. And like someone else said, you totally have to be a fat slob.

Since you have presented nothing, your post remains nothing. Bring on something of substance or else accept your ass being handed to you.

You bitch like a little girl.
 
atlantabiolab said:

You bitch like a little girl.

I also hit like one.

You are essentially arguing that because Americans "can" do something, they should. Why buy an SUV? Because we can. Why overeat? Because we can.

This is the attitude that pisses off the rest of the world, and then when they bitch slap America, they all act shocked.
Like the popular girl at the prom getting pushed into the punch bowl.

Norway, Bermuda, Iceland, New Zealand, etc - all countries that I have seen better attitudes in the people, and better overall general public health.

Not to say that there aren't more (I'd probably even say that France is in there - but I hate the French) - but those are the ones that I have the most experience with as of late.
Also a lot of Canada, but I have seen my share of the American attitudes at the borders.
 
OMGWTFBBQ said:


I also hit like one.

You are essentially arguing that because Americans "can" do something, they should. Why buy an SUV? Because we can. Why overeat? Because we can.

No, ignoramus, I am arguing that we have the "freedom" to do so. The personal morals entailed in each action are for each individual to decide, but as your argument implies, you feel that people should not even be given the opportunity to make choices. Europeans live in a delusional state believing that they chose to restrict their opportunities by volition, instead of the reality, that special interest groups and government regulatory agencies prevent them from having the freedom TO obtain what they wish.

Norway, Bermuda, Iceland, New Zealand, etc - all countries that I have seen better attitudes in the people, and better overall general public health.

You must be joking. These countries have nothing even close to the availability of goods that the US has, not to mention economies that barely rival some of our small states. Their tax heavy economies prevent their citizens from obtaining what our "poor" citizens have, not to mention it creates a disincentive for personal success.
 
atlantabiolab said:
Their tax heavy economies prevent their citizens from obtaining what our "poor" citizens have, not to mention it creates a disincentive for personal success.

I suppose you probably aren't talking about Bermuda so much on this one.

The only thing the States has going for it over Bermuda is that the gas is cheaper, and you are allowed the monstrosities on the roads.
That and the States has economies of scale on their side for internet services and electronics in the marketplace.

All in all, I still maintain that America is the land of the fat and the stupid. I could walk down the street swinging a dead cat over my head and smack 15 SUVs in one block, half of them being driven by someone doing something stupid.

If you are proud about that, then more power to you.
 
atlantabiolab said:


No, ignoramus, I am arguing that we have the "freedom" to do so. The personal morals entailed in each action are for each individual to decide, but as your argument implies, you feel that people should not even be given the opportunity to make choices. Europeans live in a delusional state believing that they chose to restrict their opportunities by volition, instead of the reality, that special interest groups and government regulatory agencies prevent them from having the freedom TO obtain what they wish.



You must be joking. These countries have nothing even close to the availability of goods that the US has, not to mention economies that barely rival some of our small states. Their tax heavy economies prevent their citizens from obtaining what our "poor" citizens have, not to mention it creates a disincentive for personal success.

LOL@ignoramus

You need to get out of the US and explore the world.

Books and TV just don't cut it.

Fonz
 
OMGWTFBBQ said:


I suppose you probably aren't talking about Bermuda so much on this one.

The only thing the States has going for it over Bermuda is that the gas is cheaper, and you are allowed the monstrosities on the roads.
That and the States has economies of scale on their side for internet services and electronics in the marketplace.

All in all, I still maintain that America is the land of the fat and the stupid. I could walk down the street swinging a dead cat over my head and smack 15 SUVs in one block, half of them being driven by someone doing something stupid.

If you are proud about that, then more power to you.

Another anti-SUV whiner...is there nothing more worrisome in the world than a person having a large vehicle? Not to mention that every pathetic argument against these "monstrosities" is nothing more than class envy and misguided morality, wrapped up in specious "social good" rhetoric .

This European arrogance which detests the US' availability of choice is getting old. They seem to think that since they can only affordably purchase "wind up" cars, that the rest of the world should follow suit.

Ever read Aesop's Fables: the Fox and his Tail? Every child should know, "misery loves company".
 
I see the anti-suv movement as a argument with many faces. The majority, I think, has to do with the fact that there are so many out there and people always attack what is "popular". Same way there are people who attack cars from japan or minivans.

