Any threads about the Bombings in England yet?

[needtogetaas]

I sure am glad Bush decided for us to wage war in iraq and make all the bad people follow us there to fight and stuff.

Were you close to any of them Tuc?

me to.............................

 

[75th]

Wrong...I just tend to start scrolling past posts and losing interest REAL fast when IGNORANT comments like I am against Ameirca and dipshit come into play...not saying you do this at all.

I basically said what I thought in a nut shell and it seems like I keep repeating myself. Time will tell I guess....and I hope you are right...believe me I do....

I wont be attacked because I question what this country is doing and the kind of situations are armed forces are sent into...NOT QUESTONING IS SCARY.

I've never said I was anti-war or for just letting terrorists hang out and do what they want but when over a hundred thousand innocent people are dying MAYBE YOUR PLAN WAS KIND OF BAD!


I dont exacty see a RUSH of people running to join the Armed Forces and protect this country either....why is that? SCARY!

I didnt say anything of the sort. I simply asked what YOU believe would be/have been a good way to go about this.

And also, explain how you think our government has been ineffective at preventing terrorism when so far we are (on average) on track to have 2 terrorist attacks against the US this entire decade, when last decade we had 12.

 

[DJ_UFO]

i didnt say im an expert on anything (except drugs, cause i am ) but i like to think i possess a good deal of common sense, but there isnt much i can do with a bunch of clowns who want to get on their soapbox, declare "terrorists hate us, because they do" (as if that is some sort of logical explanation, rather than an empty, circum verbose statement) and have the gall (or the idiocy, and i suspect the latter) to become sarcastic in the face of solid evidence from an american associate professor who specialises in just this field!

sorry mate but youre an intellectual write off. youre so used to believing something that you refuse to reassess it, even in the face of unbiased evidence from someone on your side, and i refuse to argue with people like that, because it just becomes a bitching session.

i cant explain to a blind man what the color blue is, and similarly, i cannot get you to conceptualise some fairly simple ideas, because its beyond you. i could sit here and laugh at your shallow intellect, but its not a nice thing to do.

Who told you that you possess common sense idiot?
It's the same philosophy you use to claim that you "look good, real good"? So now anyone who hates US and defend "terrorist's rights" is in the "right humanitarian position" Gimme a break! Somebody please ban this little piece of shit!

 

[CFZB]

Ill Im saying is I sure am glad Bush has such resolve to carry such a finely crafted plan to its completion.

 

[AristotleBC]

edited

 

[starfish]

Ill Im saying is I sure am glad Bush has such resolve to carry such a finely crafted plan to its completion.

It's really comforting when soldiers think they are just pawns for Bushie...


"A good soldier is one who is politically neutral and accepts whatever the commanding officers and Commander in Chief designates. I hate Bush and I’m sick of the bureaucracy of the Army so I don’t think I’ll re-enlist in 2005 and if they try to call me back up I’m pretty much in the conscientious objector category now. I’d like to make a difference on the civilian side from now on. I’m proud that I was able to get rid of Saddam so that Iraqis could choose their own destiny but on the other hand I don’t like being a pawn in the hands of somebody like George W. Bush."....credit to asoldiersview

 

[75th]

It's really comforting when soldiers think they are just pawns for Bushie...


"A good soldier is one who is politically neutral and accepts whatever the commanding officers and Commander in Chief designates. I hate Bush and I’m sick of the bureaucracy of the Army so I don’t think I’ll re-enlist in 2005 and if they try to call me back up I’m pretty much in the conscientious objector category now. I’d like to make a difference on the civilian side from now on. I’m proud that I was able to get rid of Saddam so that Iraqis could choose their own destiny but on the other hand I don’t like being a pawn in the hands of somebody like George W. Bush."

I didnt say anything of the sort. I simply asked what YOU believe would be/have been a good way to go about this.

And also, explain how you think our government has been ineffective at preventing terrorism when so far we are (on average) on track to have 2 terrorist attacks against the US this entire decade, when last decade we had 12.

 

[CFZB]

I thought there was already "Increased Security".

http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/07/07/cities.security/index.html

 

[starfish]

I would not have sent soldiers to die for zeroweapons of destruction that's for damn sure. Yeah...we really needed protection from that!!!

I never claimed to know the answers....BUT THAT IS SCREWED UP!!


YOURSELF!

 

[CFZB]

I would not have sent soldiers to die for zeroweapons of destruction that's for damn sure. Yeah...we really needed protection from that!!!

I never claimed to know the answers....BUT THAT IS SCREWED UP!!


YOURSELF!

Dont even waste the Emotion on that Fool.