Silent Method said:Thanks for your reply. Nothing but good solid info here. Yes, I meant to say natural limit, not genetic limit. (I felt something wrong with that, hence the " " around genetic!)
Realgains said:#1. to make a cycle less androgenic yet plenty anabolic. A test/EQ stack would be a good example of this. As mentioned above, 250 of EQ and 250 of test will produce almost the same gains as 500 of test but will be less androgenic and cause fewer sides.
Can you point to some data for this or is this based on observation?
I don't have the scientific data but I will make a few comments.
#1 Boldenone is highly anabolic but less androgenic than test or tren. It is slightly more androgenic than nandrolone . #2.It does aromatize to estrogen but doesn't have a high affinity to do so. It aromatizes at about half the rate of test.
So you can see how it would be useful with a strong androgen in order to keep the androgen level moderate and bloat down yet keep the ananbolic component high.
Nandrolone is also highly anabolic and aromatizes at about a quarter the rate of test. It has a very high affinity for the AR. It is somewhat progestogenic however and progesterone can also cause bloat and gyno....still nandrolone causes much less bloat, or gyno for that matter, than does an equal amount of test. It is also the only steroid that is somewhat safe for the hairline as it converts to the very weak DHN and not the very strong androgen DHT form test.
You could also run straight Boldonone and get pretty decent results but a mix of test and boldenone proves to be better.
Nandrolone has been run by itself too. It is moderately affective at a 2mg per pound of body weight dose. It can give nice slow but steady gains without a lot of bloat. Proviron or a little test is needed in order to keep ones sex drive alive as nandrolone is very low in androgen.
Sorry for the rambling.
RG
Last edited: