White people, have you ever said something racist and be willing to admit it?

[sigweed]

You can only colonise a place severely inferior in development to your own, and while a lot of people feel angry or guilty about the events that followed confrontation, no PC argument succeeds in explaining why Africa, which is said to be the place where people have lived for the longest time, has never been able to even slightly get it´s shit together or why they were living like colonisable animals in the first place. I think their genetic nature is key.

theres a book called Guns, Germs, and Steel.... you should check it out. Not to say you're wrong, but.... yea you're wrong.

 

[75th]

LOL , but he never said he hated white folks

Insult is one thing , hatred is another

On a thread supporting neo-nazism as well...

Youre really giving black/native americans a bad name.

 

[75th]

There is definitly a hate element here that needs to be exposed.

And an overwhelming ignorance coming from you that has been exposed over and over.

 

[75th]

Under my philosophy, a person can't be bad just for his skin color. What makes a person bad or inferior compared to other, is it's cultural level/type, education, traditions, idiosincracy, critical thinking, use of logic, common sense.

Which is why people like these looters and folks like gjohnson I will always consider inferior.

 

[DJ_UFO]

I believe that different races of humans (or genetic variations of the same human race, you PC treehugging nitwit hippies) have adapted through evolution to the circumstances in which they lived and still live.

I believe that this caused the average European to be more intelligent, less physically agressive and more explorative than the average African. Exceptions don´t necessarily disprove this, and some research has been done by amongst others Prof. Dr Jean-Philippe Rushton supports and explores this. I believe the reason the average negro hits puberty 1.5 years earlier is that in their simple incomplex societies, simply getting as many kids as possible is more important for family survival than is being old, smart or mature enough to properly raise them.

I believe it holds great meaning that Europeans were ABLE to colonise and abuse Africa.

When King Leopold II of Belgium came to the Congo as little as 100 or 90 years ago, they lived in tribes whose vision of the world was no greater than a mile or three, were organised as inbenevolent dictatorships and were in constant cannibalistic war with one another. They had never seen a boat bigger than their canoos before and they had never seen a gun. They had no written language. At that time America was booming as we know, Europe had already gone through ages of political, scientific and artistic development.

You can only colonise a place severely inferior in development to your own, and while a lot of people feel angry or guilty about the events that followed confrontation, no PC argument succeeds in explaining why Africa, which is said to be the place where people have lived for the longest time, has never been able to even slightly get it´s shit together or why they were living like colonisable animals in the first place. I think their genetic nature is key.

Every de-colonised nation is now worse off than they were under the suppressive rule of the greedy white man. South Africa now has an openly racist anti-white government that fails to act or even pay attention as the remaining white people of South Africa are terrorized. I guess they´re happy they got the nation in their own hands now, they have the highest rate of rape of any nation, multiple times higher than the next. They´re poorer than before and it sounds rediculous now to recall how SA used to have the best kept road system in the world. They´re not even maintaining it. Of course it´s all still the white man´s fault.

It´s amusing how they´re talking about things like black philosophy, black science, black history, its all an excuse to be proud of something. its like the special olympics. would there be no races, none of these people would be more than an afterthought in the history of their field. (The same applies to all the heroes of the feminist movement)

All in all, the only thing blacks really measure up in are strength, speed and penis size (they say). Kinda like horses, I suppose.

I could go on, I won´t. None of this means id ever act disrespectful to somebody because of their skin color. I don´t. I just try to have a realistic view of the world and history, rather than just set as a primary objective to be politically correct.

If you say this in public, will be obviously considered racist. Shouldn't because of course we know you are sayin the truth. However, in my opinion we should not put other race as inferior. We "see" it as inferior but that's wrong. Your post is absolutely true under the eyes of the white civilization. But sometimes we have to see and observe and not just watch. Africans for sure have or better said had their own pace of evolution. And I say had because after the white civilization colonized the world, every other single race and ethnic group was catched by this new pace, forced to adopt something new, just because if they don't do it they die behind from a lack of natural resources and here is where the problems begin. You cannot accelerate the evolution process of a race, or impose a civilization on a race. They have to develop their own concepts of civilization under their own values and way of thinking. An example, South America. Although South America was conquered by Europeans, just like North America, the mix between Spaniards and Native Indians was very high. Today, in it's majority South America's population is almost like one single race, product of the mix. A minority is White, a minority is Black, the great majority is mix between Spaniard/Indian, Spaniard/Black. Problems, the continent is a complete mess. Why? because they ADOPTED this European "way of thinking", European civilization. The concept of town, city, country, government. Something very far from what their native ancestors were used to. 50% of their brains want to go back to their roots, 50% of their brains have this European influence. So they don't do one or the other good. They perform each one at 50%. That means mediocre. Proof of that, look at those poor speedy Gonzalez running on the desert looking for food (yes is work, but at the end is food)

