needtogetaas
New member
redguru said:Whether it was you or not is moot, needto. My objection still remains the same. If posts critical of sponsors' products are recycled then it smacks of favoritism no matter which mod or admin does it. I for one, have nothing against dermacrine sustain or any of PP's products.
_________________________________________________________________
redguru said:Even if it was cut&pasted from another board (who's motivation may be suspect), the point of the study is still valid. It contradicted PP's claims and I would have liked to have seen his response rather than have it quickly recycled. PP's a smart guy and I am sure he could have come up with a well-reasoned response to the claim. By sweeping it under the rug it smacks of favoritism. Which is something one of the mods was cautioned about before he accepted the position.
patsfan1379 said:I'd say mods hawking sponsors products is pretty biased. LOL.
Your response
_________________________________________________________________redguru said:Then deleting posts that provide peer-reviewed research contradicting claims by the said sponsor.
hmmmm Just a bit of backpedaling I see. Ill give you that it might have been one of your objections but it was clearly not you or some other members only objection. A simple "I am sorry needto" will do bro, you don't have to grovel. I don't expect any such behaver from you though. I'll just say this. Get your game together better next time. I work hard at every thing I do. I work hard to be a good mod,a good sponsor rep, a good member, and a good friend/helper to every member I can.I do my best to seperate each role I have here on ef. I may not be perfect but I give it my all. I have lots to learn but I am willing and able to do so. So please stop attacking me. I don't do it to you.
Last edited: