This is the most vascular I have ever been.
Current cycle
680mg Equipoise - boldenone undecylenate -
750mg Test testosterone cypionate
150mg Mast testosterone propionate eod
Lovin it!!!!!!
i just ran my first cycle of tren, very light just 37.5 ed. I got descently vascular off it but im like 11-12% right now. Ive run both eq @400mg and var @ 75mg at the same time and i was a fuckin roadmap, 8 pack with veins all over my stomach ripped i mean.
Fun aint the word. I dropped my d-bol 4 weeks ago and added the Masteron Prop. to tell you the truth I feel alot stronger with the mast than the d-bol. I was running the naps at 50mg ed. I've even been more aggressive in the gym.
a lot of interesting replies here. Obv. the most important factors for vascularity are good genetics and low bf. That wasn't what i was asking tho. These factors come under the heading of all else being equal for the purpose of my question. I purposely held such factors constant by assuming that the subject had the same starting off stats. My question was which drug would give the best vascularity for the same person (genetic factor held constant) with the same stats (bf at starting off point held constant). I never wrote about diet but of course that is also assumed to be spot on.
I think a lot of people look to these drugs as easy fixes. Because of this many experienced peeps never misses an opportunity to point out that "this is about diet" or "drugs wont help u here if u aint got the genes thats too bad". That kind of response is needful as a reminder that there isn't any easy fixes and there is severe health repercussions if these things are overdone. However these drugs does have different effects. Vascularity is one possible parameter to tell these effects apart. To pretend otherwise is hogwash.
PG-CL seems to be the business for increasing vascularity, from my experience, also, what about increasing blood volume, aka anapolon style, that would surely make those veins appear fuller!
a lot of interesting replies here. Obv. the most important factors for vascularity are good genetics and low bf. That wasn't what i was asking tho. These factors come under the heading of all else being equal for the purpose of my question. I purposely held such factors constant by assuming that the subject had the same starting off stats. My question was which drug would give the best vascularity for the same person (genetic factor held constant) with the same stats (bf at starting off point held constant). I never wrote about diet but of course that is also assumed to be spot on.
I think a lot of people look to these drugs as easy fixes. Because of this many experienced peeps never misses an opportunity to point out that "this is about diet" or "drugs wont help u here if u aint got the genes thats too bad". That kind of response is needful as a reminder that there isn't any easy fixes and there is severe health repercussions if these things are overdone. However these drugs does have different effects. Vascularity is one possible parameter to tell these effects apart. To pretend otherwise is hogwash.
Aside from all this, socket is right, it's the increase in blood volume that brings out the veins. Any steroid will do that and one which causes water retention will do it especially well. So, low BF% + increased blood = vascularity -- or as much as your genetics will allow. VIGOR may be the only supplment that will increase vascularity because it increases blood volume. Staying hydrated and having glucose in your system are also factors.
Aside from all this, socket is right, it's the increase in blood volume that brings out the veins. Any steroid will do that and one which causes water retention will do it especially well. So, low BF% + increased blood = vascularity -- or as much as your genetics will allow. VIGOR may be the only supplment that will increase vascularity because it increases blood volume. Staying hydrated and having glucose in your system are also factors.
After my current cycle i'm taking a long break to recuperate properly. I might actually try out ur line Nelson. My experience with sups have been very disappointing so far but that could be because i haven't tried the right ones i guess.
After my current cycle i'm taking a long break to recuperate properly. I might actually try out ur line Nelson. My experience with sups have been very disappointing so far but that could be because i haven't tried the right ones i guess.
I know I can be passionate about the benefits of supplementation but anyone who's read my books know I dismiss and discredit about 95% of the supps being sold. It's ALL about using the right ones.