WODIN said:
This question can be raised at many levels. Initially, to try and understand emptiness I personalised the expression in terms of “Do I feel empty / Is my life empty” – and what exactly does that mean?
To me it was quite apparent that for my life to be empty in a literal sense was a nonsense, as I am constantly provided with and seeking stimulus both consciously and subconsciously. So what this question (interpreted personally) became was - am I satisfied? Am I feeding my desires, be they physical / emotional / spiritual? And if so to what purpose are my desires bound? Does feeding my desires automatically fill the void of emptiness? Should emptiness be perceived as a negative, nihilistic in nature? These questions were however leading me astray of the original question “What is emptiness?”
I next thought of emptiness in terms of cognitive function and came up with:
Having nothing more or nothing less, to be void of any reaction or thought, be that cognitive assimilation, physical / mental process. Additionally absence of creative activity – the ability to not enter into conjecture or speculate – to totally let go.
The cessation of emotional response must also take place, in accordance if feelings ride upon the foundation of consciousness with love & hate primarily adjudged the two extremes, they and all sub categories must be released.
I therefore concluded that total abandonment of consciousness and sub-consciousness is necessary in order to achieve emptiness, in my opinion an impossibility for the human mind. You could argue that in certain states (sleep, coma) we do not perceive the ultimate reality underlying our experience however I do not feel emptiness is achieved, as some level of activity is present and therefore provides a sensation, even if at a deep subconscious level.
My conclusion was that the human mind could not experience emptiness but that does not mean emptiness is universally unobtainable, after all in theory it should be the most simple form, that from which all else began.