So at the end, I think Africa stopped it's harmony and balance after they were influenced by the White civilization. Weapons came in, money, or a monetary unit came in, with it materialism, envy, corruption. Leopold went there like 100 years ago and they were tribes, yes, but in peace. We disturbed and altered that peace. And it's our own civilization and technology what is leading to our self-destruction. Overpopulation.

 

[Hiatussin]

theres a book called Guns, Germs, and Steel.... you should check it out. Not to say you're wrong, but.... yea you're wrong.

I didn´t read it, but if it´s a book explaining why bushmen were bushmen simply because they had no steel and microbiology is different there or something, I most likely won`t believe it.

 

[Hiatussin]

So at the end, I think Africa stopped it's harmony and balance after they were influenced by the White civilization. Weapons came in, money, or a monetary unit came in, with it materialism, envy, corruption. Leopold went there like 100 years ago and they were tribes, yes, but in peace. We disturbed and altered that peace. And it's our own civilization and technology what is leading to our self-destruction. Overpopulation.

They were not in peace. They hadn´t the tools for genocides though, but human life was valued lowly.

 

[Spartacus]

I don´t think Hitler had a masterplan of getting rid of Jews all along, at least not as furiously as he later did, Heydrich came up with the concrete plan of deportations. http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/biographies/biogfx/heydrich.jpg

they didn´t know they´d be killed, but they were losing property rights, rights to responsible jobs, even had to wear yellow stars on their coats, before anyone got deported. I don´t see why they stuck around to see what happened next. I´m not saying that makes it ok though. Thats like saying people in NO should have drowned for not leaving when warned.

in a nutshell they were used as slave labor
if it was determined that you couldn't provide enough production(i.e. work) to warrent your existence you got eliminated
simple and logical
as the fortunes of the war turned against Germany the slave camps became death camps
I have a bowl of food
should I feed the soldiers at the front
or the jew et.al. at auschwitz/birkenau?

 

[Spartacus]

"True good and evil lies not in deeds, but in blood. There are no individuals, only lines of heritage, some desirable, some not. "

this quote from your highness merits more commentary
I want to pick your brain nederlander you

 

[Spartacus]

If you say this in public, will be obviously considered racist. Shouldn't because of course we know you are sayin the truth. However, in my opinion we should not put other race as inferior. We "see" it as inferior but that's wrong. Your post is absolutely true under the eyes of the white civilization. But sometimes we have to see and observe and not just watch. Africans for sure have or better said had their own pace of evolution. And I say had because after the white civilization colonized the world, every other single race and ethnic group was catched by this new pace, forced to adopt something new, just because if they don't do it they die behind from a lack of natural resources and here is where the problems begin. You cannot accelerate the evolution process of a race, or impose a civilization on a race. They have to develop their own concepts of civilization under their own values and way of thinking. An example, South America. Although South America was conquered by Europeans, just like North America, the mix between Spaniards and Native Indians was very high. Today, in it's majority South America's population is almost like one single race, product of the mix. A minority is White, a minority is Black, the great majority is mix between Spaniard/Indian, Spaniard/Black. Problems, the continent is a complete mess. Why? because they ADOPTED this European "way of thinking", European civilization. The concept of town, city, country, government. Something very far from what their native ancestors were used to. 50% of their brains want to go back to their roots, 50% of their brains have this European influence. So they don't do one or the other good. They perform each one at 50%. That means mediocre. Proof of that, look at those poor speedy Gonzalez running on the desert looking for food (yes is work, but at the end is food)

sounds ripe for a dictator
why do historical dictators get such a bad rap?

britian and france need to reclaim their african colonies asap