Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
Truth about Test ????? HELP?????
- Thread starter 2thin
- Start date
harmonic
New member
Gee E2, I figure considering the fact I respect you soooo much, you'd at least respect me back. That was a direct hit "I'm laughing at you not with you".. Damn, I'm not stating my own facts, I'm just relaying info from a well know book of knowlege that we all use or have used. Shit. E2, I looked up to until now. Thanks alot. That was just simply mean.....E2 said:
What exatcly<<< yes I said exactly.. Did I say<< yes I said I. That was incorrect? Please tell me..
Have to agree with Nahanrac and Ripped103. Sustanon is simply a mixture of time-released testosterone. The different terms, testosterone isocaproat.. etc.. refer to the esters. By being released at specific times, through the absorption of the ester gruop by the body, a synergistic release of testosterone is maintained. No matter what the ester attached is, the testosterone always affects androgen receptors and those only. The idea of there being more than one type of androgen receptor is incorrect. My 0.02.
Myo-genetic
New member
Harmonic,
You are 100%, without a doubt, wrong.
There is only one type of androgen receptor.
I really hope your profession is not pharmacology or biochemistry, well it wouldn't be for long with those thought processes.
At first I thought this was a funny thread, but after reflecting at the overall shitty mis-information that is spewed forth on a daily basis on this board, I have to say that it is just sad.
I get my knowledge from real chemistry reference guides and journals....I suggest you do the same. Anabolics 2000 is riddled with errors.
This not to completely ridicule you because I know you are trying to help. But if you don't know, don't post. And your question to E2 proves that you haven't a clue.
You are 100%, without a doubt, wrong.
There is only one type of androgen receptor.
I really hope your profession is not pharmacology or biochemistry, well it wouldn't be for long with those thought processes.
At first I thought this was a funny thread, but after reflecting at the overall shitty mis-information that is spewed forth on a daily basis on this board, I have to say that it is just sad.
I get my knowledge from real chemistry reference guides and journals....I suggest you do the same. Anabolics 2000 is riddled with errors.
This not to completely ridicule you because I know you are trying to help. But if you don't know, don't post. And your question to E2 proves that you haven't a clue.
imprint516
New member
TEST is TEST everyone will react a lil diff to each ..some better to others.. I myself do have a question though...and thats to question the quality of the brovel Enanthate...i heard thats some dirty shit...never used it though wanted to on next cycle..always went with nile sus or the best Cycatoah(which i think is some of the cleanest anabolics around) but id like to hear bros opinions.,
Similar threads
