Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Why do some people take Internet seriously?

I am not stating anyone ....is just a general question so dont be tripping. :rolleyes:




yet this picture below might give an explanation:



th_computerlove.jpg
 
computer%20jokes%20-%20beyond%20the%20internet.gif
 
Knock it the fuck off with the :rolledeyes: smilie, you overuse it making it pointless, seriously dont be that much of a tard, we really dont want to hate you :rolleyes:
 
exotic_island_girl said:
I am not stating anyone ....is just a general question so dont be tripping. :rolleyes:




yet this picture below might give an explanation:



th_computerlove.jpg

Because of those tits!
 
EIG for Elite Mod!
 
needtogetas said:
e.i.g is real people.I have banged her a few times,and I can say she is real.real good.




You promise me you would keep it a secret.


How dare you mister.




How's angel by the way did she enjoy it the last time I was there....


threesome is so fun.. I am such a slut!


;)
 
If a guy is in love with a dog would you judge him any different if the dog was male? Would that somehow make it worse?

When I eat carrots my throat gets itchy.
 
exotic_island_girl said:
You promise me you would keep it a secret.


How dare you mister.




How's angel by the way did she enjoy it the last time I was there....


threesome is so fun.. I am such a slut!


;)
she is grate but she missis you . :evil:
 
redguru said:
If a guy is in love with a dog would you judge him any different if the dog was male? Would that somehow make it worse?

When I eat carrots my throat gets itchy.


My guinea pig used to devour carrots. He loved them.



:cow:
 
I go to a south american restaurant and if you call 2 days ahead they'll make a guinea pig dinner. It's expensive though and I'm not that brave.
 
Raina said:
If a guy is in love with a dog would you judge him any different if the dog was male? Would that somehow make it worse?

When I eat carrots my throat gets itchy.

A dog is a dog. Although the dog might be a little more upset.

Ricola!
 
Raina said:
If a guy is in love with a dog would you judge him any different if the dog was male? Would that somehow make it worse?

When I eat carrots my throat gets itchy.


Right, a sliding scale of ethics and morality of a young person who has not fully developed personal constructs. Research says that occurs by about, on average of 25 y o. The ability to discern what is right and wrong is a strong factor determination on the person's mental health and wellbeing as well as many other indicators of mental stability.
The ability to say this is right and this is wrong that still asks questions means that she must get pregnant to have a male child to get the penis she so much envies and to resolve the phallic conflict within her.
See Penis Envy on Google
 
BrothaBill said:
Right, a sliding scale of ethics and morality of a young person who has not fully developed personal constructs. Research says that occurs by about, on average of 25 y o. The ability to discern what is right and wrong is a strong factor determination on the person's mental health and wellbeing as well as many other indicators of mental stability.
The ability to say this is right and this is wrong that still asks questions means that she must get pregnant to have a male child to get the penis she so much envies and to resolve the phallic conflict within her.
See Penis Envy on Google
so youre saying you have penis envy. :rainbow:
 
Yeah when guys aren't around most chicks just talk about how much they envy men for having a different "swimsuit area". But then we get back to talking about recipes while we quilt.
 
No, its just they dont resolve the Phallic stage of developmental psychology. They need a penis of a baby to help them decide what is right and wrong fulfilling their need to have a penis themselves. So they create one by giving birth to a male child. Once they have the much sought after penis, they are fulfilled. And can finally decide what is right and wrong and teach it to their son
 
Raina said:
Yeah when guys aren't around most chicks just talk about how much they envy men for having a different "swimsuit area". But then we get back to talking about recipes while we quilt.
Shouldn't you be in a kitchen or making babies / puppies or something?
 
So we've established that Debevoise is far more prestigious than Shearman. That's pretty much all the questions I had here.



:cow:
 
I spent the day cleaning and playing with the dog.

He doesn't understand the stages of psychosexual development at all. He's not even a year old though.
 
Raina said:
I spent the day cleaning and playing with the dog.

He doesn't understand the stages of psychosexual development at all. He's not even a year old though.

