nolimitxxx
New member
Nelson Montana said:Sooner or later...whatever line of thought is accepted, becomes outdated, discredited, or replaced with a new way to think.
When it comes to steroids the tides have shifted dramatically.
For example;
Pyramiding is best. Pyramiding is worst.
It's best to taper down. Tapering is useless.
Decca doesn't supress. Decca is most suppressive.
Test is the worst choice as a first cycle. Test is the best for a first cycle.
Winstrol is weak. Winstrol is stong.
Anti e's are best after a cycle. Anti e's should be used during a cycle.
Avarr is safe. Avarr wreaks havoc with your lipids.
Droll is the most powerful muscle builder. Droll is all water weight.
Nolvaldex - tamoxifen citrate - is essential. Nolvaldex - tamoxifen citrate - isn't worth the sides.
Clomid makes me a horndog. Clomid made me lose my dick.
5000 i.u's of HC G is standard. 500 i.u's is standard.
Prohormones are like weak steroids. Pro hormones just bump estrogen.
50 mgs of an oral is the maximum the liver can tolerate. 50mgs is the minimum worth taking in a cycle.
G H is the necter of the gods. G H is overrated.
Clenbuterol is anti catabolic. Clenbuterol is catabolic.
Pharm grade is best. There's no difference between pharm and vet gear. Pharm grade is best.
And on and on it goes.
There is so much more information. But being MISinformed is often worse than being UNinformed. In some cases, the original line of thinking was correct, just to be replaced by a better sounding psuedo scientific line of thinking that was wrong. In many ways we know a lot more. In many ways we don't know shit.
So I present this challange.
What current tenet do you think will fall out of favor within a few years? And what is taken as a "proven method" that you you don't buy into?
.
lol - at least we can agree on something