Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

EF social experiment.

superqt4u2nv

Elite
Elite Moderator
Moderator
Imagine yourself in a trolley car going down a track with 5 rail workers in front of you. The break on the trolley malfunctions you can't stop the trolley it going to crash into 5 people and kill them. But wait there is a second track with only one worked and you can pull the lever to jump to the track with the one worker on it which will kill just him.

What do you do it's a split second choice make it and provide reason for your answer.
 
switch the track and just hit 1 person. Because killing 1 person is a lot better than killing 5 lol

why is this even a question?
 
Cam I pick the five?
 
lets make this interesting....5 females vs 1 dood. Dood looks rich but the females are all hot and there's a chance u could get a blow-and-rim from two of em.
 
I hate everyone but SD in this thread you retards are screwing it up it's not a trick question you can't change shit make a choice now
 
I don't see the point...only an a-hole wouldn't switch.
 
Is this thread going anywhere?

Well in most social circles expect elite of course LOL most would opt to kill one to save 5.

No lets paint the picture a tad different there is no second track instead there is a bridge with a large fat man on it. You can reach up push him on to the track and kill him or you can kill the 5 workers. What would you do? And why?
 
Well in most social circles expect elite of course LOL most would opt to kill one to save 5.

No lets paint the picture a tad different there is no second track instead there is a bridge with a large fat man on it. You can reach up push him on to the track and kill him or you can kill the 5 workers. What would you do? And why?

And kill the fat guy cause fat people suck except certain fat chicks which are fun to bang but that's a whole nother scenario
 
Well in most social circles expect elite of course LOL most would opt to kill one to save 5.

No lets paint the picture a tad different there is no second track instead there is a bridge with a large fat man on it. You can reach up push him on to the track and kill him or you can kill the 5 workers. What would you do? And why?
*except
 
Imagine yourself in a trolley car going down a track with 5 rail workers in front of you. The break on the trolley malfunctions you can't stop the trolley it going to crash into 5 people and kill them. But wait there is a second track with only one worked and you can pull the lever to jump to the track with the one worker on it which will kill just him.

What do you do it's a split second choice make it and provide reason for your answer.
Leave it on the path its already on.. Who am I to choice life or death of another.
 
A decent amount of people have died on the train tracks here in Carlsbad, right in the touristy part of downtown, a block from the beach over the years. The cops were laying napkins and beach towels over body parts one time while people on beach cruisers and in-line skate did circles around them.
 
A decent amount of people have died on the train tracks here in Carlsbad, right in the touristy part of downtown, a block from the beach over the years. The cops were laying napkins and beach towels over body parts one time while people on beach cruisers and in-line skate did circles around them.

A Marine in SOI with my company a few years ago was walking with a group of other Marines in Oceanside and was hit by a ladder hanging off the side of the train. Can't remember if that idiot ever died or not.
 
A Marine in SOI with my company a few years ago was walking with a group of other Marines in Oceanside and was hit by a ladder hanging off the side of the train. Can't remember if that idiot ever died or not.

Yeah, the only trains we have around here are the sprinter which goes from the Oceanside pier east to Escondido and the Coaster which goes from downtown SD to OC/LA along the coastline. Both of them pass thru heavy traffic and foot traffic areas along the beach, so we see an occasional train related death.
 
Yeah, the only trains we have around here are the sprinter which goes from the Oceanside pier east to Escondido and the Coaster which goes from downtown SD to OC/LA along the coastline. Both of them pass thru heavy traffic and foot traffic areas along the beach, so we see an occasional train related death.

Two of us got sent to pick his family up from the LAX and escort them to their room in SD (not sure why the Corps didn't fly them there) where he was staying at Balboa. Odd little drive. Basically an hour of me trying to keep conversation casual and not laugh at how fucking stupid you'd have to be to get drunk and play chicken with a train.

I've ridden the one that takes you to the north county mall, not sure which that is. It fucking hauls ass. Every time I went to SD I used a shuttle or drove, so idk about that one
 
Leave it on the path its already on.. Who am I to choice life or death of another.

A reasonable opposing view thank you.

I hate all you people that are trying to change the situation it is what it is you only have those options.

First scenario a lot of people will say they would kill the one person but it seems hard to push the fat man no?

One death spares 5 what's the difference?
 
Obviously most would take the path of least distruction and use the track that would save the most lives. There aren't that many sick fucks that would rather watch 5 people die..

