Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
would you hit this?
- Thread starter binö
- Start date
I'm knot seeing an bulging set of nuts ... so no
...
PICK3
New member
settle down
empirebuilder
New member
Isnt that Kanyes girl?
empirebuilder
New member
But yes I would definitely hit that haha!
meh, body is 100% perfect
Love the butchie do, and agreed that body is retarded. If she's dim enough to really be with that knucklehead though, she's contaminated with The Stupid.
+1
^^^ This made me LOL
digimon7068
New member
she has a great body and a pretty face. . .would i hit it? yes. but, honestly? i like hair. . .i'm a big fan. . .especially long ringlet curls. . .that fall all around your face. . .when she's on top and leans over to kiss you. . .yeah. . .that works. . .
Yes. Amber Rose, she's a model, half Italian.
mrplunkey
New member
Good Lord guys, are you serious? That's just gross.
Do you realize what a mess of cottage cheese cellulite is under that dress? In doggie position, her shit is gonna be wobbling all over the place. If you can't slap that ass and it snap right back into position, you might as well just go fuck a tub of gelatin.
Rule #1: Girls that look skinny in clothes look great naked.
Rule #2: Boobs and bellies come and go, but bitchy lasts forever.
Learn it, live it, love it.
Do you realize what a mess of cottage cheese cellulite is under that dress? In doggie position, her shit is gonna be wobbling all over the place. If you can't slap that ass and it snap right back into position, you might as well just go fuck a tub of gelatin.
Rule #1: Girls that look skinny in clothes look great naked.
Rule #2: Boobs and bellies come and go, but bitchy lasts forever.
Learn it, live it, love it.
oh oh quick, hide your post from Dialtone!
disagree bro, she looks fit and healthy thick to me.
you must like the coked out boney cadaver model look?
to each his own (fail!)
To each his own, one man's meat, etc. Anyway, if you do a Google image search on her there are plenty of pics with her in various states of undress.
She looks like she has a nice healthy shaped body. Certainly much nicer than many runway models, who may be skinny but are refered to as "skinny fat." Frankly, I kind of like the hair, too, particularly when she lets it grow out just a little bit and dyes it.
Mitch in 3.. 2..
KillahBee
New member
good. you keep all the sticks and I'll take amazingly sexy women like this for myself.
it's funny, cause if I don't see anything wobble when i'm behind a girl, i ain't happy.
nasty, i dont like it. she could lose 10lbs, i wouldnt say 10lbs off her would get her to "coked out" look
Anyway the hair? what hair, shes ugly.
Anyway the hair? what hair, shes ugly.
digimon7068
New member
meh. . .at 5'6", my wife weighs a whopping 110lbs (sometimes a little more, sometimes a little less). . .but, as long as a girl had a pretty face, i was never afraid of a little meat on the bones (or on my bone
).
mrplunkey
New member
Nope -- I like the curves, but I don't like the wobble and worble that comes with a thick layer of fat.
i just can't fathom how one can look at those pics and think
fat or nasty...if i didn't respect you your str8 credentials i'd
be suspect (
)
mrplunkey
New member
I think the runway models are waaaaay too skinny as well.
But what's wrong with this chicka?
See? She's got curves but wouldn't jiggle up and down while you hit it.
KillahBee
New member
I think the runway models are waaaaay too skinny as well.
But what's wrong with this chicka?
See? She's got curves but wouldn't jiggle up and down while you hit it.
a) i wouldn't categorize marissa miller as having "curves". sure she's less skeleton-like than a lot of models but definitely not "curvy"
b) so you want an ass that doesn't move when you slap it? that shit sounds boring, son
Plunk, any girl I can wrap my hand around her upper arm and overlap my thumb and middle finger needs a little muscle on her frame IMO
Gotta love these little girls that you put a 2 lb. dumbbell in each hand and they shake with lifting the weight
hey musclemom!not spoke to you in liek a year lolol
how are you?
You're silly.
why? lol
mrplunkey
New member
Plunk, any girl I can wrap my hand around her upper arm and overlap my thumb and middle finger needs a little muscle on her frame IMO
Gotta love these little girls that you put a 2 lb. dumbbell in each hand and they shake with lifting the weight
See? That's another common misconception. The girl in that picture is about 5'7" or 5'8". When she's not skinnied-up for a photoshoot, she's probably carrying an extra 10-12ish lbs. That's enough body weight to move a decent pink dumbell.
