US alone with Israel after latest attacks.

[primetime21]

Well, then up the ratio to 100/1...whatever it takes to make the terrorists lay off.

It has not been 10-1. Recently 19 israelis were killed by a suicide bomber. There were not 190 deaths in israels retaliation. Maybe a couple of deaths. Their response is always more "destrcutive" but usually more damaging to buildings and not in terms of deaths. They usually send warnings before they launch an attack on a base or a building that they believe is terrorist related. Or they launch the attack against hamas leaders and not merely sending missiles into night clubs (which they COULD, but OPT not to).

 

[canadianhitman]

Notice that Israel never just launches a surprise attack to break a cease-fire or cooling off or whatever they're called when the US gets both sides to agree to one. It is always the Palestinians who start shit up again, then Israel retaliates. That is why they are considered to be defending themselves, while Hamas and others are terrorists.

 

[gonelifting]

Well, then up the ratio to 100/1...whatever it takes to make the terrorists lay off.

I can definately understand the aggravation, but look at what happened with the last bomber. Her husbancd or brother and uncle.. whatever were killed in a Isreali attack earlier this year. They showed her on the news weeping etc. in the rubble of the remains. She, In turn "retaliated" the only way she knew how.

Now if Isreal kills MORE than 10-1, Say 100 to one. Don`t you think all these people have families that are on the edge of thier rope too? Just like this lady.

One has to remember, They don`t watch the same news/opinion channels we do. Why do you think the whole world does`nt think like us? We all watch different stuff.

Any one of us say "If a dude broke into my house..." I would KILL HIM and... blah blah blah..." That`s what they`re doing.

You would defend your families would`nt you? Youn have to always look at both sides.

 

[canadianhitman]

I think that the first side to break a cease-fire should be pummeled....end of story. This whole land thing is a legal dispute, and should be settled by binding arbitration adjudicated by a non-biased party.

 

[gonelifting]

I think that the first side to break a cease-fire should be pummeled....end of story. This whole land thing is a legal dispute, and should be settled by binding arbitration adjudicated by a non-biased party.

And what if it`s Isreal? Who`s gonna "pummel" them? The US? lol

US Owned by Isreal.

 

[anabolicmd]

Notice that Israel never just launches a surprise attack to break a cease-fire or cooling off or whatever they're called when the US gets both sides to agree to one. It is always the Palestinians who start shit up again, then Israel retaliates. That is why they are considered to be defending themselves, while Hamas and others are terrorists.

That would make perfect sense except for the little known fact that Israel is OCCUPYING Palestine. There are no limits to how a nation fights against occupyers. The Palestinians have every right to drive out the Israeli occupation by any means necessary.

 

[primetime21]

That would make perfect sense except for the little known fact that Israel is OCCUPYING Palestine. There are no limits to how a nation fights against occupyers. The Palestinians have every right to drive out the Israeli occupation by any means necessary.

Israel occupies palestine, like america is occupying Native American Land. I don't think any country can claim to have been the only "owner" throughout history. And jews were occupying israel many centuries before the word palestinian was ever created. That argument does not hold water.

 

[anabolicmd]

Israel occupies palestine, like america is occupying Native American Land. I don't think any country can claim to have been the only "owner" throughout history. And jews were occupying israel many centuries before the word palestinian was ever created. That argument does not hold water.

A) You cannot compare internationally recognized borders of Israel and Palestine to the American conquest of Native American land. The US is not occupying land that is outside its borders, Israel is.

B) When was the word "Palestinian" created really, Id like to know. Regardless of that both sides claim to be the ancient residents of those lands. Barring a time machine, we ought to stick to the borders that are there now, and that Israel is violating.

C) To summarize, Israel is in fact acting as an occupying force in Palestine. The Palestinians have ever right to expel the invading army by any means necessary.

 

[gonelifting]

Notice that Israel never just launches a surprise attack to break a cease-fire or cooling off or whatever they're called when the US gets both sides to agree to one. It is always the Palestinians who start shit up again, then Israel retaliates. That is why they are considered to be defending themselves, while Hamas and others are terrorists.

This is not a true statement. After "cease fires" Isreal has "targeted killing" of "militants we were after for years" and "could`nt pass up the oppurtunity."

Days or a week later , Suicide bomber strikes with "revenge for the killing of blah blah" Then ALL YOU HEAR ON THE NEWS is "Will Isreal retaliate?" lol

Like I said you have to look at both sides.

 

[milo hobgoblin]

you know what they need...

They need Jesse Jackson and Rodney King over there to straighten things out...

That would warm them up for the BIG GUNS.. JIMMY FUCKING CARTER!

I hope They all nuke the fuck out of each other.

We could just declare that whole area a radioation zone... uninhabitable for a million years.

Eventually the Morlocks will move there.