Shit, I'm still recovering from yesterday's monkeyfuck.
Let me say this right from the start. This debate requires A LOT of understanding. People see a cut and paste study and they immediately think "Ooh! Proof!" Well, it is not. You have to study the studies. But when people ignore the analysis and just keep jamming the same erroneous points up everyone's ass, that's when I get frustrated and things get heated.
So here goes my simplified explanation.
First of all, I did not see anywhere in that study where the patients levels remained elevated. Where's that? (So right from the beginning, we have miscommunication. See how these things go?)
Please read the result and conclusion of the study below. It clearly spells out for you that this patients T levels were restored.
I know you're going to say, "restored to what" but again, I think it is safe to assume that the patients levels were restored from close to nothing, to something within the "normal" range.
Okay, a few quick points...
Why are these studies always done on one person? Any legit stufy would include hundreds at a time.
You of all people know this will never happen. Universities are not going to spend millions of dollars studying post cycle therapy for steroid users. At best we are lucky to have a handful of studies illustrating the effectiveness of clomid on reintroducing GnRH output. However, this particular study was done on a steroid user for the exact purpose of recovery.
What was the person's history? It often has nothing to do with men who are suppressed from steroid use.
Actually, this study was done on a man suppressed from steroid use.
The treatment usually lasts for several months. Can you imagine the effect that a 4-6 month course of Clomid would have on some people?
This treatment lasted 2 months.
You also claim it mentioned the before and after numbers. Where? They weren't on the studies posted. I've never seen a case where T was recovered and remained elevated. Never. NEVER. And I've been at this for over 15 years.
The study explains that the man recovered. In other words, his test levels remained elevated. It's right there in your face. If his number was 70 at the start, and 400 after the therapy, you would be like "oh that isn't high enough he did not recover." In reality, most men DON'T have testosterone at the upper quadrant of the range. That is why there are ranges.
Now, you may have something that shows numbers, but if they're being respresented incorrectly, then we're back to this whole back and forth explanation/argument.
Why and how could these numbers be represented incorrectly? There was a clear objective to the study, done by trained professionals associated with a medical university that has published hundreds of studies in other fields of medicine. If something was flawed, the study would have never made it into this medical journal.
Let me just say that I've read dozens of these things. There's always something flawed in the conclusions. Now I have nothing to gain from that. I WISH Clomid worked for me. When I used it I was a fucking MESS. THAT, is what started my whole search for an alternative. it's not like I bought some shit and decided to sell it and decided to stop people from buying Clomid. That's dumb and insulting. This is my life's work and it's serious.
Maybe that is why you have such an aggressive stance against it. Because it didn't work for YOU.
As far as Clomid being a form of TRT, that's just absurd. It has far too many toxicity issues.
Now...for the last time. Some people find that Clomid works for them. Great. Using supps can only help. But I want to help people avoid what I, and many others have experienced from clomid and nolva use. Weakness, loss of libido, loss of gains, foul mood, lethargy, weepiness, vision problems and impotence.
AND on top of it, the recovery effects are dubious. Even Dan Duchaine -- the guy all these internet guru's are essentially copying, admitting nolva was a shitty drug.
Now that there are better alternatives, why use it? A lot of people are seeing that and appreciating it. But to others, they just want to piss on it. And of course, they've never even tried the supps. That's ALWAYS the case.
That is fine. If your product is a better alternative, then everyone should use them. However, the argument got out of hand because you insisted that the effectiveness of clomid was a myth and could not raise T. Even when there are plenty of studies that show it can.
And that's that. I really don't want to discuss it any further.