Ugh... got a copy of a subpeona in the mail today regarding my divorce...

[all the whey]

JH1, have you had a DNA test done yet?

Over 1/3 of all dna test done for divorce child support are found to be negative.

Estimated as high as 18% of all children are being raised or supported by a man who is not the father. (But, thinks he is)

 

[jh1]

JH1, have you had a DNA test done yet?

Over 1/3 of all dna test done for divorce child support are found to be negative.

Estimated as high as 18% of all children are being raised or supported by a man who is not the father. (But, thinks he is)

She looks just like me. I never had a doubt.

Then somone posted some shit on here about a guy that was being forced to pay even after accidently finding out they weren't his kids due to some medical shit and I ordered a home DNA test.

She's mine.

I am sure people will make nasty comments about that. Shut it, before you say it - assplants.

 

[jh1]

 

[heatherrae]

Oh yeah.. no it doesn't say gender. I am saying if you make more money you pay.. but it is not an equitable distribution. See my pasted example.

Your statement in bold is where it all falls apart. 50%-50% custody does not equal 50/50 support - even after the prorated income support amounts. I completely agree that support should be based on the income percentages - which it is. But they fail to make the support percetage distribution amounts tied directed to the custody % amounts.

Completely broken system.

no, we have agreed all along. You just aren't thinking we are...lol. You are always ready to fight with me when this topic comes up even when I am agreeing with you...lol.

 

[all the whey]

She looks just like me. I never had a doubt.

Then somone posted some shit on here about a guy that was being forced to pay even after accidently finding out they weren't his kids due to some medical shit and I ordered a home DNA test.

She's mine.

I am sure people will make nasty comments about that. Shut it, before you say it - assplants.

Props to you for checking. It is important for medical reasons also.

And, yes each state is different. But, some states you only have 1yr after birth to prove that you are not the baby. But, after that the state will still hold you responcible for support. (even if you are proved to not be the father)

Another unfair issue with divorce/kids.

 

[heatherrae]

Props to you for checking. It is important for medical reasons also.

And, yes each state is different. But, some states you only have 1yr after birth to prove that you are not the baby. But, after that the state will still hold you responcible for support. (even if you are proved to not be the father)

Another unfair issue with divorce/kids.

If you are married at the time of birth you are presumed to be the father unless it is proven otherwise.

If you are not married, then paternity has to be established in a paternity case or paternity can be established if the man signs an acknowledgment of paternity.

 

[all the whey]

If you are married at the time of birth you are presumed to be the father unless it is proven otherwise.

If you are not married, then paternity has to be established in a paternity case or paternity can be established if the man signs an acknowledgment of paternity.

Yes, but most states you have 1 to 5 yrs to prove that you are not the father. After that it doesn't matter. You have to pay.

This another reason I only...

 

[Smurfy]

that friggin' sucks if you're not.
did you give that up to get full custody? i'm sorry, but you deserve SOMETHING to help out. did he relinquish all responsibility to lumberg? can you take him to court?

(this is personal stuff, i know. don't answer if you don't want to publicly)

nah he didnt relinquish anything. I do have sole custody and he is ordered to pay $200 a week but he's a Union Laborer and when he doesnt work, there's no money going to the State Child Support Unit, therefore no money to me. Lucky for my son, I dont need the money to continue living a life to which I am accustomed to. In other w0rds, my son is provided for regardless.

 

[heatherrae]

Yes, but most states you have 1 to 5 yrs to prove that you are not the father. After that it doesn't matter. You have to pay.

This another reason I only...

none of your kitteh pics are working for me tonight. It says I'm not authorized to view the page. did you set it to private?

 

[jh1]

nah he didnt relinquish anything. I do have sole custody and he is ordered to pay $200 a week but he's a Union Laborer and when he doesnt work, there's no money going to the State Child Support Unit, therefore no money to me. Lucky for my son, I dont need the money to continue living a life to which I am accustomed to. In other w0rds, my son is provided for regardless.

100% custody deserves 100% of the CS for your combined income levels.


When one of those people is a complete lame ass, the combined income should be based on their income potential - so that means lame ass should have to pay up to 100% of his actual incoime to fulfill his portion of the responsibility.

I'm sorry your ex is a fhuggin looser.