Hummer really is that poster child for the class envy. However, I feel that people really shouldn't envy those in Hummers simply because they just aren't that easy to live with, especially as a daily driver.

To me, personally, I see the suv and truck as the last stop in big american muscle. Of course in a few years V8s and RWD will be finding their way into more and more american cars, I still see suvs and trucks filling that gap.

In other countries cars are smaller mainly because gas prices. There are also taxes based on the size of your engine. City layouts also have a role to play in what kind of car because popular.
 
CheeseDick said:
I see the anti-suv movement as a argument with many faces. The majority, I think, has to do with the fact that there are so many out there and people always attack what is "popular". Same way there are people who attack cars from japan or minivans.

Hummer really is that poster child for the class envy. However, I feel that people really shouldn't envy those in Hummers simply because they just aren't that easy to live with, especially as a daily driver.

To me, personally, I see the suv and truck as the last stop in big american muscle. Of course in a few years V8s and RWD will be finding their way into more and more american cars, I still see suvs and trucks filling that gap.

In other countries cars are smaller mainly because gas prices. There are also taxes based on the size of your engine. City layouts also have a role to play in what kind of car because popular.

Actual good post. Are you sick or something?
 
atlantabiolab said:


Another anti-SUV whiner...is there nothing more worrisome in the world than a person having a large vehicle? Not to mention that every pathetic argument against these "monstrosities" is nothing more than class envy and misguided morality, wrapped up in specious "social good" rhetoric .

This European arrogance which detests the US' availability of choice is getting old. They seem to think that since they can only affordably purchase "wind up" cars, that the rest of the world should follow suit.

Ever read Aesop's Fables: the Fox and his Tail? Every child should know, "misery loves company".

Personally I think too many people have SUVs, and by that i am reffering to too many people that don't seem to understand how to drive them (i.e. they are speeding along not takin turns correctly or taking 20mins to park in almost two spots).

That being said I'm not against SUVs in and of themselves. I for instance drive a Jeep as at 6'4" most cars arent very comfortable.
 
collegiateLifter said:


Personally I think too many people have SUVs, and by that i am reffering to too many people that don't seem to understand how to drive them (i.e. they are speeding along not takin turns correctly or taking 20mins to park in almost two spots).

That being said I'm not against SUVs in and of themselves. I for instance drive a Jeep as at 6'4" most cars arent very comfortable.

I think you're dead on with your first sentence as to why there's a backlash against suvs.
 
atlantabiolab said:


Europeans live in a delusional state believing that they chose to restrict their opportunities by volition, instead of the reality, that special interest groups and government regulatory agencies prevent them from having the freedom TO obtain what they wish.


Just a question - you ever been to Europe?
 
atlantabiolab said:




As for obesity rates, yes the US leads all other countries, mainly because our "poor" are even capable of purchasing enough food to create obesity. Very few countries have such an abundance of cheap food as the US.


No, the poor can only afford poor quality food, completely processed and packed with fats and refined carbs, couple with that an often sedentary lifestyle and you got yourself a big bunch of fatties.
 
atlantabiolab said:


Another anti-SUV whiner...is there nothing more worrisome in the world than a person having a large vehicle? Not to mention that every pathetic argument against these "monstrosities" is nothing more than class envy and misguided morality, wrapped up in specious "social good" rhetoric .

This European arrogance which detests the US' availability of choice is getting old. They seem to think that since they can only affordably purchase "wind up" cars, that the rest of the world should follow suit.

Ever read Aesop's Fables: the Fox and his Tail? Every child should know, "misery loves company".

I'm not at all an anti-SUV whiner - I think they are great and serve their purpose on occasion depending on who drives it.
As for your reference to "every pathetic argument", that would appear to imply that my argument is pathetic, and therefore follows the negative path that you reference, and which you obviously believe that since it differs from your own (perhaps misguided) opinion, it is wrong.

I think an SUV is absolutely essential if you are going off-road. If you live in the country where you have a long driveway that isn't paved and is hilly with large ruts in it, the Honda Civic is just not going to get you there, nor is a Porsche. You need something that has high ground clearance and ideally 4 wheel drive connected to knobby tires.
You want it to be torsionally strong for obvious reasons, and therefore the reinforced frame is going to weigh more.

