There is some history to the 5x5 and this board.
It's been popularized here due to overwhelming support that it works. It's almost the antithesis of the hype one reads in mags, supp ads, etc. Your post sounds as though you are referring to this program as another "brick in the wall" (sorry for the melodramatic reference) in terms of bogus claims. You imply that you know another routine that's better/comparable. While I'm not so shortsighted as to say that would be impossible, I would suspect it rather unlikely. If I read it wrong then I'm sorry, but that's what it looks like to me.
Your numerous AAS references show that you haven't read much on the 5x5 (not here anyway) b/c the guy who we credit for popularizing this program has made it clear that part of his motivation in doing so was the startling number of people who plateau due to shitty programs and minimal solid training info and subsequently use AAS. So your anti-steroid comments are preaching to the choir.
That's why newbs should read- you need a frame of reference for where the board in general is at.
And me and steroids? I haven't poked since feb. Since that time I've actually improved (or at minimum equalled) my "assisted" strength simply by learning and applying the stuff I've learned. Here's a journal of how my first 5x5 went (it's different than the one Ellinghad is using- I'd be happy to explain the diff. or link the articles that explain dual-factor theory if you're not already familiar with it):
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showthread.php?t=399754
This post is the cliff ntoes version I guess

:
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=5071295&postcount=90