Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Evidence that the government is responsible for 9/11 twin towers (movie)

I'm not going to waste my time watching it.Its ridiculous to think that our government is responsible for 9-11
 
I really like A.J., I have met him several times and listened to him too many times to remember, he is on the money to a T with what you just watched, he operates out of Austin. peace
 
Two very interesting points.

Is it possible for a private enterprise, with the possible help of the Government, to orchastrate and carry out the controlled demolition of a structure the size of building 7 in less than 8 hours? Is that even possible?

If not, what does that mean? If Matts theory is correct, wouldnt older buildings located within a closer proximity to the towers have experienced similar structural damage from seismic buffetting? Yet, no other buildings were destroyed or removed except those in comprising the WTC complex.

#2 Why were the entire remains of the destroyed world trade center complex swiftly exported to China without at least initial tests performed on the crash area and related debris to arrive at a more conclusive determination at what actually caused the towers to collapse?


I am not an engineer so I can only ask questions at this point.
 
buddy28 said:
Two very interesting points.

Is it possible for a private enterprise, with the possible help of the Government, to orchastrate and carry out the controlled demolition of a structure the size of building 7 in less than 8 hours? Is that even possible?

Better question is "is it impossible?"



If not, what does that mean? If Matts theory is correct, wouldnt older buildings located within a closer proximity to the towers have experienced similar structural damage from seismic buffetting? Yet, no other buildings were destroyed or removed except those in comprising the WTC complex.

My theory is shaky at best - just asking if it is possible for the foundation to be harmed and if thatcould lead to the kind of collapse of the towers we saw. I don't think it oculd - because even if the foundation were shattered on impact, the towers would not have "imploded".


#2 Why were the entire remains of the destroyed world trade center complex swiftly exported to China without at least initial tests performed on the crash area and related debris to arrive at a more conclusive determination at what actually caused the towers to collapse?

I guess I am ignorantof this point - the wreackage was shipped to China? I remember the footage of the trucks and the workers but I don't remember it going to China.....
 
I just finished watching the video and after watching a Cdn documentary on 9/11 and G.W. this week I have to wonder.

I have seen enough and read enough to not believe a 1/4 of what the government says.
 
Code said:
Alex Jones is a fucking moron.

you may be right..im not basing my doubts on anything he had to say really..i read a ton of other articles on it last night..they all have very good points .
 
NJjuice22 said:


if you read that link i posted also, it states the almost all of the fuel is contained in the thin aluminum wings of the airplane and upon impact most of it should have burned up , thats why there was a huge fireball, also like stated a kerosene fire (fuel) does not burn hot enough to melt steal, and if the steal began to melt it would have bent , the building would have leaned over and fell sideways not straight down .


very interesting.
 
Top Bottom