Evidence that the government is responsible for 9/11 twin towers (movie)

[The_Ghost]

Alex Jones is a fucking moron.

whether he is or isn't doesn't matter.

Its not like he is making up the stuff he is talking about or is the only one talking about it.

That is why if and I say IF this was true it would be easy to cover it up as no one would want to believe that this could happen.

 

[PIGEON-RAT]

well the day it happened you had all kinds of experts on tv saying that the buildings were design to collapse straight downward if they should ever need to fall

i'm no expert, so i don't know how true that is

but look at the footage. the buildings started to fall where the planes had hit. if it was an implosion you would've seen the whole thing going at once. the portions above the impact fell at an angle, not straight down. a controlled implosion would not have had so much debris moving out of the footprint of the building.

 

[Code]

Alex Jones is convinced of several things:
1.) The chinese are controlling the USA.
2.) There are lizards at the center of the Earth running the world.
3.) Everything that goes bad, is because the US wants to enslave it's citizens.

the china part confuses me too. why would we send that stuff to china?

 

[alien amp pharm]

The support columns were in the middle of the buildings. The outter was just a reinforcing shell. Columns subject to heat must be fire coated or they fail.

With the extreme high temperatures the columns substained due to the jet fuel they would've given away eventually no matter how protected (not to mention the possibility of the plane bending the columns on impact). Also due to the columns being in the interior of the building the collaspe would result in a vertical motion (straight down).

Note that it wasn't one floor falling on another, it was the floors all above the crash that came down. Therefore the floors below the crash had no chance of supporting the collapsing upper portions.

I work in structural engineering so I know a little bit.

 

[Code]

See, this is what happens when you ask, say educated people, as opposed to asking.. say, Alex Jones.

BTW, did you notice you initials match AAP's handle?

The support columns were in the middle of the buildings. The outter was just a reinforcing shell. Columns subject to heat must be fire coated or they fail.

With the extreme high temperatures the columns substained due to the jet fuel they would've given away eventually no matter how protected (not to mention the possibility of the plane bending the columns on impact). Also due to the columns being in the interior of the building the collaspe would result in a vertical motion (straight down).

Note that it wasn't one floor falling on another, it was the floors all above the crash that came down. Therefore the floors below the crash had no chance of supporting the collapsing upper portions.

I work in structural engineering so I know a little bit.

 

[The_Ghost]

See, this is what happens when you ask, say educated people, as opposed to asking.. say, Alex Jones.

BTW, did you notice you initials match AAP's handle?

In all situations not just this one you gotta look past the person.


Becuase Dan Rather is on huge Network and is well known does't mean everything that he says is the truth.


Wheather what the Jones guy says about 9/11 is true or not I don't know as I am not an expert.

But after what I saw on a Cdn doc the other day, there is no doubt in my mind that G.W. was bought and made by the arabs in the 80's, there are enough facts to prove this, just look for them.

 

[alien amp pharm]

BTW, did you notice you initials match AAP's handle?

Yeah, he digs me.
or do I dig him? I can't remember which.

 

[buddy28]

Better question is "is it impossible?"

Carefull. You're starting to sound like a believer.

My theory is shaky at best just asking if it is possible for the foundation to be harmed and if thatcould lead to the kind of collapse of the towers we saw. I don't think it oculd - because even if the foundation were shattered on impact, the towers would not have "imploded".

I know what you mean. I was just throwing out ideas too. Just running with yours.

I guess I am ignorantof this point - the wreackage was shipped to China? I remember the footage of the trucks and the workers but I don't remember it going to China.....

It looks like the bulk of the debris was shipped to asia and india according to this bbc article I found.

"Almost immediately after 11 September, New York authorities started looking for ways to deal with the 1.6 million tons of wreckage.

After investigators combed through it, extracting human remains and personal effects, more than 350,000 tons was sold for recycling in China, Malaysia, Korea and India"
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2611059.stm

 

[Code]

Newsflash Champ, ALL politicians in the Western Hemisphere (you slow folk to the North included) have Saudi money somewhere.

This is Alex Jones' official website....
http://www.infowars.com/

If anyone thrives on conspiracy and hyperbole, it's this dude.

In all situations not just this one you gotta look past the person.


Becuase Dan Rather is on huge Network and is well known does't mean everything that he says is the truth.


Wheather what the Jones guy says about 9/11 is true or not I don't know as I am not an expert.

But after what I saw on a Cdn doc the other day, there is no doubt in my mind that G.W. was bought and made by the arabs in the 80's, there are enough facts to prove this, just look for them.

 

[Forge]

The support columns were in the middle of the buildings. The outter was just a reinforcing shell. Columns subject to heat must be fire coated or they fail.

With the extreme high temperatures the columns substained due to the jet fuel they would've given away eventually no matter how protected (not to mention the possibility of the plane bending the columns on impact). Also due to the columns being in the interior of the building the collaspe would result in a vertical motion (straight down).

Note that it wasn't one floor falling on another, it was the floors all above the crash that came down. Therefore the floors below the crash had no chance of supporting the collapsing upper portions.

I work in structural engineering so I know a little bit.

Exactly. Once the upper floors started to fall, the lower floors provided absolutely no resistance at all against all of that weight. Remember that a building like the towers is mostly open space, not solid.