That said, I think we can all agree that out of all of the SUV owners, hardly any of them actually take it off road aside from the edge of the soccer field parking lot or the occasional poor driving skills that land them up on the sidewalk.
Not to mention that the luxury SUVs that are becoming more and more prevalent largely because of their beautiful profit margin for the companies and the willing public - they would just get all scratched up were you to take them offroad - and your moch-chino might spill out of any number of the 30 cupholders inside.

I don't like the SUVs - not because they guzzle gas. If someone wants to pay more for gas, more power to them - I own stock in some of the petroleum refining companies - I enjoy making money off of people.
I don't like SUVs - not because a lot of people have them. A lot of people have Honda Civics and I don't give a shit if people own them - I wouldn't want one myself, but that is different.

The reason I don't like SUVs is because it gives people with poor driving skills the impression that they are invincible. They drive too fast in bad weather because they think their car can handle it. They are bigger than those around them, so they get lackadaisical because they can. They can change lanes without looking or signaling because people have to get out of their way or suffer damage.
Their height on the road makes it easier for the driver to see around were they to put their cell phone down, take their hands off of the kid in the backseat, and face the road. But that height then puts their lights into the eye level of people driving cars. That height blocks the view of surrounding traffic for other drivers. And that height makes them more likely to roll over when they pull some dumb ass move at speeds that the tires weren't designed for - meaning that the ensuing crash puts me at danger of being part of their 4 ton ballet of shattered glass and screaming metal.

If everyone started driving Kias or Pintos, I would be equally disturbed because of their danger in crashes.
SUVs would be safe if absolutely everyone had the same thing - then the mass disadvantage in a wreck would be negated and it would only be a matter of speed and safety accoutrements on the inside.
But instead, not everyone can afford an SUV, or even wants one - so then they are put in harms way by everyone that does have one. The mass of a Excursion will always win out over the mass of a VW Golf.
Hell, everyone could drive motorcycles and it would be safer - but once you add in a car to the equation, they are no longer safe.

As for you reference to the European argument - I am American. I have lived in America all of my life. I don't live in Europe now, and I don't live in America now.
The countries that I listed aren't even really all in Europe (granted, some are).
Why your frequent references to how you dislike what they do - misguided or not - has little or nothing to do with the arguments that are being put forth.
 
tuc biscuit said:



No, the poor can only afford poor quality food, completely processed and packed with fats and refined carbs, couple with that an often sedentary lifestyle and you got yourself a big bunch of fatties.

The US also has access to cheap quality cuts of meat. But this is irrelevant as there are numerous alternatives to any one food product in the US and it is up to the individual to decide what they will or will not do.
 
But which country wipes their ass' the most with baby whipes?

Find that answer and you got something concrete.
 
Some thoughts on obesity:

The causal network surrounding obesity is a lot more complex than the availability and cost of food.

Not only is food cheap and available in the US (which is fine), but the rate at which Americans consume processed foods per availability of food unit is higher in the US than in other nations in the world. The cause of obesity cannot be readily observed to my knowledge. Therefore, my distaste for obesity is not petty.

I don't want to kill fat people, and I don't personally hate them. However, it bothers me that so many people in the US are fat.
 
atlantabiolab said:


You must be joking. These countries have nothing even close to the availability of goods that the US has,



not to mention economies that barely rival some of our small states.



Their tax heavy economies prevent their citizens from obtaining what our "poor" citizens have, not to mention it creates a disincentive for personal success. [/B]

You win this weeks "Head so far up his ass you can tell what he had for breakfast from his ring around the collar" Award.

We have ZERO homeless, ZERO uninsured, ZERO kids shooting each other in school, 100% literacy, every product imaginable, and very robust economy with sustained (and may i say SUSTAINABLE) 6-7% growth.

Seems to me personal success would be taking care of your HEALTHY family, past and present and future generations included, as opposed to the incredibly stupid "how many SUV's you dont need, how much McCrap you can eat and how many new inches you can add to your waistline" barometer that you use for measurement.

Stick that in your corncob pipe and smoke it, Buford.
 
ChefWide said:


You win this weeks "Head so far up his ass you can tell what he had for breakfast from his ring around the collar" Award.