Wait till he's two, less damaging on the psyche.
 
undefined Hmmm. I wonder. LOL
 
samoth said:
So we've established that Debevoise is far more prestigious than Shearman. That's pretty much all the questions I had here.



:cow:

What do a couple of lawyers have to do with this?
 
biteme said:
undefined Hmmm. I wonder. LOL


Made a joke with a pic, and it wouldn't link from here. Self-pwnage.

BTW, that's a nice orange you got going there. I'm trying out the blue myself.



:cow:
 
eeeks, I step away for ten minutes to prepare dinner for myself, its under tin foil right now and I come back and look what happens!!
No interesting discussion:( I thought for sure the penis envy bit would generate something while I sliced turkey and scooped stuffing
 
redguru said:
What do a couple of lawyers have to do with this?

Well, I was attempting to maintain the random continuity thing going.

Naw, screw it, I'll keep doin' it.



Date: November 5th, 2005 3:58 AM
Author: NewYorkinthe70s

To anyone interested in Shearman, I posted this on GA originally in an attempt to raise the bar on the discussion around that Firm, which I believe suffers from a clot of postings evincing forceful, unsubstantiated opinions:

"I found myself choosing similarly btwn the two top firms you mentioned and went to Shearman. I did a good deal of diligence though, given how Shearman looks on this board. There are some shit-the-bed scary posts, but I'm satisfied that the firm knows it has a perception problem (borne of the layoffs from '01) and a smoldering morale problem that--whether it was born in '01 or not--still compels people to trash the firm anonymously . Together, I had to ask whether these equalled a recruiting problem since so many 1L's are hostage to the bitterness on these boards and Vault, perhaps validly.

Q: Have the people going to Shearman over the last few years been less than top candidates as a reult of the above factors? Answer: if it was ever so, that phase seems to be over. I'm confidently betting on it at least.

I found out that currently, the most associate turnover and unhappiness has been in litigation and that's because people felt overworked. This is a department that has undergone some fitful, aggressive expansion and it's not clear that mgmt has been able to keep up with all the training and development intitiatives amidst the busy-ness. People were stressed and upset that in the midst of the madness, things like the associate life committees and the other great retention perks Shearman distinguished itself with about five years ago have fallen to the side. Instead of hiring more attorneys to cover more work, they've made do with contract atty's because they don't want to compromise on quality of incoming laterals.This all sounds certainly problematic, but perhaps not as fatal and systemic as one could be led to believe.

On the other hand, many of the associates I've spoken to--friends who have been there for years, not recruiting toadies--say that a) litigation heads and the new managing partner(s) are dealing with it and b)other groups are much more stable and relatively problem-free. The misery might just be a litigation department thing. I have spoken to happy people in M&A and Real Estate and neither of them were too obviously chugging Zoloft as they spoke to me.

As far as I'm concerned, every large firm encounters problem patches like Shearman's, and it's how they deal with it that matters. The firm seems to be taking these issues on squarely, not playing ostrich, and that's about the most you can ask.

Note also that the current round of partner de-equitizations has been explained to me (by partners at other firms) as Shearman just cutting some deadwood that should have been dealt with a few years ago. This is not unusual and makes Shearman actually seem healthier in the point of view I heard. Whatever morale problem these de-equitizations engender (will I be next? they all ask) has been mitigated by these cuts having been a long time in coming. Again, it's not ideal to hear a firm is de-equitizing partners but it shoe dropping from the '01 associate cuts.

Overall, I thought the swathe of people I met with--partners, mid-levels, and junior associates alike--were whipsmart and more interesting than the swathes I came across at other places. That, the fact that I want to do M&A, and the evidence I saw that the firm is earnestly addressing its issues makes me as confident as one can be about a decision that is, let's fucking face it, a blind leap."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=260727&forum_id=2#4218002)



HTFuckingH!!!!1!



:cow:
 
BrothaBill said:
eeeks, I step away for ten minutes to prepare dinner for myself, its under tin foil right now and I come back and look what happens!!
No interesting discussion:( I thought for sure the penis envy bit would generate something while I sliced turkey and scooped stuffing

Yeah, this thread died. I think people tend to run when they see you, Redguru and myself posting in one thread.

