Re: Re: Jag X-type
You dopey people and your car advice...Stick to llamas, people.
First of all, Nissan put lots of work into their engines, just as Honda and shared similar technology for years. Personally, I'd go for the lower mileage car. Remember, you can't roll back time. Nissan also put a microfinish on most of thier internal parts, making for an extremely durable engine, however, 100k is up there.
To pay for a high mileage vehicle just because it's HONDA is simply ludicrous. GROW A BRAIN. Besides, Honda's reputation is based on people who don't know cars. It's a machine just as any other and will break--especially at 100,000 miles. At that mileage, you need to change most belts, including the timing chain/belt, replace the all the hoses since they'll be about ready to bust, and you're going to get stupid problems like alternator, radiator, heater core, starter, head gasket, exhuast leak, and whatever. Those of you who don't know shit about cars, back off. Stop giving advice if you don't know how to change a freakin tire.
I'm not saying go for Honda because of it's rep. but because it's 60,000 miles less. Common sense, dude!!!