bouncer
New member
I'm going to keep this simple and confine to recent event's, ie. in the last 18 months.
Ehud Barak was elected on the promise that he would finally bring about a settlement to the crisis in both Isreal and Lebanon. The young population of Isreal wanting peace voted for him.
Some of his election promises were the halt to building on arab territories, (limited) automony for the Palestininan population and the withdrawal of IDF forces from South Lebanon within 6 months of his election. This he done within 2 months, catching everyone by surprise. Lands were given back to the palestinians and building on already occupied lands was halted. The West Bank and Gaza were brought under the control of the Palestian authorities, ie everything was looking rosy in the garden !. Then Sharon visited the Temple Mound, something which is the right of both Jew, arab and Christian.
The result of that action was to start the present intifada.
Why the Palestianians read the situation so wrong ?. After continuous attacks on the Isreali state and peace talks breaking down with Barak who was still seeking a peacfull settlement the Isreali population was lead to beleive (by the opposition party) that Baraks governement was soft on the Palestian's, a vote of no confidence was brought by Sharon's party, a general election was called which he lost. Sharon was voted in, an intifada was declared and the rest as they say is history.
So do the Palo's deserve to lay in the nest the feathered ?.
Bouncer
Ehud Barak was elected on the promise that he would finally bring about a settlement to the crisis in both Isreal and Lebanon. The young population of Isreal wanting peace voted for him.
Some of his election promises were the halt to building on arab territories, (limited) automony for the Palestininan population and the withdrawal of IDF forces from South Lebanon within 6 months of his election. This he done within 2 months, catching everyone by surprise. Lands were given back to the palestinians and building on already occupied lands was halted. The West Bank and Gaza were brought under the control of the Palestian authorities, ie everything was looking rosy in the garden !. Then Sharon visited the Temple Mound, something which is the right of both Jew, arab and Christian.
The result of that action was to start the present intifada.
Why the Palestianians read the situation so wrong ?. After continuous attacks on the Isreali state and peace talks breaking down with Barak who was still seeking a peacfull settlement the Isreali population was lead to beleive (by the opposition party) that Baraks governement was soft on the Palestian's, a vote of no confidence was brought by Sharon's party, a general election was called which he lost. Sharon was voted in, an intifada was declared and the rest as they say is history.
So do the Palo's deserve to lay in the nest the feathered ?.
Bouncer