Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

theory why primo causes hair loss

Your theory is wrong dude.

If estrogen was needed for hair maintenance then children would go bald because basically they don't have any estrogen.
 
AlwaysOn said:
go ahead dude, and PM me if you want to.

nothin personal,

its just that primo is NOT a DHT-derivative,


Everything I read online and what I learn from the vets on here and a few other boards tells me you are wrong. If you have some profile or info to prove you are correct, then post it. Just because you say it isn't doesn't make you right and a good portion for the basis of a theroy are some facts to form said theory. Indy is a pretty intelligent fellow overall and he has a good amount of experience and knowledge with Primo, so you really need to "lay out your spread" or shut up. Like you said it's nothing personal, but if you are going to disagree with someone that's fine, we don't all have to agree. But debate don't just start saying he's wrong or start insinuating he is stupid and not back it up. I had to put one newbie in his place for pulling the same crap last week, and I won't hesitate to do it again. Debate and learn, don't just insult.

*deep breath*

NOW.........please post up your rebuttal. (what I mean by rebuttal is posting up your information and/or facts (not insults) that would dispute the information that Indy has put up)
 
Herbiv0re said:
Why are you guys dissing someone who is right?
Methenolone is not a DHT derivative, period.


Well according the the profiles I am reading online and other sites, you are not correct. The profile Indy put up on page one is a good example, and the counter point to your statement is in bold towards the begining. Where are you getting your information and please post it so we can see both sides of the argument.
 
AlwaysOn said:
Ok so now you admit, primo is derivative of the "prohormone" 1-testosterone also known as DHB (also known as the reduced form of the base steroid of equipoise).

So now we can proceed with what I posted in my original post.


Lets address the first issue at hand....

DHB is a compound that basically makes up DHT. Making primo a DHT derivative. Its just that simple.

You cant compair Primo to a 1-test product. Is the chemical make up similar..yes..but different. If it was the same then why do you bloat and get so much water retention on 1-test. Do you get that with Primo....NO!

Second problem.....
Dont start calling people out to start an argument over PM's Good way to get your self banned...And honestly calling Indy out...Thats just barking up the wrong tree. Im not starting anything with you or trying to be agressive..but i consider Indy a friend..and he is friends with alot of people here..ok everyone one of importance here. Just drop it...

Primo is a DHT derivative.
 
LftHndPwrHouse said:
Second problem.....
Dont start calling people out to start an argument over PM's Good way to get your self banned...And honestly calling Indy out...Thats just barking up the wrong tree. Im not starting anything with you or trying to be agressive..but i consider Indy a friend..and he is friends with alot of people here..ok everyone one of importance here. Just drop it...

Primo is a DHT derivative.


lol, I DID drop it all the way on page one!!


OTHER people are taking up my cause!

Again, what did I do wrong that I am getting negaitve karma and bombs..lol

I was just trying to educate you all, after all I am a fucking BIOCHEMIST.

I teach this stuff to my students all the time...lol
 
Last edited:
Hey, Indy and board!

I apologize if my language was coarse.

AGAIN for the third time, it was nothin personal against anyone. (I keep trying to drop it, but you guys keep bringing it up. )

Just a bad choice of words.

I respectively disagree, that primo is a DHT-derivative.

Hell, your "sacred profiles" agree with me that it is a DHB derivative which is totally different than DHT in structure if any of you actually bothered to compare the two. :rolleyes:
 
AlwaysOn said:
lol, I DID drop it all the way on page one!!


OTHER people are taking up my cause!

Again, what did I do wrong that I am getting negaitve karma and bombs..lol

I was just trying to educate you all, after all I am a fucking BIOCHEMIST.

I teach this stuff to my students all the time...lol


Well, I appreciate you taking a change in your approach. I do have a question for you......and it's hard to say without sounding as though i am calling you a liar so for the record I am not. However, I find it hard to beleive that you, a "biochemist" , doesn't have a buttload of scientific data or factual information to condradict these "sacred profiles" as you called them. I have 2 friends that work in the science and research field and they would of bored me to death with fact after fact to support their theory. If you are in fact a biochemist then I think I can speak for a lot of the members when I will ask you again to please post some information with more substance instead of just disagreeing. I am here to learn and primo does interest me. The more I can learn about it the better. I look forward to your reply.
 
AlwaysOn said:
Hey, Indy and board!

I apologize if my language was coarse.

AGAIN for the third time, it was nothin personal against anyone. (I keep trying to drop it, but you guys keep bringing it up. )

Just a bad choice of words.

I respectively disagree, that primo is a DHT-derivative.

Hell, your "sacred profiles" agree with me that it is a DHB derivative which is totally different than DHT in structure if any of you actually bothered to compare the two. :rolleyes:

Apology accepted, I am happy you stepped up and did so. I cannot see your posts due to my ignore list, but other bro's let me know, and I removed you from it, much appreciated. Now please read post #25 it uses more exact phrasing than I did, and the person that posted is overly qualified to answer that question, yet it is not by business to disclose what his profession is. What he posted is what I was getting at, but I'm no doc so cannot word it as well as I would have wanted to.

To answer your other questions, you were being quite brisk to say the least and I think wayneboard1 summed up the other issues enough that I dont have to repeat. Once again read the post by lfthndpwrhouse and respond to that accordingly, I dont see how you could disagree with his clarification.
 
Okay guys, bashing over. Give the guy a break. Debate is encouraged on this board. He admitted he should have chosen the wording of his initial argument better. Apology has been accepted by Indy, so PLEASE don't drop a 4th bomb, and give the guy a chance to make his points.
 
Top Bottom