We have ZERO homeless, ZERO uninsured, ZERO kids shooting each other in school, 100% literacy, every product imaginable, and very robust economy with sustained (and may i say SUSTAINABLE) 6-7% growth.

Seems to me personal success would be taking care of your HEALTHY family, past and present and future generations included, as opposed to the incredibly stupid "how many SUV's you dont need, how much McCrap you can eat and how many new inches you can add to your waistline" barometer that you use for measurement.

Stick that in your corncob pipe and smoke it, Buford.
So what's the takehome point, put into a sentence or two?
 
Fat people in and of themselves don't bother me. It is the combination of clueless and fat. That is what bothers me.

It bothers me that people can get so far in life being totally clueless to the world around them. Being fat just flaunts it.

America's obesity problem is likely similar to its myriad of other problems that the pharmaceutical world is drooling over - problems that come up when all of your other needs are met.
I'll bet there aren't many Ethiopians with body dystrophia, or worried about their skin, or that break down and cry when the dry cleaners lose their favorite blouse.
 
OMGWTFBBQ said:


I'm not at all an anti-SUV whiner - I think they are great and serve their purpose on occasion depending on who drives it.

Here you start of OK, but then immediately qualify your statements with criteria which "you" feel are acceptable for ownership of such a vehicle.

As for your reference to "every pathetic argument", that would appear to imply that my argument is pathetic, and therefore follows the negative path that you reference, and which you obviously believe that since it differs from your own (perhaps misguided) opinion, it is wrong.

I have heard no good argument from the anti-SUV crowd which even comes close to surpassing the basic right of private property and business freedom.

I think an SUV is absolutely essential if you are going off-road. If you live in the country where you have a long driveway that isn't paved and is hilly with large ruts in it, the Honda Civic is just not going to get you there, nor is a Porsche. You need something that has high ground clearance and ideally 4 wheel drive connected to knobby tires.
You want it to be torsionally strong for obvious reasons, and therefore the reinforced frame is going to weigh more.

That said, I think we can all agree that out of all of the SUV owners, hardly any of them actually take it off road aside from the edge of the soccer field parking lot or the occasional poor driving skills that land them up on the sidewalk.
Not to mention that the luxury SUVs that are becoming more and more prevalent largely because of their beautiful profit margin for the companies and the willing public - they would just get all scratched up were you to take them offroad - and your moch-chino might spill out of any number of the 30 cupholders inside.

Your argument is weak. Again it boils down to ownership of such vehicles MUST be limited to that which you deem appropriate. It is no more rational than the person who whines because a rich man has 10, 50, or 100 cars, claiming that "why do you need so many cars?"

I don't like the SUVs - not because they guzzle gas. If someone wants to pay more for gas, more power to them - I own stock in some of the petroleum refining companies - I enjoy making money off of people.
I don't like SUVs - not because a lot of people have them. A lot of people have Honda Civics and I don't give a shit if people own them - I wouldn't want one myself, but that is different.

The reason I don't like SUVs is because it gives people with poor driving skills the impression that they are invincible. They drive too fast in bad weather because they think their car can handle it. They are bigger than those around them, so they get lackadaisical because they can. They can change lanes without looking or signaling because people have to get out of their way or suffer damage.
Their height on the road makes it easier for the driver to see around were they to put their cell phone down, take their hands off of the kid in the backseat, and face the road. But that height then puts their lights into the eye level of people driving cars. That height blocks the view of surrounding traffic for other drivers. And that height makes them more likely to roll over when they pull some dumb ass move at speeds that the tires weren't designed for - meaning that the ensuing crash puts me at danger of being part of their 4 ton ballet of shattered glass and screaming metal.

If everyone started driving Kias or Pintos, I would be equally disturbed because of their danger in crashes.
SUVs would be safe if absolutely everyone had the same thing - then the mass disadvantage in a wreck would be negated and it would only be a matter of speed and safety accoutrements on the inside.
But instead, not everyone can afford an SUV, or even wants one - so then they are put in harms way by everyone that does have one. The mass of a Excursion will always win out over the mass of a VW Golf.
Hell, everyone could drive motorcycles and it would be safer - but once you add in a car to the equation, they are no longer safe.