So imagine what happens: With those additional 10 pounds, all she loses is a little definition in her stomach, her boobs swell a little and her ass gets just a tad "poochey". So if anything, she just goes from skinny hot to normal hot. I can live with either.
devil deezy
New member
yes id hit it... body is to nice toi pass up
mrplunkey
New member
i just can't fathom how one can look at those pics and think
fat or nasty...if i didn't respect you your str8 credentials i'd
be suspect (
Look at her ass one more time. Are you trying to convince yourself that's all muscle? Do the math -- she'd have to squat 900lbs.
Even though she's still relatively young and her skin is still relatively firm, there's a solid 3"+ of pure fat between her skin and any real muscle she has. That's just gross. And imagine her in doggie position -- you know that belly roll she has is going to all ball-up and into a sagging fat pad that sways back and forth as you hit it.
And skinny girls seem to have tons more energy in the sack too... but that's an entirely separate issue.
slimjim1985
New member
considering this isn't some cruel joke and she really is a female with no male reproductive organs. then Hella yes
mrplunkey
New member
Then why do you have a skinny chick in your avatar? I'd think the body in your avi >>>> some thick chicka
slimjim1985
New member
believe me, I love me skinny fit women. Everyonce in awhile I like me some curves. no fatties by anymeans, but give me a girl with a fat ass and i'll fall in
devil deezy
New member
ehh fuck it... let it ride... id hit it doggie with a big smile on my face
Alpha-Male
New member
No. It would just feel too fucking weird. Esp. since I only find long haired birds attractive - at least shoulder length.
redshirt27se
New member
I'd do it.
Last I checked I'd be smashing her vadge, not her scalp.
Last I checked I'd be smashing her vadge, not her scalp.
Plunk, supermodels these days are required to be a size 0 to 2. Are you sure you you really have some idea how tiny framed a size 0 to 2, 5'7" woman is? Because I do.
But to give you some idea, I'm a 5'9" woman with a large frame, the skinniest I've ever been in my entire LIFE, with anorexia in full swing, was a size 10. To get any smaller I'd have had to virtually amputate bone.
There used to be a woman on here who had a sig that read "Pink weights or big plates, which are you?"
I'm a woman that likes being able to pick up my own 40 lb. boxes of kitty litter, thank you very much, and osteoporosis is one thing I won't have to worry about down the road.
mrplunkey
New member
My gf is 5'7" and runs size 2 with a size 0 in some brands. What she calls her "skinny" weight is 121lbs (and she looks a little too skinny then) and her more normal weight is 125-128lbs.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with having a thicker frame and needing a larger size either. But let's get back to the girl in the original post. Just exactly how is she only "big boned"? Look at her legs -- are her femurs 5" in diameter?
We need a reality check on that girl:
1) She's "all muscle" so she must be a 900lb squatter
or
2) She's "big boned" and has femurs that are 5" across
or the real issue...
3) She's got a thick (but relatively firm) layer of fat on her legs that's at least 3" thick.
I'm waiting on the next theory. Perhaps her veins, arteries and nerve bundles are just all 2" across each. Maybe she's just "big veined".
This is a matter of aesthetic opinion. The original girl pictured, IMO, is sexier than the one you pictured and given the choice of which body I would prefer to be or be with, that's the one I'd pick. I've never found the waife look appealing. Additionally, the supermodel look is not achievable for the majority of women, and sets unrealistic standards for young women. It's tatamount to expecting all men to be built like Arnold or Ronnie.My gf is 5'7" and runs size 2 with a size 0 in some brands. What she calls her "skinny" weight is 121lbs (and she looks a little too skinny then) and her more normal weight is 125-128lbs.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with having a thicker frame and needing a larger size either. But let's get back to the girl in the original post. Just exactly how is she only "big boned"? Look at her legs -- are her femurs 5" in diameter?
We need a reality check on that girl:
1) She's "all muscle" so she must be a 900lb squatter
or
2) She's "big boned" and has femurs that are 5" across
or the real issue...
3) She's got a thick (but relatively firm) layer of fat on her legs that's at least 3" thick.
I'm waiting on the next theory. Perhaps her veins, arteries and nerve bundles are just all 2" across each. Maybe she's just "big veined".
