Any threads about the Bombings in England yet?

[Gambino]

I would not have sent soldiers to die for zeroweapons of destruction that's for damn sure. Yeah...we really needed protection from that!!!

I never claimed to know the answers....BUT THAT IS SCREWED UP!!


YOURSELF!

gutdamn stfu already

 

[75th]

I would not have sent soldiers to die for zeroweapons of destruction that's for damn sure. Yeah...we really needed protection from that!!!

I never claimed to know the answers....BUT THAT IS SCREWED UP!!


YOURSELF!

So, in other words you are quick to criticize the decisions of others when you in fact could not come up with something better.

Besides, aside from you not knowing anything about anything (which has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt by your emotionally charged "reply), what say you about the fact that in this decade we have had 1 terrorist attack against our country, when this time last decade we had 6? Doesnt that denote increased security, ESPECIALLY if (according to you) the only thing our leaders have done over the past 3 years is get more people pissed at us?

 

[wootoom]

so sad

 

[75th]

Dont even waste the Emotion on that Fool.

You know you have no argument whatsoever. Puberty is a tough time, but try to not take it out on us by interrupting our intelligent conversation (or, our one-sided owning session).

Or you can reply using one of your three methods:

1) Posting a link to an altered photo
2) Sending someone bad karma and/or bombing them
3) Making a single snide remark about Bush and/or our soldiers.

 

[CFZB]

 

[CFZB]

 

[CFZB]

The Internets is what it is ,74th and a Half.

It is sad.Sooo very Sad.

 

[GoldenDelicious]

75th i dont selectively skip your posts, just for you ill go back. fat bastard.

djufo: damn str8 i look good. very good. mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm goood

 

[pintoca]

lol @ this thread...

it reminds me why I stopped posting on political threads a while ago...

BTW, I thought it was about London when I clicked on it today... (it was subscribed from the day of the bombing)

 

[WODIN]

So, in other words you are quick to criticize the decisions of others when you in fact could not come up with something better.

Besides, aside from you not knowing anything about anything (which has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt by your emotionally charged "reply), what say you about the fact that in this decade we have had 1 terrorist attack against our country, when this time last decade we had 6? Doesnt that denote increased security, ESPECIALLY if (according to you) the only thing our leaders have done over the past 3 years is get more people pissed at us?

I think that you will find that those of us who disagreed with the invasion of Iraq were fully behind the war in Afghanistan and the removal of the Taliban. Further more once this was done had the administration brought about the full effort of the forces wasted in Iraq in getting OBL in Afghanistan I think we would have seen a quick end to that war and a serious blow to the efforts of terrorist around the world.

OBL is a figure head, motivator and a great coordinator of various groups. Much like any group that acts in unision if you remove the head the group tends to die. This hasn't happened and there has been a huge waste of life, time, effort and money in Iraq.

Iraq was already boxed in and Sadam was no real threat to anyone.

The only people that have truley benefited from the removal of Sadam have been the Iranian conservative mulahs in maintaining power over there country.