This idea of mass security, where everyone lives in a world without danger or fear is the crux of this argument, which again has no bearing in a free society. It is no different than the gun control advocates who scream the same argument, claiming that my possession of such a product endangers their life. The world can go round and round naming the "dangerous product" of the week and demanding stricter control or outlawing of the good itself. In the end, you wind up in a world of no choice, no opportunity, but very secure in your nothingness.

Plus you have misplaced your anger of the driver, since this is the agent of action, onto that of the inanimate object, the car. Cars do nothing, by themselves, just as guns do nothing, by themselves. So, arguing against the vehicle is no different than arguing against guns, while giving pardon to the user of the instrument. Taking away an SUV, due to the poor driving ability of the owner, only puts a bad driver in a smaller car, which you feel at least equals out the odds, somehow. Irrational egalitarinism.

As for you reference to the European argument - I am American. I have lived in America all of my life. I don't live in Europe now, and I don't live in America now.
The countries that I listed aren't even really all in Europe (granted, some are).
Why your frequent references to how you dislike what they do - misguided or not - has little or nothing to do with the arguments that are being put forth.

It is not a direct reference to countries of Europe exclusively, but a term of ideology. It is a reference to the mentality of individuals who have been immersed in socialist democracy and often times have a disdain of America for the reason that we are not "like them". Europeans are condescending to Americans because, as they, we do not have socialized medicine, very loose drug laws, tiny cars, very high gas prices, extensive business regulations, etc. Europe has been the wellspring of this political ideology and has spread to many neighboring countries and is permeating the US, also.
 
OMGWTFBBQ said:
I spent my Thanksgiving in America. I was surrounded by the fat and the stupid - frequently many would fill those descriptions in one loud and obnoxious flesh package.


you shoulda fit right in.
 
plornive said:
So what's the takehome point, put into a sentence or two?

The point? I was replying to a previous post, you can find it, I know you can... ;)
 
This thread is useless without naked pics of sexy women. Please see my thread about the new guidelines about posting in this forum.
 
This thread has turned into how any attempt at a discussion on the net turns:

A: I feel this way.
B: No, you are wrong because I feel this way.
C: You are both wrong because I feel this way.
A: I am not wrong, it is just how I feel.
B: Yes, but it isn't the way I feel, therefore wrong.
C: You are both wrong, and I hate you because you are different.

The next logical step, if this thing makes it long enough, is going to have to be a reference to Hitler or at the very least the Nazis.
 
plornive said:
I probably could... can you?

I would love to either aggree or disagree, but at the moment I can do little else other than ignore. Sorry, what IS the point?
 
dzuljas said:
well north carolina isn't the model state of America bro. Lots of retarted hicks in that state that still think the civil war is going on. But regardless, America, love it or leave it!

America, love it or strive to improve like a true patriot.


Read Common Sense by Tom Paine.
 
Last edited:
u know what annoys me? fat ghetto chicks. my college is full of them, loud, obnoxious, fat, sloppy, and they wonder why dudes on the basketball team go for the anorexic white chicks
 
MattRecc said:
u know what annoys me? fat ghetto chicks. my college is full of them, loud, obnoxious, fat, sloppy, and they wonder why dudes on the basketball team go for the anorexic white chicks

somewhere, bullit is saying to himself, "i'd hit it."
 
WTFDaddylonlegs bro, I am 100% agreement with you. It is simply a case of I am fat and happy and I can drive whatever I want syndrome that comes along with American cockeyness. This is not found in the more cosmopolitan areas, for example, go to New YorK or LA and the go to NC or Alabama, you will see a DISTINCT difference in people. I think this is an attitude MOST prevalent in the lower classes and is due to the economic success of the US as a whole combined with it's military strength. A very interesting social phenomena to say the least.
 
Last edited:
OMGWTFBBQ said:



Norway, Bermuda, Iceland, New Zealand, etc - all countries that I have seen better attitudes in the people, and better overall general public health.


America is basically made of the rest of the world's refugees, so snottiness from old world, all-white nations (exception of Bermuda) is to be expected, just like that of the older brother at the younger sibling who exceeds him in life.

The only thing that matters are overall statistics - just seeing 'attitudes' personally is poor grounds for analysis. A lot of it depends on what part of the country you go to.