You prefer a petite woman, surprise, so do most men
20+ years ago, when I would go out with my girlfriends, we would make bets who would get hit on first and most. None of us was overweight, were all pretty easy on the eyes, but I was the only one who was taller than most guys when I wore heels. They got hit on much more often and by the TALLER guys. Average height to short guys came after me. That was when I developed my theory: Tall dudes are not attracted to tall chicks. Whether it's to keep the species around a standard size, whether it makes them look bigger, I don't frigging know, it is what it is My ex husband and I were anomalies, he was 6'5". However, my current husband and I are almost exactly the same height.
For the record, this is my idea of a nearly perfect female body:
billfred
New member
1) yes I would hit it
2) Yeah.. I would hit most anything really. Life is about collecting different taste and experiences especially when it comes to the womenz
3) Lol at Plunky thinking he would have an option to hit that or the model he posted
4) MM post more pics of that chick you like!!
2) Yeah.. I would hit most anything really. Life is about collecting different taste and experiences especially when it comes to the womenz
3) Lol at Plunky thinking he would have an option to hit that or the model he posted
4) MM post more pics of that chick you like!!
It's Sharon Bruneau, female bodybuilder from the 1990s. She usually placed, but only won twice, in 1991.
My gf is 5'7" and runs size 2 with a size 0 in some brands. What she calls her "skinny" weight is 121lbs (and she looks a little too skinny then) and her more normal weight is 125-128lbs.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with having a thicker frame and needing a larger size either. But let's get back to the girl in the original post. Just exactly how is she only "big boned"? Look at her legs -- are her femurs 5" in diameter?
We need a reality check on that girl:
1) She's "all muscle" so she must be a 900lb squatter
or
2) She's "big boned" and has femurs that are 5" across
or the real issue...
3) She's got a thick (but relatively firm) layer of fat on her legs that's at least 3" thick.
I'm waiting on the next theory. Perhaps her veins, arteries and nerve bundles are just all 2" across each. Maybe she's just "big veined".
Fine. Fuck skinny broads already.
Would ya'll quit debating your chick preferences already.
digimon7068
New member
sexy -
sexy -
sexy -
sexy -
sexy -
sexy -
sexy -
sexy -
sexy -
sexy -
sexy -
sexy -
sexy -
sexy women come in all shapes and sizes, yes??
mrplunkey
New member
This is a matter of aesthetic opinion. The original girl pictured, IMO, is sexier than the one you pictured and given the choice of which body I would prefer to be or be with, that's the one I'd pick. I've never found the waife look appealing. Additionally, the supermodel look is not achievable for the majority of women, and sets unrealistic standards for young women. It's tatamount to expecting all men to be built like Arnold or Ronnie.
You prefer a petite woman, surprise, so do most men
My ex husband and I were anomalies, he was 6'5". However, my current husband and I are almost exactly the same height.
For the record, this is my idea of a nearly perfect female body:
That bodybuilder in your picture is just a little too manly for my tastes. For girls, curves are great and a little definition just makes a great thing greater -- but anything can be taken too far.
Being an old fart, I've witnessed the transition from the old days of skinny chicks like Farah Fawcett, Susan Anton and Sheryl Tiegs to the contemporary sex symbols like J-Lo and Kim Kardashian. People always point to skinnier girls driving eating disorders in women, but imagine how many seriously overweight girls are running around claiming: "I'm not fat, I just have a J-Lo booty".
Both underweight and overweight conditions are obviously a problem, but look at the relative incidence of either -- fat is winning. And what's sadder is when I go over to the Univ. of Tenn. That's where you'll see hundreds (if not thousands) of 18-22 year old girls who are clearly in the prime of their lives running around with so much extra weight. So gone are the days of the "Freshman 5" -- we've entered the era of the "Freshman 40".
Anyway, I'll get off my soapbox. It would just be nice to see more middle-of-the-road physiques being celebrated and this current trend toward "thick" girls may be even more problematic than yesterday's skinny craze.
digimon7068
New member
rachel ray? she's cute and smart and funny and bubbly and sassy and i'll bet she could turn a man into a sweaty, panting, mess LOL. . .her body isn't "SI swimsuit" material but, that don't confront me none. . .i likes duh wimminz
Yeah digi slammed that one home!
digimon7068
New member
Similar threads