As they well should.



:cow:
 
samoth said:
Well, I was attempting to maintain the random continuity thing going.

Naw, screw it, I'll keep doin' it.



Date: November 5th, 2005 3:58 AM
Author: NewYorkinthe70s

To anyone interested in Shearman, I posted this on GA originally in an attempt to raise the bar on the discussion around that Firm, which I believe suffers from a clot of postings evincing forceful, unsubstantiated opinions:

"I found myself choosing similarly btwn the two top firms you mentioned and went to Shearman. I did a good deal of diligence though, given how Shearman looks on this board. There are some shit-the-bed scary posts, but I'm satisfied that the firm knows it has a perception problem (borne of the layoffs from '01) and a smoldering morale problem that--whether it was born in '01 or not--still compels people to trash the firm anonymously . Together, I had to ask whether these equalled a recruiting problem since so many 1L's are hostage to the bitterness on these boards and Vault, perhaps validly.

...

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=260727&forum_id=2#4218002)



HTFuckingH!!!!1!



:cow:

Raina's dog had trouble reading that, can you summarize and use pictures?
 
redguru said:
Raina's dog had trouble reading that, can you summarize and use pictures?

No problem, as soon as I get back from the office supply store and grocery store.

Y'all's keep this thread active whilst I'm gone, 'aight?




(Can two contractions be*

eh, never mind, lol)

:cow:
 
samoth said:
Yeah, this thread died. I think people tend to run when they see you, Redguru and myself posting in one thread.

As they well should.



:cow:


lmfao, so true, so true, Ive thought that many times. Its like they just think, why even bother. My retorts are mainly BS anyhow, I think most are wary that Im just fucking with em, but then they set you or redguru up to knock it out of the park with facts
 
MIT owns Harvard Football game

Location: Harvard Stadium
Date: 11/17/90
Group: ZBT
The Harvard-Yale game is a highlight of the football season for students and alums from both universities. Periodically, however, MIT pranksters have taken advantage of the event to generate a little amusement at the expense of both Harvard and Yale.

Half way through the third quarter of the 1990 Harvard-Yale football game, just as Yale prepared to score a field goal, a banner with the letters ``MIT'' shot out of the zero-yard line and over the goal post.

The 8.5' x 3.5' banner was concealed under the sod just inside the end zone. The banner was propelled aloft by a model rocket engine controlled by wire running under the field and into the Harvard stadium. A hacker connected the wires in the stadium to a battery pack concealed in the inner pocket of his jacket to ignite the rocket and trigger the hack -- after all, ``all tech men carry batteries!''

The next day, Boston Herald's headline read:

MIT 1--Harvard-Yale 1
Tech Pranksters Steal the Show
 
I had to leave a board I frequent refularly because of the non-stop viscous attacks on my dog Mr. Benjamin. I finally mustered enough strength to go back there, but i placed a strongly worded remark in my sig about it. I'm so badass.

Of course i could go on, but it hurts deep inside. Very deep.


deep.
 
samoth said:
Yeah, this thread died. I think people tend to run when they see you, Redguru and myself posting in one thread.

As they well should.



:cow:

I thought you two were my alters and i was typing this too myself. I had forgotten my lithium again.
 
Hey Samoth, what about 14C?
 
exotic_island_girl said:
I am a crazy chick , I am a crazy chick

Crazy chicks are great fucks.
 
This thread is full of pussy. I love it!!! Just playin' girls. ;)
 
foreigngirl said:
lol, but you deleted the post that replied to Yasmina's, so I deleted mine

I deleted my post because FG deleted hers. :whatever:


Why all these deletes??
 
YASMINA said:
I deleted my post because FG deleted hers. :whatever:


Why all these deletes??

I dont know why. It just started with you changing your post, EIG answering it and then deleting it and then I deleted mine....chain reaction :lmao:
 
And it was like for a moment, O my brothers, some great bird had flown into the milkbar and I felt all the malenky little hairs on my plott standing endwise and the shivers crawling up like slow malenky lizards and then down again. Because I knew what she sang. It was a bit from the glorious Ninth, by Ludwig van.
 
Top Bottom