Also, with the exception of Bermuda, all of these countries lack the diversity of the US and the massive legal and illegal immigration of the US. That is a tremendous burden on the general public health. It's sort of like comparing Vermont to California.

Of course, the United States has both Vermont and California. There is nothing in those old world countries you can't find right here in some part of the US.

BTW - the only place I've found racist and snoti Americans has been in NYC/North Eastern/New England, and I'm from the poor South.

btw - 7% bf for the ad hominem obsessed.




Norway:
 
ChefWide said:


You win this weeks "Head so far up his ass you can tell what he had for breakfast from his ring around the collar" Award.

We have ZERO homeless, ZERO uninsured, ZERO kids shooting each other in school, 100% literacy, every product imaginable, and very robust economy with sustained (and may i say SUSTAINABLE) 6-7% growth.

OK, since I am amazed at your grasp of statistics (zero, huh? How is this determined statistically, pray tell?) I can tell that I am dealing with a genius here.

Seems to me personal success would be taking care of your HEALTHY family, past and present and future generations included, as opposed to the incredibly stupid "how many SUV's you dont need, how much McCrap you can eat and how many new inches you can add to your waistline" barometer that you use for measurement.

You summed it up, "seems to me". That is all you can say, since personal success is by definition "personal", so it matters not what your opinion on this is, it is up to the individual to decide what they value. This was the basis of my post, that subjective matters of life are not to be regulated as desired by the control freaks on this board, who feel that people should not have a choice in what car they drive, in what foods they eat, in their appearance, etc. It matters not that the appearance of another offends you, get over it and fast, for you have no control over the life of your neighbor. The amusing part is that many who have this opinion consider themselves "socially liberal" and use the label "fascist" in describing certain groups, yet feel perfectly OK to demonize and accept regulations on things they don't condone.

Not to mention, the very idea that the US somehow corners the market on stupidity and rudeness, is once more, ludicrous. You can find morons and assholes everywhere.

Stick that in your corncob pipe and smoke it, Buford.

Sorry, my pipe is already filled with a Twinkie and 10W 40 motor oil, that leaks from my SUV.

On a side note, but still related, because America has more choices than other countries, immigrants show the results of personal choice. Japanese women, who have traditionally low breast cancer rates, show increases in breast cancer rates once migrating to the US. Explanations tend to surround the protective effect of the traditional Japanese diet vs. the Westernized diet they adopt when they come to the US. While this is a personal harm, it shows that given a choice, since no one prevents a Japanese immigrant from eating their traditional diet, people will choose actions which may not promote a long life.

So, you have a decision to make, do you force people to live long lives, by restricting access to what can be shown to be healthy to them or allow them the pursuit of personal happiness, even if it means a reduced lifespan? What is more important, a long life with little opportunity or a shorter one with lots of choices, some of which are not beneficial long term?
 
Last edited:
Who said anything about restricting access to what they eat?

Just because someone expresses an opinion that they dislike stupid fat people doesn't mean that they are also saying they feel those people should be kept from eating the way they do.

It is just an opinion expressing a disagreement with the way they live.

I don't agree with plenty of things that you say, but I've never said that you had to change them - THAT is what America has - freedom for people to do their thing.

And I have the freedom to be disgusted with how people choose to spend their freedom - I never said that they should be forced to change it.

That said, were they to all get together and watch an episode of Oprah and/or Dr. Phil that made up their mind for them to stop being useless consumers (which is a contradiction to the process by which Oprah and/or Dr. Phil works, but ignoring that), and they went on to do interesting things with their lives... well, I'd personally find that just dandy.

An interesting life is all relative, but I would be willing to bet that sitting in front of a TV while mashing a ho-ho into your face isn't considered all that interesting by the populace of the world. (the starving in Sudan very well find it fascinating)

In the end, I maintain that when someone says to me "America", I picture a fat pasty man and woman trying to park their Excursion that they can't afford closer to the doors of WalMart so that they don't have to walk as far to the door. In the little thought bubbles over their heads, I see images of Big Macs dancing jigs and the slightest bit of drool forming at the corner of their lips.
Oh, and these good people are of course God fearin' Christians that think war with Iraq is a dandy idea because he was the one that flew planes into our buildings in NYC.

That is my picture of America, even after living there for 26 years.
 
Top Bottom