Ron Paul wins Maine. delegate race far closer than media says

[mrplunkey]

that's still not 1/1000th as jesusy as Santorum who has openly stated he disapproves of what he considers "deviant" sexual practices even between heterosexual couples and thinks society has a moral obligation to police our bedrooms. Now that's beyond Jesusy cause i'm not even sure Jesus would have a problem with a married couple bringing each other off orally. But Santorum sure has a problem with it. We're back to this Augustine doctrine issue aren't we? Go do your research on Santorum before your fingers type out more nonsense along the lines of Ron Paul being more "jesusy" than Rick Santorum. Give your prefontal cortex a sporting chance already

This is gonna be another one of those situations where you talk yourself into a corner. It reminds me of how we got 400% efficient turbines which is now the stuff of EF legend.

Let's try a little thought experiment. Imagine 1,000 situations where someone's actions could be influenced by Christian doctrine.

Now let's test your boy Ron Paul first. How will he answer? That one is easy:

“I have accepted Jesus Christ as my personal Savior, and I endeavor every day to follow Him in all I do and in every position I advocate.”

So that would be 1,000 out of 1,000 -- a perfect score!

Now let's do Santorium. How will he answer? Well that one simply doesn't matter. The maximum he can answer Jesusy is 1,000.

So what's the best he can do? Tie.

But I do concede I enjoy being entertained by people who don't understand logic and mathematics.

 

[redsamurai]

So it's a tie in your eyes? really? And that was ur highly touted logic sample? anybody can google this so i'm not going to argue, Ron Paul is a 100th of the social engineering right wing whack hat that Rick Santorum is. Ron Paul says he accepts jesus as his lord and savior...find me where he has said he espouses "MORE" govt in our private lives the way Rick Santorum has. You can't find it so don't bother. You started off in this thread with some semblance of a real argument that RP is perhaps more socially conservative then most people recognize....but now ur just dipping into absurd hyperbole which is where you always go because you are weak.

 

[mrplunkey]

So it's a tie in your eyes? really? And that was ur highly touted logic sample? anybody can google this so i'm not going to argue, Ron Paul is a 100th of the social engineering right wing whack hat that Rick Santorum is. Ron Paul says he accepts jesus as his lord and savior...find me where he has said he espouses "MORE" govt in our private lives the way Rick Santorum has. You can't find it so don't bother. You started off in this thread with some semblance of a real argument that RP is perhaps more socially conservative then most people recognize....but now ur just dipping into absurd hyperbole which is where you always go because you are weak.

I love watching the hypocrisy of a libtard supporting a hyper-conservative, super-jesusy candidate whose views just aren't that different from others among the conservative right.

Let's get real here for a second. Ron Paul appeals to true libertarians, a lot of the tin foil hat crowd, many social conservatives and a streak of hipster 20-somethings who want to be off the beaten path.

Now let's sort through the facts: You aren't one of those 20-something hipsters anymore. You're a creepy 30-something guy who lingers around school because he's unemployable. And guess what? You weren't one of those cool kids when you were in your 20's either. You were creepy then too. So what does your future look like? I'll tell you. It's bouncing from physical fitness board-to-board making retarded statements and playing e-knight to a bunch of wimminz who will e-reject you online as much as they do IRL. You can look forward to perpetual unemployment, endless appeals for more government assistance, perpetual paid-unpaid killer hay bailing internships, and social rejection for all the days of your life.

HTH!

 

[redsamurai]

just went to his website, perchance where did you find this Biblical based demand for honest weights and measures? I didn't see anything like that. What i saw was a call to end the fed. Yes I saw his stance on abortion and I don't agree with it...but it's pretty much the only thing i don't agree with him on. ALthough it sounds like he'd push the issue to states rights. Something I wouldn't terribly like but i would abide by. Sooooo....what was ur point again? Oh you wanna now call me creepy e-knight something or other? haha do a crane kick for me danielson and don't forget the green belt or else.

 

[mrplunkey]

just went to his website, perchance where did you find this Biblical based demand for honest weights and measures? I didn't see anything like that. What i saw was a call to end the fed. Yes I saw his stance on abortion and I don't agree with it...but it's pretty much the only thing i don't agree with him on. ALthough it sounds like he'd push the issue to states rights. Something I wouldn't terribly like but i would abide by. Sooooo....what was ur point again? Oh you wanna now call me creepy e-knight something or other? haha do a crane kick for me danielson and don't forget the green belt or else.

Let me google that for you

 

[mrplunkey]

And just in case you can't click the first hit that google search gives you, it was cleverly hidden on his campaign website.

Who would have thought to go there to find his views?

 

[redsamurai]

ahhh, context...you know how to spell it Brian right?


The full quote:

We must follow the Biblical mandate of using honest weights and measures – not printing money out of thin air in almost complete secrecy and then handing it over to oppressive dictators.



Ron is clear about his views that we need to go back to some sort of solid backing of the money supply, this does not mean going back to stacking hard currency on a scale for every purchase. But it sounds that way when you don't PROVIDE THE FULL FUCKING QUOTE green belt.

 

[mrplunkey]

ahhh, context...you know how to spell it Brian right?


The full quote:

We must follow the Biblical mandate of using honest weights and measures – not printing money out of thin air in almost complete secrecy and then handing it over to oppressive dictators.



Ron is clear about his views that we need to go back to some sort of solid backing of the money supply, this does not mean going back to stacking hard currency on a scale for every purchase. But it sounds that way when you don't PROVIDE THE FULL FUCKING QUOTE green belt.

You fucking retard. He plastered the word BIBLICAL right in the middle of it.

It's odd how selective your reading is...

 

[redsamurai]

context monkey, context.

 

[the.gladiator1987]

plunk you sound retarded about this...you are over exaggerating Ron Paul mentioning the Bible. Who cares if it says Bible in the quote....the Bible also says to love one another, is that not right since it is in the Bible? How about not to lie or steal, are those not ok since it was mentioned in the Bible? I agree with abortion, how would you have liked if your mom aborted you, low life fag. Santorum is way more jesusy, and then he endorses Romney lol what a fuckin mess. Ron Paul cares about our debt, cares about life, cares about our freedom, people who dont see that are stupid as shit. I may be wrong about a lot of shit on here but Ron Paul is def not one of them. Ron Pauls point is that our monetary system is fucked up. Plunk have you read the report from the partial audit of the Fed?