Well, except for needto...
 
Obviously most would take the path of least distruction and use the track that would save the most lives. There aren't that many sick fucks that would rather watch 5 people die..

Well, except for needto...

Ok your a dr you have five patients one needs a liver, one a heart, one a kidney, another bone marrow, last a gal bladder. With out these things they all die. You have another healthy patient happens to be a match to all of theses things. Do you kill him to save the others?

One dies but 5 live its the path of least destruction no?
 
Ok your a dr you have five patients one needs a liver, one a heart, one a kidney, another bone marrow, last a gal bladder. With out these things they all die. You have another healthy patient happens to be a match to all of theses things. Do you kill him to save the others?

One dies but 5 live its the path of least destruction no?

If that was the case the government could take any healthy person against their will, kill them, then distribute all their organs so that multiple others may life. But we dont do that because of human rights or civil rights infringement and the hippocratic oath. It is not the responsibility of the healthy to be sacrificed for the terminally ill, as the healthy did not cause the problems of the ill so they bear no punishment for them.
 
Imagine yourself in a trolley car going down a track with 5 rail workers in front of you. The break on the trolley malfunctions you can't stop the trolley it going to crash into 5 people and kill them. But wait there is a second track with only one worked and you can pull the lever to jump to the track with the one worker on it which will kill just him.

What do you do it's a split second choice make it and provide reason for your answer.

Not enough info - any lawyers or politicians involved?
 
If that was the case the government could take any healthy person against their will, kill them, then distribute all their organs so that multiple others may life. But we dont do that because of human rights or civil rights infringement and the hippocratic oath. It is not the responsibility of the healthy to be sacrificed for the terminally ill, as the healthy did not cause the problems of the ill so they bear no punishment for them.

sounds like obamacare

Sent from my SCH-I500 using EliteFitness
 
Whats the difference between all 3 deaths in the end one person is deciding the fate of another if you choose to kill the one guy what makes the Dr choice so much worse?
 
Obviously most would take the path of least distruction and use the track that would save the most lives. There aren't that many sick fucks that would rather watch 5 people die..

Well, except for needto...


Did the man standing by him self do anything to deserve his life being taken to save the other 5? NO he did not did he. Hell who knows just maybe that one man was famous Doctor/scientist who would have went on to find the cure for AIDS or something like that... Now what? you just sentenced millions to death for decades to come.. He has just as much of a right to live as the others do and I would not stand in as god or what ever and make the choice of taking his life over others.

I am not the universe, mother earth, god or Jesus. If faced with the choice to take one persons life to save others I would not choice because its not my choice to make . Unless its a personal act of heroism in which I am giving my own life to save the lives of others.

Now if I knew the people.. say I knew all 5 people and they were family members of mine.. Lets say they were my kids. Ya Id pull the switch and flip the track in a heart beat. I would only do so out of instant reaction though and the deep inner desire to protect the ones I love. :qt::qt:
 
Needto I was just fuckin with ya bro. I see what your point is, I am just saying that most people in that situation would probably be in panic mode and make the split second decision to be involved in the least horrific accident possible.

I don't think most people are going to be thinking too deeply into it in that panic moment, and would choose to spare 5 lives at the expense of one.
 
Ok your a dr you have five patients one needs a liver, one a heart, one a kidney, another bone marrow, last a gal bladder. With out these things they all die. You have another healthy patient happens to be a match to all of theses things. Do you kill him to save the others?

One dies but 5 live its the path of least destruction no?

Your arguement is flawed. One does not require a gallbladder.
 
All I see is an avi with nice big boobs. Is she saying something?


Sent from my iPhone using EliteFitness app
 
Imagine yourself in a trolley car going down a track with 5 rail workers in front of you. The break on the trolley malfunctions you can't stop the trolley it going to crash into 5 people and kill them. But wait there is a second track with only one worked and you can pull the lever to jump to the track with the one worker on it which will kill just him.

What do you do it's a split second choice make it and provide reason for your answer.

Why do these people not realize a trolley car is hurtling at them with no intention of stopping while the driver is sounding an alarm while at least some of the passengers are probably trying to get their attention?

Maybe killing the five and keeping them from reproducing would benefit humanity because they wouldn't pass on their defective "I can't hear or see a large object hurtling toward me while people are screaming a warning" gene?
:)
 
Top Bottom